Inter-organizational Relationship

Source-qualified relationship identity record

Qualified relationship assertion for source-qualified relationship identity. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which master namespace and identifier distinguish this relationship from another relationship between the same organizations? identity
2. Which versioned kind definition makes it partnership, affiliation, supply, control or another relation, and which near-neighbour kinds are excluded? classification
3. Which scope qualifier distinguishes parallel relationships by service, geography, business unit or agreement without overwriting one another? constraint

Participants, direction and multiplicity record

Qualified relationship assertion for participants, direction and multiplicity. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which organization references occupy each endpoint role and which identity resolution remains unknown or disputed? relationship
2. Is the relation directional, reciprocal or symmetric under its kind, and what inverse label preserves rather than changes its meaning? relationship
3. Is this a bilateral relation or a multi-party arrangement, and what is lost if its membership is exported as pairwise edges? composition

Basis, recognition and authority record

Qualified relationship assertion for basis, recognition and authority. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. What evidence establishes the claimed relation rather than merely common branding, a shared address or an unverified marketing statement? evidence
2. Who asserts or recognizes it, in which capacity, and does the other party confirm, contest or have no recorded position? authority
3. Which governing instrument and jurisdiction qualify the assertion without transferring contract ownership or legal adjudication to this record? requirement

Control and ownership interpretation record

Qualified relationship assertion for control and ownership interpretation. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Does the relation concern accounting consolidation, equity, votes, other control or beneficial interest, and which definition applies? classification
2. What share, range, denominator, class, date and uncertainty qualify a quantitative interest instead of an unqualified percentage? measurement
3. Is direct or indirect control explicitly evidenced, which intermediate records support it, and which inference rules are prohibited? relationship

Partnership purpose and responsibilities record

Qualified relationship assertion for partnership purpose and responsibilities. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. What jointly stated purpose and activity scope belong to this collaboration? definition
2. Which responsibilities are attributed to each party and where are their governing mandates mastered? authority
3. What limits distinguish the collaboration from a newly formed legal entity or permission for an agent to bind either party? constraint

Supply and service linkage record

Qualified relationship assertion for supply and service linkage. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which party supplies and which receives what defined service or product scope, without importing orders, delivery events or payments here? relationship
2. Is the linkage prospective, awarded, observed or terminated, and what process-qualified evidence establishes that state? state
3. Which customer/account or supplier-qualification models master the detailed commercial lifecycle and which fields must not be duplicated here? ownership

Effective interval and record history record

Qualified relationship assertion for effective interval and record history. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. When did the relationship take effect and cease, at what precision, and are interval endpoints known, estimated or open? temporal
2. When was the assertion observed, recorded and published, distinct from its effective interval, and which revision supersedes it? provenance
3. Does closure mean real-world termination, publisher record retirement or correction of erroneous data, and how is that distinction retained? lifecycle

Graph derivation and structural constraints record

Qualified relationship assertion for graph derivation and structural constraints. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which kind-specific constraints permit or forbid self-links, cycles and multiple parents without imposing one universal organization tree? constraint
2. Which direct records, time slice and rule generated an indirect relation, and can the derived edge be reproduced separately from asserted data? provenance
3. What ambiguity or information loss arises from merging conflicting, incomplete or differently scoped relationship graphs? quality

Evidence quality and counterclaims record

Qualified relationship assertion for evidence quality and counterclaims. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which attributable source, exact record and retrieval context support each relationship assertion, and what validation has actually occurred? evidence
2. Which contradictory assertions coexist and who may resolve their conflict under the Dimension policy rather than overwrite inconvenient evidence? decision
3. Does missing data mean unknown, withheld, not reported, expired or explicit non-existence within a defined search scope? exception

Mastership, freshness and permitted disclosure record

Qualified relationship assertion for mastership, freshness and permitted disclosure. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which system and role master this relationship record and when is review due? ownership
2. Which fields or endpoints are confidential, redacted or publicly reusable under a stated access policy and source license? access
3. How does a redacted projection preserve the distinction between withheld and absent information while retaining an authorized evidence trail? privacy

Versioned external mappings record

Qualified relationship assertion for versioned external mappings. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which exact relationship kinds map to ORG, GLEIF RR-CDF, BODS or OCDS, and which merely have broader or narrower correspondence? interoperability
2. What qualifiers, time precision, multi-party structure or assertion status would be lost in each export? interoperability
3. Which pinned schema/profile and round-trip fixtures demonstrate accepted mappings rather than an unsupported conformance claim? validation

Safe relationship maintenance operations record

Qualified relationship assertion for safe relationship maintenance operations. Retain source scope and do not infer legal or commercial authority from its mere existence.

1. Which policy permits an agent to record, revise, dispute or retire the local assertion without creating or ending the real-world relationship? authority
2. Which expected revision and graph checks must pass before an append, and what conflict response preserves concurrent evidence? validation
3. What post-write checks and compensating revision restore correctness without deleting provenance or silently widening disclosure? process