World Models · Published

Education / Qualification

Represent a person's source-qualified learning path, assessed outcomes, qualification awards, credentials and recognition decisions independent of storage and interface format.

AI YAMLAGENTS.mdResearch evidence
Published. Research assurance: reviewable-draft. The Codex-only synthesis is published under an explicit repository-owner provider waiver. It passed structural validation and a separate no-tools adversarial audit, but remains a reviewable draft until independent second-provider review and the holds below are closed.
Catalogue IDWM-PER-008
Version0.3.0-research.1
Previous version-
Typeentity
ValidationPassed
Synthesis digestsha256:7c1799436ac52525…
10Sources
7Bundles
16Layers
32Findings
96Questions
32Artifacts
Format-independent logical structure

Bundles → Layers → Findings → Questions + Artifacts

framework-programme-and-offeringFramework, programme and offering2 layers

Identifies the education system, programme and qualification framework in which learning occurs.

education-system-and-frameworkEducation system and framework2 findings

Jurisdictional systems, classifications and qualification levels.

education-system-jurisdiction-and-authority

Education system, jurisdiction and authority

Governing education system, competent authority, jurisdiction, sector, validity and source.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for education system, jurisdiction and authority?authority
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes education system, jurisdiction and authority, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may education system, jurisdiction and authority be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Education system, jurisdiction and authority recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for education system, jurisdiction and authority with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
isced-field-level-national-framework-and-eqf-mapping

ISCED field and level, national framework and EQF mapping

Pinned classification and framework references, source and target versions, mapping authority, scope and non-equivalence caveats.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for isced field and level, national framework and eqf mapping?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes isced field and level, national framework and eqf mapping, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may isced field and level, national framework and eqf mapping be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • ISCED field and level, national framework and EQF mapping recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for isced field and level, national framework and eqf mapping with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
programme-and-offering-definitionProgramme and offering definition2 findings

The governed learning opportunity and rules available to a cohort or learner.

programme-identity-title-provider-awarding-body-and-edition

Programme identity, title, provider, awarding body and edition

Authoritative programme identifier, language titles, provider, competent awarding body, delivery profile, edition and effective interval.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for programme identity, title, provider, awarding body and edition?identity
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes programme identity, title, provider, awarding body and edition, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may programme identity, title, provider, awarding body and edition be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Programme identity, title, provider, awarding body and edition recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for programme identity, title, provider, awarding body and edition with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
entry-curriculum-credit-progression-completion-and-exit-rules

Entry, curriculum, credit, progression, completion and exit rules

Versioned prerequisites, required and elective components, workload or credit system, progression, completion, expiry and available exits.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for entry, curriculum, credit, progression, completion and exit rules?requirement
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes entry, curriculum, credit, progression, completion and exit rules, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may entry, curriculum, credit, progression, completion and exit rules be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Entry, curriculum, credit, progression, completion and exit rules recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for entry, curriculum, credit, progression, completion and exit rules with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
learner-participation-and-pathLearner participation and path2 layers

Represents the learner's governed relationship to programmes and components.

admission-and-enrolmentAdmission and enrolment2 findings

Learner-programme identity, decisions, status and conditions.

application-admission-decision-conditions-and-appeal

Application, admission decision, conditions and appeal

External application, deciding authority, criteria version, decision, conditions, reason, effective time and review or appeal state.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for application, admission decision, conditions and appeal?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes application, admission decision, conditions and appeal, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may application, admission decision, conditions and appeal be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Application, admission decision, conditions and appeal recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for application, admission decision, conditions and appeal with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
learner-programme-binding-enrolment-status-load-and-period

Learner-programme binding, enrolment status, load and period

Privacy-preserving learner and programme references, enrolment identifier, status, study mode, load, cohort and valid interval.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for learner-programme binding, enrolment status, load and period?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes learner-programme binding, enrolment status, load and period, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may learner-programme binding, enrolment status, load and period be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Learner-programme binding, enrolment status, load and period recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for learner-programme binding, enrolment status, load and period with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
learning-path-and-prior-learningLearning path and prior learning2 findings

Planned and completed components plus recognized transfer or prior learning.

planned-component-participation-attendance-and-completion

Planned component, participation, attendance and completion

Course or module references, requirement role, sequence, participation evidence and source-qualified completion state.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for planned component, participation, attendance and completion?process
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes planned component, participation, attendance and completion, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may planned component, participation, attendance and completion be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Planned component, participation, attendance and completion recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for planned component, participation, attendance and completion with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
transfer-credit-prior-learning-exemption-and-substitution

Transfer credit, prior learning, exemption and substitution

Source achievement, recognition method, deciding authority, mapped requirement, credit, limitations, expiry and reversal history.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for transfer credit, prior learning, exemption and substitution?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes transfer credit, prior learning, exemption and substitution, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may transfer credit, prior learning, exemption and substitution be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Transfer credit, prior learning, exemption and substitution recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for transfer credit, prior learning, exemption and substitution with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
learning-outcomes-assessment-and-validationLearning outcomes, assessment and validation2 layers

Connects intended and demonstrated learning to source evidence and competent decisions.

outcomes-competencies-and-achievementOutcomes, competencies and achievement2 findings

Expected outcomes, external alignments and learner achievement levels.

learning-outcome-knowledge-skill-responsibility-and-context

Learning outcome, knowledge, skill, responsibility and context

Versioned outcome definition, type, expected complexity, performance context, evidence requirement and framework source.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for learning outcome, knowledge, skill, responsibility and context?definition
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes learning outcome, knowledge, skill, responsibility and context, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may learning outcome, knowledge, skill, responsibility and context be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Learning outcome, knowledge, skill, responsibility and context recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for learning outcome, knowledge, skill, responsibility and context with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
competency-standard-alignment-achievement-level-and-evidence

Competency or standard alignment, achievement level and evidence

External competency references, mapping type, expected and demonstrated proficiency, evaluator, evidence and confidence.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for competency or standard alignment, achievement level and evidence?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes competency or standard alignment, achievement level and evidence, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may competency or standard alignment, achievement level and evidence be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Competency or standard alignment, achievement level and evidence recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for competency or standard alignment, achievement level and evidence with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
assessment-result-and-validationAssessment, result and validation2 findings

External assessment evidence and the decision that it satisfies education rules.

assessment-method-instrument-attempt-evidence-and-integrity

Assessment method, instrument, attempt, evidence and integrity

Assessment reference, method, attempt identity, conditions, assessor, evidence, accommodations, integrity and review status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for assessment method, instrument, attempt, evidence and integrity?evidence
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes assessment method, instrument, attempt, evidence and integrity, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may assessment method, instrument, attempt, evidence and integrity be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Assessment method, instrument, attempt, evidence and integrity recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for assessment method, instrument, attempt, evidence and integrity with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
score-grade-scale-result-status-moderation-and-appeal

Score, grade, scale, result status, moderation and appeal

Original score or grade, scale authority and version, pass decision, finality, moderation, correction, appeal and knowledge time.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for score, grade, scale, result status, moderation and appeal?validation
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes score, grade, scale, result status, moderation and appeal, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may score, grade, scale, result status, moderation and appeal be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Score, grade, scale, result status, moderation and appeal recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for score, grade, scale, result status, moderation and appeal with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
qualification-definition-and-personal-awardQualification definition and personal award2 layers

Separates a reusable qualification from the authoritative decision that one learner earned it.

qualification-definitionQualification definition2 findings

The reusable governed outcome and its requirements, rights and framework references.

qualification-identity-title-type-owner-and-version

Qualification identity, title, type, owner and version

Authoritative qualification identifier, language titles, type, competent owner or awarding body, jurisdiction, version and status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for qualification identity, title, type, owner and version?identity
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes qualification identity, title, type, owner and version, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may qualification identity, title, type, owner and version be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Qualification identity, title, type, owner and version recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for qualification identity, title, type, owner and version with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
requirements-volume-outcomes-level-access-rights-and-limitations

Requirements, volume, outcomes, level, access rights and limitations

Completion requirements, credit or workload, learning outcomes, framework level and stated progression or occupational access with caveats.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for requirements, volume, outcomes, level, access rights and limitations?requirement
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes requirements, volume, outcomes, level, access rights and limitations, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may requirements, volume, outcomes, level, access rights and limitations be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Requirements, volume, outcomes, level, access rights and limitations recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for requirements, volume, outcomes, level, access rights and limitations with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
award-decision-and-conferralAward decision and conferral2 findings

The person-specific validation and effective award state.

award-eligibility-validation-decision-authority-and-evidence

Award eligibility, validation decision, authority and evidence

Learner, qualification and programme references, rule version, completion evidence, decision maker, approval, exceptions and appeal.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for award eligibility, validation decision, authority and evidence?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes award eligibility, validation decision, authority and evidence, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may award eligibility, validation decision, authority and evidence be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Award eligibility, validation decision, authority and evidence recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for award eligibility, validation decision, authority and evidence with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
conferral-date-effective-state-honours-conditions-and-expiry

Conferral date, effective state, honours, conditions and expiry

Award identifier, conferral and effective times, distinction or honours, conditions, expiry if meaningful, successor and withdrawal state.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for conferral date, effective state, honours, conditions and expiry?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes conferral date, effective state, honours, conditions and expiry, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may conferral date, effective state, honours, conditions and expiry be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Conferral date, effective state, honours, conditions and expiry recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for conferral date, effective state, honours, conditions and expiry with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
credential-issuance-proof-and-statusCredential issuance, proof and status2 layers

Represents credentials as portable evidence of education claims with their own lifecycle.

credential-identity-claims-and-proofCredential identity, claims and proof2 findings

Credential subject, issuer, achievement claims, evidence and proof references.

credential-identifier-subject-issuer-schema-and-claims

Credential identifier, subject, issuer, schema and claims

Stable credential identity, privacy-preserving subject binding, issuer and authority, schema, exact award or achievement claims and terms of use.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for credential identifier, subject, issuer, schema and claims?identity
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes credential identifier, subject, issuer, schema and claims, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may credential identifier, subject, issuer, schema and claims be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Credential identifier, subject, issuer, schema and claims recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for credential identifier, subject, issuer, schema and claims with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
criteria-evidence-proof-signature-and-verification-method-reference

Criteria, evidence, proof, signature and verification-method reference

Criteria and evidence links, proof type, signature or verification reference, digest, key status reference and non-claims.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for criteria, evidence, proof, signature and verification-method reference?evidence
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes criteria, evidence, proof, signature and verification-method reference, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may criteria, evidence, proof, signature and verification-method reference be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Criteria, evidence, proof, signature and verification-method reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for criteria, evidence, proof, signature and verification-method reference with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
issuance-correction-reissue-and-revocationIssuance, correction, reissue and revocation2 findings

Credential availability, successors and independently checkable status.

issuance-delivery-holder-control-validity-and-presentation

Issuance, delivery, holder control, validity and presentation

Issue and availability times, recipient channel, holder binding, validity interval, presentation purpose and selective-disclosure limits.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for issuance, delivery, holder control, validity and presentation?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes issuance, delivery, holder control, validity and presentation, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may issuance, delivery, holder control, validity and presentation be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Issuance, delivery, holder control, validity and presentation recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for issuance, delivery, holder control, validity and presentation with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
correction-reissue-suspension-revocation-status-and-tombstone

Correction, reissue, suspension, revocation, status and tombstone

Reason and authority, effective time, predecessor or successor, status service, verification time, privacy protection and durable tombstone.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for correction, reissue, suspension, revocation, status and tombstone?state
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes correction, reissue, suspension, revocation, status and tombstone, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may correction, reissue, suspension, revocation, status and tombstone be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Correction, reissue, suspension, revocation, status and tombstone recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for correction, reissue, suspension, revocation, status and tombstone with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
learner-record-recognition-and-portabilityLearner record, recognition and portability3 layers

Assembles achievements and records how other authorities evaluate or receive them.

transcript-credit-and-progressTranscript, credit and progress2 findings

Ordered achievement sets and original plus mapped measures of progress.

transcript-component-achievement-set-order-and-source

Transcript component, achievement set, order and source

Transcript identity and version, component credentials, source registrars, academic periods, ordering, annotations, seals and correction lineage.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for transcript component, achievement set, order and source?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes transcript component, achievement set, order and source, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may transcript component, achievement set, order and source be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Transcript component, achievement set, order and source recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for transcript component, achievement set, order and source with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
credit-workload-grade-progress-completion-and-incomplete-state

Credit, workload, grade, progress, completion and incomplete state

Original credit system, attempted and earned values, workload, cumulative measures, incomplete or withdrawn status and mapped values with loss.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for credit, workload, grade, progress, completion and incomplete state?measurement
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes credit, workload, grade, progress, completion and incomplete state, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may credit, workload, grade, progress, completion and incomplete state be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Credit, workload, grade, progress, completion and incomplete state recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for credit, workload, grade, progress, completion and incomplete state with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
comparability-recognition-and-downstream-useComparability, recognition and downstream use2 findings

Attributable decisions that interpret a foreign or external qualification for one purpose.

equivalence-comparability-level-map-scope-and-non-equivalence

Equivalence, comparability, level map, scope and non-equivalence

Source and target qualifications or levels, mapping authority, purpose, evidence, result, limitations, confidence and expiry.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for equivalence, comparability, level map, scope and non-equivalence?interoperability
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes equivalence, comparability, level map, scope and non-equivalence, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may equivalence, comparability, level map, scope and non-equivalence be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Equivalence, comparability, level map, scope and non-equivalence recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for equivalence, comparability, level map, scope and non-equivalence with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
recognition-decision-authority-purpose-jurisdiction-and-appeal

Recognition decision, authority, purpose, jurisdiction and appeal

Recognizing body, application, purpose such as admission or employment, jurisdiction, decision, conditions, reason and appeal history.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for recognition decision, authority, purpose, jurisdiction and appeal?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes recognition decision, authority, purpose, jurisdiction and appeal, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may recognition decision, authority, purpose, jurisdiction and appeal be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Recognition decision, authority, purpose, jurisdiction and appeal recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for recognition decision, authority, purpose, jurisdiction and appeal with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
learner-control-and-portable-disclosureLearner control and portable disclosure2 findings

Purpose-bound sharing, sealed records and verification history.

presentation-verification-status-check-and-reliance-history

Presentation, verification, status check and reliance history

Presented credential set, verifier, purpose, checks performed, result, timestamp, disclosed fields and downstream reliance reference.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for presentation, verification, status check and reliance history?provenance
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes presentation, verification, status check and reliance history, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may presentation, verification, status check and reliance history be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Presentation, verification, status check and reliance history recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for presentation, verification, status check and reliance history with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
governance-interoperability-and-agent-operationsGovernance, interoperability and agent operations3 layers

Controls authority, provenance, mappings and safe automated change.

stewardship-provenance-and-qualityStewardship, provenance and quality2 findings

Registrar and awarding authority plus source lineage and data quality.

registrar-awarding-body-issuer-owner-and-steward-authority

Registrar, awarding body, issuer, owner and steward authority

External party references, mandate, role scope, jurisdiction, validity and accountable correction and escalation routes.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for registrar, awarding body, issuer, owner and steward authority?authority
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes registrar, awarding body, issuer, owner and steward authority, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may registrar, awarding body, issuer, owner and steward authority be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Registrar, awarding body, issuer, owner and steward authority recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for registrar, awarding body, issuer, owner and steward authority with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
source-lineage-observation-ingestion-confidence-and-quality

Source lineage, observation, ingestion, confidence and quality

Source system, author, derivation, transformations, event and knowledge times, completeness, conflict and quality checks.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for source lineage, observation, ingestion, confidence and quality?quality
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes source lineage, observation, ingestion, confidence and quality, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may source lineage, observation, ingestion, confidence and quality be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Source lineage, observation, ingestion, confidence and quality recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for source lineage, observation, ingestion, confidence and quality with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
standards-and-loss-aware-mappingsStandards and loss-aware mappings2 findings

Versioned classifier, framework, schema and credential projections.

isced-eqf-national-framework-esco-and-ctdl-projection

ISCED, EQF, national framework, ESCO and CTDL projection

Pinned source and target identifiers and versions, mapping authority, transformed or omitted fields, licence and round-trip limits.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for isced, eqf, national framework, esco and ctdl projection?interoperability
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes isced, eqf, national framework, esco and ctdl projection, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may isced, eqf, national framework, esco and ctdl projection be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • ISCED, EQF, national framework, ESCO and CTDL projection recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for isced, eqf, national framework, esco and ctdl projection with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
clr-open-badges-and-verifiable-credential-projection

CLR, Open Badges and Verifiable Credential projection

Profile versions, required claims, achievement and evidence mapping, proof references, selective disclosure and conformance status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for clr, open badges and verifiable credential projection?interoperability
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes clr, open badges and verifiable credential projection, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may clr, open badges and verifiable credential projection be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • CLR, Open Badges and Verifiable Credential projection recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for clr, open badges and verifiable credential projection with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
safe-agent-control-and-validationSafe agent control and validation2 findings

Authorized operations, invariants, concurrency and recovery.

agent-operation-authority-purpose-preconditions-and-confirmation

Agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation

Classifies register, enrol, assess, award, issue, recognize, disclose, correct and revoke actions as autonomous, propose, confirm or forbidden.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation?security
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
prewrite-postwrite-validation-conflict-concurrency-and-recovery

Pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery

Identity, authority, rule, framework, scale, credit, evidence, time, status, privacy, stale-head and rollback checks with immutable audit evidence.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, codes, scales, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery?validation
    Expected answer
    • value or typed reference
    • authority and version
    • status and valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which learner, institution, registrar, assessor, awarding or recognizing authority and evidence establishes pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery, at what event and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • actor and role
    • authority and source
    • evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery be validated, appealed, corrected, superseded, revoked, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • appeal or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery with learner binding, authority, event and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.

Publication holds

  • Claude and Grok timed out during their bounded attempts, so independent external review is absent and explicitly waived for this published reviewable draft.
  • The boundary among programme, course, assessment, qualification definition, personal award, credential and professional authorization needs later joint taxonomy review.
  • The approved relationship ledger contains no WM-PER-008 rows, so all proposed sibling composition remains draft.
  • National programme, credit, grading, framework, award, recognition, minor-learner, sealed-record, retention and appeal profiles require specialist review.
  • Certified ISCED, EQF, ESCO, CTDL, CLR, Open Badges and Verifiable Credentials mappings, conformance fixtures and licence checks remain unverified.
  • Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft.

Deferred research

  • Approve exact sibling model identities and field ownership for programmes, courses, teaching activities, assessments, skills, occupations, licences and consent.
  • Develop national and sector profiles for credit, workload, grading, qualification frameworks, award powers, recognition, minors, sealed records and retention.
  • Create deterministic fixtures for transfer credit, prior learning, incomplete study, grade correction, award appeal, credential reissue, revocation, name change and selective disclosure.
  • Validate certified ISCED, framework, ESCO, CTDL, CLR, Open Badges and VC projections with licence, disclosure, mapping-loss and round-trip tests.