World Models · Published

Administrative Area

Represent a governed administrative or official statistical territorial unit with stable identity, versioned codes and names, authority, hierarchy, direct boundary geometry and lifecycle independent of storage and interface format.

AI YAMLAGENTS.mdResearch evidence
Published. Research assurance: reviewable-draft. The Codex-only synthesis is published under an explicit repository-owner provider waiver. It passed structural validation and a separate no-tools adversarial audit, but remains a reviewable draft until independent second-provider review and the holds below are closed.
Catalogue IDWM-PLC-004
Version0.3.0-research.1
Previous version-
Typeentity
ValidationPassed
Synthesis digestsha256:ea8184c4bc4497b7…
10Sources
6Bundles
12Layers
24Findings
72Questions
24Artifacts
Format-independent logical structure

Bundles → Layers → Findings → Questions + Artifacts

identity-codes-names-and-classIdentity, codes, names and class2 layers

Identifies one administrative unit in its authoritative system and distinguishes its names and external code projections.

master-identity-and-code-systemsMaster identity and code systems2 findings

Stable identity, source register and versioned codes.

authoritative-unit-identifier-register-and-issuing-authority

Authoritative unit identifier, register and issuing authority

Stable unit identifier, namespace, master register, issuing authority, resolution state and aliases.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for authoritative unit identifier, register and issuing authority?identity
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes authoritative unit identifier, register and issuing authority, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may authoritative unit identifier, register and issuing authority be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Authoritative unit identifier, register and issuing authority recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for authoritative unit identifier, register and issuing authority with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
national-iso-m49-nuts-salb-and-local-code-bindings

National, ISO, M49, NUTS, SALB and local code bindings

Code-list identity, part or scheme, edition, code, validity, issuer, mapping scope and retired-code successor.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for national, iso, m49, nuts, salb and local code bindings?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes national, iso, m49, nuts, salb and local code bindings, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may national, iso, m49, nuts, salb and local code bindings be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • National, ISO, M49, NUTS, SALB and local code bindings recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for national, iso, m49, nuts, salb and local code bindings with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
unit-class-level-and-namesUnit class, level and names2 findings

Administrative classification and multilingual naming history.

administrative-unit-type-level-order-and-classification

Administrative-unit type, level, order and classification

Jurisdiction-defined type and level, hierarchy order, official or statistical status, class criteria and version.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for administrative-unit type, level, order and classification?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes administrative-unit type, level, order and classification, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may administrative-unit type, level, order and classification be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Administrative-unit type, level, order and classification recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for administrative-unit type, level, order and classification with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
official-short-long-multilingual-historic-and-variant-names

Official, short, long, multilingual, historic and variant names

Language, script, name type, authority, valid interval, transliteration, pronunciation and deprecated forms.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for official, short, long, multilingual, historic and variant names?definition
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes official, short, long, multilingual, historic and variant names, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may official, short, long, multilingual, historic and variant names be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Official, short, long, multilingual, historic and variant names recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for official, short, long, multilingual, historic and variant names with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
authority-hierarchy-and-jurisdiction-contextAuthority, hierarchy and jurisdiction context2 layers

Connects the unit to constitutive authority and several non-equivalent hierarchy relations.

constitutive-authority-and-instrumentConstitutive authority and instrument2 findings

Legal or official basis and the organization exercising competence.

government-organization-seat-capacity-and-competence-reference

Government organization, seat, capacity and competence reference

External governing organization and seat references, role or capacity, competence domain, delegation and validity.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for government organization, seat, capacity and competence reference?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes government organization, seat, capacity and competence reference, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may government organization, seat, capacity and competence reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Government organization, seat, capacity and competence reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for government organization, seat, capacity and competence reference with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
administrative-and-spatial-hierarchyAdministrative and spatial hierarchy2 findings

Versioned parent, containment and grouping relations.

administrative-parent-child-predecessor-and-sibling-relations

Administrative parent, child, predecessor and sibling relations

Typed hierarchy edges, authority, level consistency, valid time, exceptions and successor lineage.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for administrative parent, child, predecessor and sibling relations?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes administrative parent, child, predecessor and sibling relations, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may administrative parent, child, predecessor and sibling relations be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Administrative parent, child, predecessor and sibling relations recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for administrative parent, child, predecessor and sibling relations with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
geometric-containment-statistical-region-and-overlap-relations

Geometric containment, statistical region and overlap relations

Spatial containment or overlap and statistical grouping links kept separate from administrative subordination.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for geometric containment, statistical region and overlap relations?spatial
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes geometric containment, statistical region and overlap relations, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may geometric containment, statistical region and overlap relations be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Geometric containment, statistical region and overlap relations recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for geometric containment, statistical region and overlap relations with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
boundaries-geometry-topology-and-extentBoundaries, geometry, topology and extent2 layers

Represents competing territorial extents with the coordinate and topology context needed to interpret them.

boundary-assertions-and-recognitionBoundary assertions and recognition2 findings

Source-qualified official, statistical, claimed, disputed and de facto extents.

official-statistical-claimed-disputed-and-de-facto-boundary

Official, statistical, claimed, disputed and de facto boundary

Geometry role, asserting authority, recognition audience, basis, effective interval, confidence and conflict set.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for official, statistical, claimed, disputed and de facto boundary?spatial
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes official, statistical, claimed, disputed and de facto boundary, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may official, statistical, claimed, disputed and de facto boundary be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Official, statistical, claimed, disputed and de facto boundary recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for official, statistical, claimed, disputed and de facto boundary with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
boundary-segment-point-source-demarcation-and-agreement

Boundary segment, point, source, demarcation and agreement

Ordered components, monuments or natural features, source survey or treaty, demarcation state and neighboring-party agreement.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for boundary segment, point, source, demarcation and agreement?composition
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes boundary segment, point, source, demarcation and agreement, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may boundary segment, point, source, demarcation and agreement be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Boundary segment, point, source, demarcation and agreement recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for boundary segment, point, source, demarcation and agreement with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
geometry-crs-topology-and-measuresGeometry, CRS, topology and measures2 findings

Coordinate semantics, special topology and measured extents.

geometry-crs-axis-order-dimensionality-precision-and-accuracy

Geometry, CRS, axis order, dimensionality, precision and accuracy

Geometry primitive, native CRS, axis order, coordinate epoch, dimensionality, transformation, precision, scale and accuracy.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for geometry, crs, axis order, dimensionality, precision and accuracy?measurement
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes geometry, crs, axis order, dimensionality, precision and accuracy, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may geometry, crs, axis order, dimensionality, precision and accuracy be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Geometry, CRS, axis order, dimensionality, precision and accuracy recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for geometry, crs, axis order, dimensionality, precision and accuracy with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
area-coastline-enclave-exclave-hole-adjacency-and-topology

Area, coastline, enclave, exclave, hole, adjacency and topology

Official and calculated area, unit and method, coastline rule, parts, holes, enclaves, exclaves, neighbors, overlap and gap checks.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for area, coastline, enclave, exclave, hole, adjacency and topology?spatial
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes area, coastline, enclave, exclave, hole, adjacency and topology, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may area, coastline, enclave, exclave, hole, adjacency and topology be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Area, coastline, enclave, exclave, hole, adjacency and topology recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for area, coastline, enclave, exclave, hole, adjacency and topology with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
lifecycle-change-and-lineageLifecycle, change and lineage2 layers

Preserves creation, modification and replacement of administrative units.

state-and-bitemporal-effectivityState and bitemporal effectivity2 findings

Current and historic state with separate legal and knowledge time.

proposed-active-suspended-disputed-superseded-and-abolished-state

Proposed, active, suspended, disputed, superseded and abolished state

Profile-qualified state, deciding authority, reason, effective interval, publication, contest and observation status.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for proposed, active, suspended, disputed, superseded and abolished state?state
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes proposed, active, suspended, disputed, superseded and abolished state, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may proposed, active, suspended, disputed, superseded and abolished state be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Proposed, active, suspended, disputed, superseded and abolished state recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for proposed, active, suspended, disputed, superseded and abolished state with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
territorial-and-classification-changeTerritorial and classification change2 findings

Authorized transformations and identity consequences.

creation-split-merger-transfer-annexation-and-boundary-adjustment

Creation, split, merger, transfer, annexation and boundary adjustment

Change case, parties, instrument, predecessor and successor units, transferred extent, population reference, approval and effect.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for creation, split, merger, transfer, annexation and boundary adjustment?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes creation, split, merger, transfer, annexation and boundary adjustment, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may creation, split, merger, transfer, annexation and boundary adjustment be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Creation, split, merger, transfer, annexation and boundary adjustment recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for creation, split, merger, transfer, annexation and boundary adjustment with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
renaming-recoding-reclassification-successor-and-tombstone

Renaming, recoding, reclassification, successor and tombstone

Whether identity persists, code and name changes, old-to-new mappings, successor proportions and durable historic resolution.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for renaming, recoding, reclassification, successor and tombstone?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes renaming, recoding, reclassification, successor and tombstone, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may renaming, recoding, reclassification, successor and tombstone be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Renaming, recoding, reclassification, successor and tombstone recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for renaming, recoding, reclassification, successor and tombstone with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
place-context-statistics-and-disputesPlace context, statistics and disputes2 layers

Links administrative units to places, functional zones, observations and recognition disputes without importing their masters.

places-zones-and-functional-contextPlaces, zones and functional context2 findings

External settlement and service-area relations.

settlement-locality-address-parcel-and-building-reference

Settlement, locality, address, parcel and building reference

Typed external place and feature links, relation basis, containment or service semantics, time and uncertainty.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for settlement, locality, address, parcel and building reference?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes settlement, locality, address, parcel and building reference, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may settlement, locality, address, parcel and building reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Settlement, locality, address, parcel and building reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for settlement, locality, address, parcel and building reference with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
postal-electoral-service-planning-timezone-and-jurisdiction-reference

Postal, electoral, service, planning, timezone and jurisdiction reference

External zones and legal or functional jurisdictions with independent geometry, authority and lifecycle.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for postal, electoral, service, planning, timezone and jurisdiction reference?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes postal, electoral, service, planning, timezone and jurisdiction reference, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may postal, electoral, service, planning, timezone and jurisdiction reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Postal, electoral, service, planning, timezone and jurisdiction reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for postal, electoral, service, planning, timezone and jurisdiction reference with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
statistics-observations-and-recognition-conflictStatistics, observations and recognition conflict2 findings

Time-qualified measures and competing sovereignty or status claims.

population-area-statistic-indicator-reference-time-and-method

Population, area, statistic, indicator, reference time and method

External observation or dataset, population concept, reference date, geography version, method, estimate status and uncertainty.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for population, area, statistic, indicator, reference time and method?measurement
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes population, area, statistic, indicator, reference time and method, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may population, area, statistic, indicator, reference time and method be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Population, area, statistic, indicator, reference time and method recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for population, area, statistic, indicator, reference time and method with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
territorial-claim-recognition-status-dispute-and-neutral-display

Territorial claim, recognition status, dispute and neutral display

Claimant, claimed extent, basis, recognizing party, scope, valid time, dispute record and purpose-specific neutral-display rule.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for territorial claim, recognition status, dispute and neutral display?provenance
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes territorial claim, recognition status, dispute and neutral display, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may territorial claim, recognition status, dispute and neutral display be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Territorial claim, recognition status, dispute and neutral display recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for territorial claim, recognition status, dispute and neutral display with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
interoperability-governance-and-agent-operationsInteroperability, governance and agent operations2 layers

Controls mappings, provenance, disclosure and safe automated maintenance.

classifiers-projections-and-accessClassifiers, projections and access2 findings

Versioned code and geospatial projections with purpose controls.

iso-m49-nuts-salb-inspire-gml-geosparql-and-geojson-projection

ISO, M49, NUTS, SALB, INSPIRE, GML, GeoSPARQL and GeoJSON projection

Source and target versions, code and geometry mappings, hierarchy scope, transformed fields, omissions and round-trip limits.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for iso, m49, nuts, salb, inspire, gml, geosparql and geojson projection?interoperability
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes iso, m49, nuts, salb, inspire, gml, geosparql and geojson projection, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may iso, m49, nuts, salb, inspire, gml, geosparql and geojson projection be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • ISO, M49, NUTS, SALB, INSPIRE, GML, GeoSPARQL and GeoJSON projection recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for iso, m49, nuts, salb, inspire, gml, geosparql and geojson projection with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
public-map-statistical-restricted-and-dispute-sensitive-view

Public map, statistical, restricted and dispute-sensitive view

Purpose, audience, boundary role, name and code policy, precision, masking, attribution, expiry and inference risk.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for public map, statistical, restricted and dispute-sensitive view?access
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes public map, statistical, restricted and dispute-sensitive view, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may public map, statistical, restricted and dispute-sensitive view be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Public map, statistical, restricted and dispute-sensitive view recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for public map, statistical, restricted and dispute-sensitive view with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
safe-agent-control-and-validationSafe agent control and validation2 findings

Authorized operations, invariants, concurrency and audit.

agent-operation-authority-purpose-preconditions-and-confirmation

Agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation

Classifies register, rename, recode, reparent, change boundary, merge, split, disclose and retire operations as autonomous, propose, confirm or forbidden.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation?security
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for agent operation authority, purpose, preconditions and confirmation with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
prewrite-postwrite-validation-conflict-concurrency-and-recovery

Pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery

Identity, code, authority, hierarchy, CRS, topology, legal time, lineage, dispute, access and stale-head checks with rollback evidence.

Questions
  1. What exact identifiers, codes, names, geometry qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery?validation
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • authority and version
    • valid time
    • unknowns
  2. Which register, government, statistical authority, source and evidence establishes pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery, at what legal, observation and knowledge time, and for which recognition scope?evidence
    Expected answer
    • source
    • authority
    • times
    • recognition scope
    • evidence
  3. How may pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing history or conflating hierarchy, geometry and authority?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation
    • contest route
    • successor
    • access and retention
Artifacts
  • Pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for pre-write and post-write validation, conflict, concurrency and recovery with authority, legal and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.

Publication holds

  • Claude and Grok timed out during their bounded attempts, so independent external review is absent and explicitly waived for this published reviewable draft.
  • The approved relationship ledger contains no WM-PLC-004 rows, so all proposed sibling composition remains draft.
  • Jurisdiction-specific local-government law, sovereignty, indigenous and customary territory, maritime, historical and conflict-sensitive profiles require specialist review.
  • Certified ISO 3166, ISO 19112, M49, SALB, INSPIRE, NUTS, GML, GeoSPARQL and GeoJSON crosswalks and conformance fixtures remain unverified.
  • Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft.

Deferred research

  • Approve identifiers and relation cardinalities for government, jurisdiction, place, address, zone, parcel, statistic and dispute models.
  • Develop jurisdiction, historical, maritime, indigenous, customary, occupied and conflict-sensitive administrative-area profiles.
  • Create fixtures for hierarchy cycles, wrong code editions, multilingual renaming, enclaves, exclaves, disputed boundaries, split, merger and retroactive effect.
  • Validate certified code, hierarchy and geometry projections with recognition, CRS, topology, loss and round-trip tests.