# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-06T22:57:27Z", "synthesisSha256": "804a6aedc2397cc683524467d72df961ebe010426f0332ff0adb7154240bc8e8", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-PLC-007", "registryId": "vr.wm-plc-007", "name": "Maritime Zone", "version": "1.0.0", "previousVersions": [], "entryKind": "entity", "family": "World Models", "category": "Physical world and living systems", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "PHY.PLC.MAR" ], "tags": [ "maritime", "zone", "phy.plc.mar" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-plc-007-maritime-zone/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-plc-007", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-plc-007", "model_id": "WM-PLC-007", "name": "Maritime Zone", "entry_kind": "entity", "purpose": "Describe a legally defined maritime area through attributed limits, regime assertions and evidence, preserving uncertainty and competing claims.", "scope_statement": "One persistent maritime zone subject, represented through attributed legal assertions and versioned spatial depictions. Core coverage concerns national maritime zones and their limits; specially designated overlays and areas beyond national jurisdiction can be referenced but require additional profiles. This research design is not a boundary adjudicator, official chart, permission engine or implementation.", "in_scope": [ "Stable zone identity, classifications, legal-basis assertions and role-qualified authority references", "Baseline dependencies, domain-qualified limits, geometry revisions, uncertainty and derived measurements", "Rights and duties references, passage and overlay links, delimitation status and competing claims", "Temporal continuity, source publicity and deposit evidence, proposed diagnostic and exchange operations" ], "out_of_scope": [ "State, authority, legal instrument and jurisdiction master lifecycles; determining sovereignty, legal competence or validity", "Airspace operations, vessel navigation, ocean observations and surveys, fisheries licensing and conservation management", "Creating or depositing official claims, treaty negotiation, court adjudication, enforcement, detention and controlled-item operations", "Universal rules for coastline change, automatic continental shelf entitlement computation, exhaustive high-seas or Area regimes and current national claims catalogue" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-POL-015 Jurisdiction", "distinction": "Candidate reference for separately mastered authority scope. This model binds a zone, domain and cited regime assertion; it does not evaluate competence or enforce rules.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-PLC-008 Airspace", "distinction": "Airspace volume and operations remain separate. Maritime assertions may reference associated airspace effects; excluding its master does not deny those legal relationships.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-EAR-010 Ocean / Marine State", "distinction": "Measurements may support baseline or shelf evidence, but physical ocean state and observation lifecycle are externally mastered.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "neighbor": "Legal instrument and geographic feature masters", "distinction": "Store versioned references and local applicability rather than copying legal enactment, survey, island or installation lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea", "organization": "United Nations", "url": "https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201833/volume-1833-A-31363-English.pdf", "version_or_date": "1982-12-10; UN Treaty Series volume 1833, 1994 publication", "source_type": "legislation", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:55:25Z", "relevance": "Selected articles 1-17, 33, 46-58, 60, 74-84, 86 and 121 support qualified zone categories, baselines, rights, delimitation and publicity. Treaty text available through browser PDF extraction; OCR errors and current application require review." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "Maritime claims - collection and disclaimer", "organization": "United Nations", "url": "https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/claims.htm", "version_or_date": "Undated web collection; indexed evidence reviewed 2026-10-07; current completeness unverified", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:55:25Z", "relevance": "Indexed official disclaimer supports treating publication and registration as evidence, not recognition or a validity judgment. Full page retrieval failed." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries product register", "organization": "International Hydrographic Organization", "url": "https://registry.iho.int/productspec/view.do?category=product_ID&domainS=ALL&idx=177&product_ID=S-121&searchValue=&statusS=5", "version_or_date": "Edition 1.0.0; register version date 2019-10-29; implementation and testing only", "source_type": "registry", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:55:25Z", "relevance": "Official register identifies exchange scope, edition, S-100 dependency and absence of portrayal. Product archive and feature catalogue were not downloaded; no conformance claim." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "U.S. Maritime Limits and Boundaries", "organization": "National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration", "url": "https://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/data/us-maritime-limits-and-boundaries.html", "version_or_date": "Undated live guidance; browser reviewed 2026-10-07; dataset edition not pinned", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:55:25Z", "relevance": "National example of chart-derived baselines, updates, differing statutory uses of EEZ terminology and boundary metadata. These practices are not universal legal rules." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "OGC GeoSPARQL - A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data", "organization": "Open Geospatial Consortium", "url": "https://docs.ogc.org/is/22-047r1/22-047r1.html", "version_or_date": "Version 1.1; document 22-047r1; publication date 2024-01-29", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:55:25Z", "relevance": "Feature/geometry separation, coordinate reference systems, geometry serialization and topological relations support a conceptual spatial exchange alignment, not maritime legal determination." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2013-04-30", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:55:25Z", "relevance": "Entity, attribution, derivation, generation and revision terms support evidence lineage. Provenance does not establish legal validity or truth." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Maritime space: maritime zones and maritime delimitation - legislation and treaties collection", "organization": "United Nations", "url": "https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/", "version_or_date": "Undated collection introduction; indexed evidence reviewed 2026-10-07", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:55:25Z", "relevance": "Official indexed scope describes deposits of charts or coordinate lists with geodetic datum and due-publicity materials. Full page retrieval failed; individual deposits unverified." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "bundle-identity", "name": "Zone identity and legal basis", "description": "Identify a persistent legal spatial subject and its attributed basis.", "rationale": "Zone identity must survive revisions without merging rival assertions or equating a map feature with legal authority.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-identity", "name": "Identity and classification", "description": "Context and evidence for qualified zone identity. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-identity", "name": "Qualified zone identity", "description": "Proposed stable zone identity with names, classification scheme, assertion context and linked representations. A category and state name alone are not a unique identifier.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "identity-q1", "text": "Which master identifier and issuer namespace identify this zone independently of its current geometry?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "zone identifier", "issuer namespace", "aliases" ] }, { "id": "identity-q2", "text": "Which zone class and vocabulary revision describe the record, and is it a national maritime zone or a separately designated overlay?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "class code", "scheme revision", "overlay flag" ] }, { "id": "identity-q3", "text": "Which water, seabed, subsoil and associated airspace regimes does this record address or reference?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "vertical domain", "linked regime identifiers", "excluded domains" ] }, { "id": "identity-q4", "text": "Which claimant or descriptive perspective qualifies this identity when several assertions concern the same area?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "asserting party reference", "perspective", "assertion identifier" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "identity-data-1", "name": "Zone identifier", "description": "Stable identifier qualified by its assigning namespace.", "value_kind": "identifier", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "identity-data-2", "name": "Classification", "description": "Versioned class and legal domain; unknown or disputed values must remain explicit.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "identity-data-3", "name": "Assertion context", "description": "Attribution, aliases and related competing assertions; a neutral descriptive record need not have a national claimant.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-identity", "name": "Zone identity record", "description": "Versioned evidence for qualified zone identity. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-basis", "name": "Legal basis and authority", "description": "Context and evidence for attributed basis for the zone. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-basis", "name": "Attributed basis for the zone", "description": "Keep an instrument, customary-law assertion, judgment or other claimed basis with its scope and review state. Neither a dataset custodian nor an ingestion event establishes competence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "basis-q1", "text": "What provision or other legal basis is asserted for this zone, and who made that assertion?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "basis reference", "provision locator", "asserting authority", "review state" ] }, { "id": "basis-q2", "text": "Which authority administers the zone data, and how is that role distinguished from the claimant and the adopting Dimension owner?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "data steward", "claimant", "Dimension owner", "delegation evidence" ] }, { "id": "basis-q3", "text": "Which jurisdiction and treaty-application assumptions must a reviewer confirm before relying on the basis?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "applicability profile", "party status check", "national instrument", "reviewer" ] }, { "id": "basis-q4", "text": "How is an inherent entitlement or an incompletely documented basis represented without inventing a constitutive proclamation?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "basis type", "unknown evidence", "qualification" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "basis-data-1", "name": "Basis assertions", "description": "One or more attributed basis assertions, including unresolved status; a proclamation is not universally required.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "basis-data-2", "name": "Authority bindings", "description": "Separate legal authority, claimant, data custodian and local owner references with validity intervals.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "basis-data-3", "name": "Applicability profile", "description": "Selected legal regime, assumptions and qualified reviewer status.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-basis", "name": "Legal basis dossier", "description": "Versioned evidence for attributed basis for the zone. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-extent", "name": "Baselines and spatial extent", "description": "Bind legal limit descriptions to their spatial representations.", "rationale": "A closed polygon alone cannot preserve the origin, domain and interpretation of a maritime limit.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-baselines", "name": "Baseline dependencies", "description": "Context and evidence for baseline and coastal feature references. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-baselines", "name": "Baseline and coastal feature references", "description": "Record the baseline system and source revision used by an extent assertion. Natural features, low-tide elevations and artificial structures require different legal treatment; eligibility is reviewed externally.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "baselines-q1", "text": "Which normal, straight, archipelagic or other legally specified baseline method supports each limit segment?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "baseline method", "legal provision", "segment reference" ] }, { "id": "baselines-q2", "text": "Which chart, coordinate list and coastal feature revisions support the selected baseline?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "chart edition", "coordinate-list reference", "feature identifiers", "source dates" ] }, { "id": "baselines-q3", "text": "Which datum, tidal reference and eligible coastal feature classification are stated, missing or contested?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "geodetic datum", "tidal reference", "feature classification", "uncertainty" ] }, { "id": "baselines-q4", "text": "What reviewed change rule applies if the observed coast changes while the deposited or legally described baseline remains the same?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "change rule", "legal review", "observation reference", "affected limits" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "baselines-data-1", "name": "Baseline bindings", "description": "Segment-level references to source baselines; use an explicit not-applicable basis for overlays unrelated to distance baselines.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "baselines-data-2", "name": "Feature evidence", "description": "Referenced feature classification and chart or survey evidence; does not own the survey lifecycle.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "baselines-data-3", "name": "Change policy", "description": "Profile-specific treatment of baseline change, pending review and downstream dependencies.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-baselines", "name": "Baseline dependency schedule", "description": "Versioned evidence for baseline and coastal feature references. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-limits", "name": "Limits and geometry", "description": "Context and evidence for versioned limit representation. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-limits", "name": "Versioned limit representation", "description": "Retain legal segment descriptions and source coordinates alongside derived geometry. Qualify breadth, area and accuracy with method, units and provenance; missing geometry does not prove that no zone exists.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "limits-q1", "text": "Which segments are outer limits, agreed boundaries, provisional lines or merely cartographic closures?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "segment roles", "line definitions", "closure rationale" ] }, { "id": "limits-q2", "text": "Which coordinate reference system, axis order, epoch where relevant and coordinate units accompany the representation?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "CRS identifier", "axis order", "epoch", "units" ] }, { "id": "limits-q3", "text": "What breadth or area is stated or computed, using which baseline, ellipsoid, interpolation method and uncertainty?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "quantity", "units", "baseline revision", "method", "uncertainty" ] }, { "id": "limits-q4", "text": "How are disconnected areas, holes, antimeridian crossings and incomplete limits preserved without fabricating a legally closed polygon?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "geometry components", "topology checks", "incomplete extent flag", "rejection reason" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "limits-data-1", "name": "Limit segments", "description": "Ordered or graph-linked segment definitions, roles and source coordinate sequences.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "limits-data-2", "name": "Geometry versions", "description": "Source or derived geometry with CRS, algorithm, datum transformation lineage and quality state.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "limits-data-3", "name": "Extent measurements", "description": "Quantity, units, precision, method, revision and stated versus computed origin.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-limits", "name": "Limit geometry package", "description": "Versioned evidence for versioned limit representation. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-regime", "name": "Rights and activity context", "description": "Express zone-specific regime assertions and linked activity rules.", "rationale": "The model must not equate different kinds of jurisdiction or derive permission from location.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-rights", "name": "Regime assertions", "description": "Context and evidence for rights, duties and vertical domains. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-rights", "name": "Rights, duties and vertical domains", "description": "Distinguish sovereignty, sovereign rights and subject-specific jurisdiction. A shelf entitlement does not determine the regime of the waters or air above it. Keep domain and activity qualifications attached.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "rights-q1", "text": "Which rights or duties are asserted for each spatial domain and subject matter?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "rights assertion", "domain", "subject matter", "basis" ] }, { "id": "rights-q2", "text": "Which rights of other states or users and due-regard obligations qualify the local regime description?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "countervailing rights", "obligations", "provision references" ] }, { "id": "rights-q3", "text": "What evidence distinguishes shelf rights from water-column rights when their mapped horizontal extents overlap?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "shelf reference", "water regime reference", "domain-specific basis" ] }, { "id": "rights-q4", "text": "Which missing qualification makes an activity-level legal conclusion unavailable?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "missing profile input", "unresolved provision", "review status" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "rights-data-1", "name": "Regime assertions", "description": "Attributed rights and duties by subject, beneficiary, spatial domain and effective interval.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "rights-data-2", "name": "Qualification references", "description": "Exceptions, countervailing rights and authoritative interpretation references.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "rights-data-3", "name": "Legal conclusion status", "description": "Unknown, disputed or reviewed for a stated purpose; no universal authorization boolean.", "value_kind": "code", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-rights", "name": "Regime assertion matrix", "description": "Versioned evidence for rights, duties and vertical domains. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-overlays", "name": "Passage and designated overlays", "description": "Context and evidence for linked special regimes and restrictions. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-overlays", "name": "Linked special regimes and restrictions", "description": "Link passage regimes and separately designated areas without replacing the underlying zone. Fishing, conservation and installation safety rules need their own effective instruments and spatial scope.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "overlays-q1", "text": "Which passage regime or special area designation is linked to this zone and what instrument supports the link?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "regime reference", "designation reference", "instrument" ] }, { "id": "overlays-q2", "text": "What activity, affected class and effective interval qualify a linked restriction or exception?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "activity scope", "affected class", "effective interval", "exceptions" ] }, { "id": "overlays-q3", "text": "Which publication or notice evidence accompanies an asserted temporary change to a passage regime?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "notice reference", "publication evidence", "effective condition" ] }, { "id": "overlays-q4", "text": "Which competent review is needed when overlapping regimes appear inconsistent, before any operational action?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "conflict description", "responsible review role", "external case reference" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "overlays-data-1", "name": "Overlay links", "description": "Separate designation and passage-rule references with local applicability parameters; detailed fisheries and protection profiles remain external.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "overlays-data-2", "name": "Restriction assertions", "description": "Evidence-qualified policy descriptions only; no enforcement instructions or route-clearance decisions.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "overlays-data-3", "name": "Review referral", "description": "Reference to a separately mastered legal or administrative review.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-overlays", "name": "Special regime reference register", "description": "Versioned evidence for linked special regimes and restrictions. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-relations", "name": "Delimitation and competing claims", "description": "Preserve attributed boundaries and unresolved alternatives.", "rationale": "A mapped intersection, official publication and final interstate settlement are distinct kinds of evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-delimitation", "name": "Boundary arrangements", "description": "Context and evidence for segment-specific delimitation status. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-delimitation", "name": "Segment-specific delimitation status", "description": "Describe each boundary segment through its cited agreement, decision or provisional arrangement, including matters left unresolved. Delimitation and the determination of an outer limit are separate questions.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ], "questions": [ { "id": "delimitation-q1", "text": "Which parties and instrument establish or assert the status of each boundary segment?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "parties", "instrument reference", "segment identifier" ] }, { "id": "delimitation-q2", "text": "Is the segment agreed, adjudicated, provisional, claimed, undelimited or unknown according to the cited evidence?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "status vocabulary", "evidence", "scope of status" ] }, { "id": "delimitation-q3", "text": "Which effective-date, entry-into-force or implementation conditions qualify reliance on the boundary instrument?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "conditions", "effective interval", "verification status" ] }, { "id": "delimitation-q4", "text": "Which adjacent areas or legal domains are expressly excluded from this delimitation?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "excluded segments", "excluded domains", "without-prejudice clause reference" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "delimitation-data-1", "name": "Delimitation assertions", "description": "Status by segment and domain; there is no mandatory single settled/disputed flag for the whole zone.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "delimitation-data-2", "name": "Arrangement references", "description": "Separate treaty, judgment or provisional arrangement masters and applicability qualifications.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "delimitation-data-3", "name": "Unresolved coverage", "description": "Uncovered segments, legal domains and outstanding review questions.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-delimitation", "name": "Boundary arrangement schedule", "description": "Versioned evidence for segment-specific delimitation status. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-claims", "name": "Overlap and recognition", "description": "Context and evidence for competing spatial assertions. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-claims", "name": "Competing spatial assertions", "description": "Maintain incompatible claims side by side with provenance. Geometric overlap is a candidate relationship; publication, registration or silence does not settle validity or recognition.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "claims-q1", "text": "Which separately attributed claims overlap, and which geometry revisions produced the overlap result?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "claim references", "revision identifiers", "intersection evidence" ] }, { "id": "claims-q2", "text": "What objection, recognition or reservation is actually documented, by whom and for which part of the claim?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "statement reference", "speaker", "scope", "date" ] }, { "id": "claims-q3", "text": "How are conflicting official depictions retained without silently selecting one as the authoritative world boundary?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "parallel representations", "selection policy", "display qualification" ] }, { "id": "claims-q4", "text": "What limitations must accompany a public depiction of an unresolved claim or an incomplete recognition record?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "display notice", "attribution requirements", "completeness caveat" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "claims-data-1", "name": "Competing assertion links", "description": "References to rival or overlapping assertions, retaining separate identities and review states.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "claims-data-2", "name": "Recognition evidence", "description": "Explicitly attributed statements with scope; absent evidence means unknown, not acquiescence.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "claims-data-3", "name": "Depiction policy", "description": "Neutral attribution and limitations for selected representations.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-claims", "name": "Competing claims evidence register", "description": "Versioned evidence for competing spatial assertions. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-continuity", "name": "Time, publicity and evidence", "description": "Track how records change and what was actually published or deposited.", "rationale": "Legal time, knowledge time and data revision must remain distinguishable.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-time", "name": "Validity and revision", "description": "Context and evidence for temporal continuity of assertions. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-time", "name": "Temporal continuity of assertions", "description": "Use separately qualified legal-effect, publication, observation and ingestion times. A revised dataset can correct a depiction without changing a legal zone, and a legal change can precede a dataset update.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "time-q1", "text": "What legal effective interval is asserted for this zone representation and how precise is the source time?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "effective interval", "source precision", "basis" ] }, { "id": "time-q2", "text": "When was the underlying change observed, published and ingested into this record?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "observation time", "publication time", "ingestion timestamp" ] }, { "id": "time-q3", "text": "Does a new revision correct data, replace geometry, change a legal assertion or supersede the represented subject?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "change kind", "predecessor", "successor", "review decision" ] }, { "id": "time-q4", "text": "Which former version answers an as-of query when later knowledge corrects an earlier depiction?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "valid time", "recorded time", "revision selection", "uncertainty" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "time-data-1", "name": "Temporal assertions", "description": "Effective intervals with evidence and precision; date-only legal sources stay date-only rather than invented midnight instants.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "time-data-2", "name": "Revision lineage", "description": "Predecessor and successor references, change rationale, recorded time and review status.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "time-data-3", "name": "Retirement state", "description": "Locally superseded or retired record state is distinct from termination of a legal regime.", "value_kind": "code", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-time", "name": "Temporal revision ledger", "description": "Versioned evidence for temporal continuity of assertions. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-publicity", "name": "Evidence and publicity", "description": "Context and evidence for publication and deposit evidence. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-publicity", "name": "Publication and deposit evidence", "description": "Keep a source chart or coordinate list, its cited legal context and evidence of publicity or deposit as distinct records. A deposit may document an assertion without endorsing its validity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "publicity-q1", "text": "Which official chart, coordinate list or notice is cited and which exact edition or locator was inspected?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "source identifier", "edition", "locator", "inspection record" ] }, { "id": "publicity-q2", "text": "What deposit or due-publicity requirement is asserted as applicable, and what evidence supports its completion or unknown state?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "applicable provision", "deposit receipt", "notice", "verification status" ] }, { "id": "publicity-q3", "text": "What transformation or transcription connects the original source to the local representation?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "source digest", "derivation steps", "responsible role", "quality review" ] }, { "id": "publicity-q4", "text": "Which license, disclosure or retention rule limits redistribution of the source and its derived artifacts?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "license reference", "access class", "retention policy", "disposal hold" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "publicity-data-1", "name": "Source references", "description": "Original issuer, stable identifier, edition, language and claim locator.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "publicity-data-2", "name": "Publicity evidence", "description": "Deposit or publication references, receipt and applicability status, with unknown and not-applicable distinct.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "publicity-data-3", "name": "Evidence handling", "description": "Digest, lawful access, retention and transformation lineage; a digest proves byte continuity only.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-publicity", "name": "Source and publicity dossier", "description": "Versioned evidence for publication and deposit evidence. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-use", "name": "Qualified spatial use and exchange", "description": "Define the limits of local checking and interoperable representations.", "rationale": "Research structure can support cautious local operations without being an implemented geographic or legal engine.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-spatial-check", "name": "Position and quality checks", "description": "Context and evidence for qualified position-to-zone relation. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-spatial-check", "name": "Qualified position-to-zone relation", "description": "A proposed diagnostic relates a supplied position to selected geometries. Return boundary or indeterminate states when precision, time, domain or data completeness prevents a reliable relation; no permission follows.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "spatial-check-q1", "text": "Which position, spatial domain, time and candidate zone revisions define the requested relation?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "position", "position CRS", "domain", "as-of time", "zone revisions" ] }, { "id": "spatial-check-q2", "text": "Which algorithm and positional uncertainties govern a result near a boundary or a discontinuity?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "algorithm version", "tolerance policy", "position uncertainty", "boundary uncertainty" ] }, { "id": "spatial-check-q3", "text": "Which conditions require refusal or an indeterminate result instead of a yes-or-no jurisdiction claim?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "missing datum", "stale geometry", "incomplete boundary", "unresolved claim" ] }, { "id": "spatial-check-q4", "text": "How is the diagnostic labeled so users do not treat it as navigation clearance or an activity authorization?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "use limitation", "responsible reviewer", "downstream purpose" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "spatial-check-data-1", "name": "Query context", "description": "Inputs and chosen evidence perspective; no vessel tracking collection is implied.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "spatial-check-data-2", "name": "Relation diagnostic", "description": "Inside, outside, boundary, multiple candidates, indeterminate or refused, with method and qualifications.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "spatial-check-data-3", "name": "Quality evidence", "description": "Input and algorithm versions, uncertainty, failure conditions and provenance.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-spatial-check", "name": "Spatial relation diagnostic", "description": "Versioned evidence for qualified position-to-zone relation. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-exchange", "name": "Exchange and review gates", "description": "Context and evidence for versioned external mappings. These fields are proposed research design, not a normative external schema.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-exchange", "name": "Versioned external mappings", "description": "S-121 is a candidate exchange alignment with an implementation/testing qualification for Edition 1.0.0. Geometry and provenance mappings require explicit versions, retained qualifiers and loss reporting.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "exchange-q1", "text": "Which exact S-121, geometry or provenance profile is selected for the exchange and what has actually been reviewed?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "profile identifier", "edition", "review scope", "mapping reference" ] }, { "id": "exchange-q2", "text": "Which legal qualifiers, competing claims, temporal fields or segment roles would the proposed projection lose?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "loss report", "unmapped fields", "refusal policy" ] }, { "id": "exchange-q3", "text": "What executable fixtures must pass before claiming implementation conformance or safe operational use?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "fixture suite reference", "conformance scope", "results", "unimplemented checks" ] }, { "id": "exchange-q4", "text": "Who may release a local revision after technical review, and which unresolved holds must remain visible?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "release role", "review decision", "holds", "revision identifier" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "exchange-data-1", "name": "Mapping profile", "description": "Pinned external vocabulary and proposed field bindings; absent binding is unresolved.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "exchange-data-2", "name": "Loss and conformance report", "description": "Explicit mapping losses and tested or untested status by feature.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "exchange-data-3", "name": "Release review", "description": "Local reviewer, version, hold list and decision; it grants no legal authority.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-exchange", "name": "Exchange review report", "description": "Versioned evidence for versioned external mappings. Preserve source locator, issuer and qualifications; a local record is not an official legal act.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or dataset reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier with issuer namespace first; governed global IRI second; adopting Dimension UUID or ULID third. Revision and digest are separate from identity; dates never identify the artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "function-register", "name": "Register an attributed zone record", "description": "Proposed local operation; unimplemented. Create local identity and basis assertions without proclaiming a maritime entitlement.", "inputs": [ "Issuer-qualified identity", "Class and domain", "Basis and assertion context" ], "outputs": [ "Versioned local zone record", "Refusal with missing inputs, authority or consistency reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Role and purpose authorized by the adopting Dimension", "Expected current revision and evidence access verified", "Resolve duplicate identities and distinguish rival assertions" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a local record and provenance entry; no external claim or notice" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "function-bind-extent", "name": "Bind a limit representation", "description": "Proposed local operation; unimplemented. Attach a source or derived extent without overwriting original coordinates.", "inputs": [ "Source chart or coordinate list revision", "Segment roles", "CRS and transformation description" ], "outputs": [ "Bound geometry revision with quality status", "Refusal with missing inputs, authority or consistency reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Role and purpose authorized by the adopting Dimension", "Expected current revision and evidence access verified", "Unknown or inconsistent datum prevents usable geometry status", "Review source rights and preservation of legal qualifications" ], "effects": [ "Appends depiction and derivation references; does not alter official limits" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "function-record-regime", "name": "Record a qualified regime link", "description": "Proposed local operation; unimplemented. Associate rights, passage or special-area evidence with local scope.", "inputs": [ "Instrument reference", "Domain and activity", "Effective interval", "Qualifications" ], "outputs": [ "Regime assertion revision", "Refusal with missing inputs, authority or consistency reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Role and purpose authorized by the adopting Dimension", "Expected current revision and evidence access verified", "Keep claimant, custodian and legal authority roles distinct" ], "effects": [ "Records a policy-level assertion only; does not license, permit, enforce or direct action" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "function-relate-claims", "name": "Link competing claims and arrangements", "description": "Proposed local operation; unimplemented. Record a candidate overlap or referenced settlement with attribution.", "inputs": [ "Separate claim identities", "Segment references", "Evidence of arrangement or objection" ], "outputs": [ "Qualified relation record", "Refusal with missing inputs, authority or consistency reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Role and purpose authorized by the adopting Dimension", "Expected current revision and evidence access verified", "No preference may be inferred from source order or publication venue" ], "effects": [ "Preserves alternatives and review status without resolving a dispute" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "function-diagnose-position", "name": "Diagnose a spatial relation", "description": "Proposed local operation; unimplemented. Evaluate selected depictions only under a separately implemented and tested spatial binding.", "inputs": [ "Position and CRS", "Domain and time", "Candidate geometry revisions", "Algorithm and uncertainty policy" ], "outputs": [ "Relation diagnostic with all candidate matches and limitations", "Refusal with missing inputs, authority or consistency reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Role and purpose authorized by the adopting Dimension", "Expected current revision and evidence access verified", "Refuse operational use until binding and adversarial fixtures are validated", "Missing CRS, incomplete limits or uncertain boundary requires refusal or indeterminate result" ], "effects": [ "Read-only computation; no permission, legal validity, navigation or enforcement decision" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "function-prepare-exchange", "name": "Prepare a reviewed exchange revision", "description": "Proposed local operation; unimplemented. Assemble a proposed projection with explicit mapping losses.", "inputs": [ "Local revision", "Pinned mapping profile", "Release role", "Hold list" ], "outputs": [ "Exchange candidate and loss report", "Refusal with missing inputs, authority or consistency reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Role and purpose authorized by the adopting Dimension", "Expected current revision and evidence access verified", "Refuse silent loss of claim attribution, legal qualifications or time semantics" ], "effects": [ "Writes only a local candidate artifact and review record; no remote publication or conformance certification" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-POL-015 Jurisdiction", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate reference for separately mastered authority scope. This model binds a zone, domain and cited regime assertion; it does not evaluate competence or enforce rules. Proposed binding only; target version must be resolved before use.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-PLC-008 Airspace", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Airspace volume and operations remain separate. Maritime assertions may reference associated airspace effects; excluding its master does not deny those legal relationships. Proposed binding only; target version must be resolved before use.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001" ] }, { "target": "WM-EAR-010 Ocean / Marine State", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Measurements may support baseline or shelf evidence, but physical ocean state and observation lifecycle are externally mastered. Proposed binding only; target version must be resolved before use.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "Legal instrument and geographic feature masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Store versioned references and local applicability rather than copying legal enactment, survey, island or installation lifecycles. Proposed binding only; target version must be resolved before use.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "IHO S-121 Edition 1.0.0", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate maritime exchange mapping; official register marks this edition for implementation/testing only. Product catalogue mapping and fixtures are deferred.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "OGC GeoSPARQL 1.1", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate feature, geometry, CRS and topology representation. It supplies no legal recognition, maritime entitlement or operational permission.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "W3C PROV-O 2013-04-30", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate attribution and revision lineage; no truth or legal-validity inference.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Owner designated by the adopting Dimension, with namespace and accountable stewardship role", "Legal and spatial review roles, applicable profile, authority evidence and permitted purposes", "Storage, interface, processes and retention/access bindings with pinned versions and unresolved holds" ], "namespace_guidance": "Use an adopting-Dimension namespace with issuer-qualified master identifiers. Keep local ownership distinct from state claims, legal jurisdiction and source publishing organizations.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-plc-007", "Candidate WM-POL-015, WM-PLC-008 and WM-EAR-010 bindings require reviewed target revisions" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Preserve source coordinates and legal wording references; store transformed geometry as a derived revision", "Never collapse claims by geometric equality or use a deposit as proof of recognition", "Keep vertical domain, legal time, record time and source time distinct" ], "patch_rules": [ "Require expected revision, author role, evidence and change reason; geometry and legal-effect changes require separate reviews", "Retain competing versions and expose corrected assertions; no silent overwrite of official sources" ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Class, domain, CRS, interpolation, legal qualification or time-semantics changes require mapping review", "No lossy exchange may be represented as semantically equivalent; published research remains noncanonical while holds are open" ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier qualified by issuer namespace", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension" ], "timestamp_rule": "Instant timestamps use RFC 3339 with seconds and an explicit offset or Z. Separate event time from observation and ingestion time. Preserve date-only legal sources and uncertain intervals without fabricating seconds precision.", "serial_naming_rule": "Stable artifact identity plus a separate revision token. Date strings may be metadata but never the sole identity. Keep chart edition and original source names as metadata.", "integrity_rule": "Hash retained bytes, record media type, source locator and derivation. A digest verifies byte continuity, not authenticity, legal correctness or current applicability." }, "policies": [ "Source organizations are evidence publishers, not default model owners. Only role-based ownership applies.", "Unresolved claims require visible attribution and neutral depiction; missing recognition evidence remains unknown.", "Keep enforcement, detention and controlled subjects at policy level; no operational instructions or automatic action.", "This package is not for navigation clearance, legal authorization or automated national-boundary alteration.", "Apply jurisdiction-specific rights, licensing, privacy and retention review to source documents and local records; source citation does not grant reuse rights." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Read a purpose-filtered view with as-of revision, provenance and hold indicators; never hide dispute qualifiers" ], "create": [ "Create a local record only after identity, role and source-basis checks; unknown evidence is explicit" ], "update": [ "Use optimistic revision checks and append reasoned patches; legal and spatial approvals are separate" ], "delete": [ "Retire obsolete local representations under the adopting Dimension retention policy, retaining lawful minimum tombstones and successor links", "Erase restricted payloads when policy requires and no hold applies; the external records system executes disposition. Local deletion cannot terminate a legal zone or erase referenced official records." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Dimension owner", "responsibilities": [ "Approve local scope, namespace, access and retention bindings without asserting state sovereignty" ] }, { "name": "Maritime legal reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Review regime applicability, instruments and claim qualifications; refer unresolved interpretation" ] }, { "name": "Geospatial reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Review CRS, segment roles, geometry derivations and uncertainty without adjudicating rights" ] }, { "name": "Evidence steward", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain source locators, version history, licenses and verification holds" ] }, { "name": "Consumer agent", "responsibilities": [ "Respect purpose, attribution and unknown states; refuse unsupported legal or operational conclusions" ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Least-privilege editing and purpose-scoped reading. Public source status does not make every local annotation or attachment public.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Reviewed public depictions may be released with claim attribution and limitations", "Restrict sensitive legal correspondence and source payloads by policy while preserving safe explanatory metadata" ], "audit_requirements": [ "Record actor role, purpose, revision, before/after digests and evidence references through the external audit service", "Log exceptional access, loss acceptance and review decisions without reproducing unnecessary personal data" ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "AGENTS.md and current holds", "Specification and model boundary", "Owner and Dimension policies", "Evidence, relevant findings, pinned external masters and proposed operation preconditions" ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed Maritime Zone entity with attributed legal assertions, versioned limits and qualified local operations. A separate frozen Codex no-tools self-audit found no critical model conflicts. This is a noncanonical reviewable draft with source, profile, conformance and independent-review holds, not an operational boundary or permission engine.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Persistent identity and separately attributed depictions; namespace and version are distinct." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local revision, correction and retirement do not enact or abolish a legal zone." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Neighbor boundaries, domain links, competing claims and provisional arrangements remain references." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Legal effective time, observation, publication and ingestion are distinguished." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Source locator, issuer, attribution and derivation; neither digest nor deposit proves validity." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local owner, claimant, competent authority and data custodian are separate roles." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Research structure validated separately; runtime instance schemas, geometry implementation and adversarial fixtures remain unimplemented." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Purpose, role and artifact controls with qualified public views." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Policy-controlled local retirement and lawful payload erasure; external official masters remain separate." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual S-121, GeoSPARQL and PROV-O alignments; product archive mapping and conformance tests deferred." }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Domain, limits, stated or derived breadth/area, units, method, accuracy and unknown geometry." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Evidence of recognition is attributed; coastal observations do not automatically change legal extent." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and hazards", "status": "covered", "notes": "Proposed diagnostic and exchange functions refuse unsupported inputs; no operational authorization." }, { "dimension": "beyond national jurisdiction", "status": "gap", "notes": "High seas and Area are neighboring regimes, not a residual polygon created by subtracting an incomplete national dataset." }, { "dimension": "regional applicability", "status": "gap", "notes": "UNCLOS conceptual basis and selected national example do not establish current law, universality or treaty-party status." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Current national claims, objections, instruments, treaty-party positions and licenses have not been exhaustively verified", "Coastline-change and sea-level-rise legal treatment, historic rights, straits exceptions and detailed shelf science require specialist profiles", "Detailed high-seas, Area, fisheries, conservation, protected-area and safety-zone regimes are reference-only extensions", "S-121 product archive, nested instance schemas, pinned neighbor versions and executable spatial/mapping fixtures remain unreviewed", "Direct HTTP checks were not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox restriction; two official collection pages were only available as indexed excerpts" ], "conflicts": [], "regional_assumptions": [ "UNCLOS is the conceptual legal source, not a determination of applicability to every state or dispute", "National charting examples illustrate data practice only; no coastline movement rule or statutory EEZ definition is generalized" ], "adversarial_checks": [ "Do not infer sovereignty from an EEZ or water-column jurisdiction from shelf geometry", "Do not infer recognition from deposit, map publication, ingestion or absent objection evidence", "Do not turn a maximum distance or a simple buffer into an established interstate boundary", "Do not force overlapping rival claims into one polygon or assign a single status to every segment", "Do not create operational permissions from inside/outside results, especially near uncertain boundaries", "Do not invent exact timestamps for date-only law or confuse revision with legal change", "Do not treat an artificial installation as a naturally entitled island or infer feature eligibility from visual appearance", "Do not auto-update legal limits from coastal erosion or infer high seas/Area from missing national data" ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "entity", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "Persistent zone identity is distinct from a chart, instrument, assertion or geometry revision. Evidence records do not require aggregate classification of the subject. The registry standalone-mm value is a registry-plane classification, and the row has no legacy alias or binding relation edges." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Zone identity and assertion context", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "The draft preserves stable subject identity with versioned and attributed representations; rival claims are not merged by matching geometry, class or state name." }, { "concept": "Constitutive instrument and claimant requirement", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "A basis assertion can describe inherent entitlement, uncertainty or another legal basis without inventing a proclamation. Neutral descriptive records do not require a national claimant." }, { "concept": "Authority and neighbor ownership", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Local owner, claimant, source custodian and competent authority are distinct roles. Candidate neighbor references retain jurisdiction, airspace and observation master ownership; no mandatory relation-ledger edge exists." }, { "concept": "Baseline and changing coast", "disposition": "accepted with profile hold", "rationale": "Baseline provenance, feature eligibility and source revisions are retained, while the legal effect of coastal change is referred to a reviewed profile rather than an automatic geometry update." }, { "concept": "Legal extent and geometry", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Source coordinates, derived geometry, limit segments and artificial closures remain distinct. Missing or incomplete geometry does not deny a zone, and no simple buffer establishes a boundary." }, { "concept": "Rights and vertical domains", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "The draft preserves sovereignty, sovereign rights and limited jurisdiction as qualified assertions. Shelf, waters and associated airspace regimes are not collapsed by equal horizontal footprints." }, { "concept": "Passage, overlays and broader ocean regimes", "disposition": "bounded and deferred", "rationale": "Passage and designation references are supported, but detailed fisheries, conservation, safety and beyond-national-jurisdiction profiles are explicit gaps. The model cannot infer high seas or the Area from missing data." }, { "concept": "Delimitation and provisional arrangements", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Boundary status attaches to segments and domains with instrument and time qualifications; provisional and unresolved portions are not mislabeled as final settlement." }, { "concept": "Recognition and competing claims", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Publication, deposit and silence do not become validity or recognition evidence. Parallel assertions and actual documented objections remain visible without selecting a winner." }, { "concept": "Temporal continuity", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Legal effect, observation, publication and ingestion times remain distinct. Date-only source precision is preserved, and data corrections need not create or terminate a legal zone." }, { "concept": "Evidence retention and identity", "disposition": "accepted with policy dependency", "rationale": "Stable master identifiers, revision tokens and digests have separate roles. Lawful payload erasure and minimal tombstones are compatible with lineage; deleting local records does not alter external legal masters." }, { "concept": "Proposed local functions", "disposition": "accepted as unimplemented", "rationale": "All six functions operate on local records or qualified diagnostics. They include preconditions and refusal results, and cannot establish claims, authorize passage, execute enforcement or publish externally." }, { "concept": "Source access and external mappings", "disposition": "limited and held", "rationale": "Five documents or register pages were readable and two sources support only indexed excerpts. Treaty OCR, current applicability and direct HTTP status remain unverified; S-121 register review is not product conformance." }, { "concept": "Independent review and executable assurance", "disposition": "waived and deferred", "rationale": "This local semantic self-audit is a separate phase, not independent provider review. Candidate object fields and conceptual mappings require nested schemas, pinned bindings and meaningful runtime fixtures before operational use." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner override and existing single-provider waiver; the separate local Codex no-tools self-audit is not independent review.", "Source and version verification remains incomplete. Five sources were readable through browser retrieval and two only through official indexed excerpts. Direct HTTP checks were not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox restriction, so no response status was measured. Treaty OCR, individual deposits and current source versions require coordinator and substantive review.", "Jurisdiction-specific legal applicability, national claims, instruments, objections, feature entitlement, changing coastlines, special-area profiles, source licensing and retention require qualified review. No legal, navigation or enforcement authority is granted.", "Nested instance schemas, target revision bindings, geometry algorithms, uncertainty handling, S-121 product mappings, exchange loss handling and executable conformance fixtures remain incomplete. No operational or standards-conformance certification is claimed.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Verify source versions and selected treaty text against original pages; review current national instruments, treaty application, deposits, objections, licensing and legal profile assumptions.", "Develop pinned nested schemas and external mappings with fixtures for rival claims, partial boundaries, vertical domains, missing datum, antimeridian topology, uncertain positions, date-only law and lossy exchange.", "Restore independent external review and resolve all remaining source, legal-profile and implementation holds before any canonical or publishable-draft promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 7, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 48, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }