← Back to catalogue
Published

Election

vr.wm-pol-003 · wm-pol-003-election

Describe one called public election through its rules, participation, ballot context, count evidence, outcome assertions and review references.

World Models Society, people and institutions SOC.POL.ELC

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 12 layers · 20 findings · 60 questions

Event and legal context Identity, competence, effective rules and bounded contests.

Identity and authority

Identify the event and authority evidence.

Called event identity

One called election persists through schedule changes and result revisions. A report, polling day or process template is not the event root.

  1. Which authoritative identifier distinguishes this election from another election on the same day? identity
  2. Which office-election class and round structure apply to the called event? classification
  3. Which issued call or equivalent instrument establishes that this is an actual election rather than a test or proposal? evidence

Electoral competence

Keep authority to administer, register, count and declare separately evidenced. A local owner or account role supplies no public power.

  1. Which instrument assigns each election responsibility to the acting body? authority
  2. Who stewards the election record and who reviews a disputed authority claim? ownership
  3. What action is blocked when the competent authority or its delegation is unresolved? constraint

Scope and calendar

Bind rules, stages and electoral geography.

Applicable rules and calendar

Bind effective rules and deadlines per stage and channel. Scheduled, observed and legally effective times remain different facts.

  1. Which version of the election rules governs each stage and which source establishes its applicability? requirement
  2. Which deadline trigger, time zone and exception rule governs registration, nomination, voting and challenge windows? temporal
  3. How are postponement, cancellation, a repeat poll and a later round linked without erasing the original event? lifecycle

Contests and electoral geography

Separate the office contest from its election district and from administrative reporting areas. Boundary revisions need effective dates.

  1. Which contests belong to this election and which offices or seats do they concern? composition
  2. Which boundary version assigns areas and eligible voters to each contest? spatial
  3. How do precinct, split-precinct and reporting-area identifiers map without double counting? interoperability
Electorate and contestants Qualification and nomination records without copying person or register masters.

Electorate references

Franchise and roll context.

Franchise profile

Record the applicable qualifications and review route. Broad rights principles do not establish a universal age, residence test or exclusion rule.

  1. Which qualifications apply to this electorate on the relevant qualification date? requirement
  2. Which challenged exclusion or special entitlement requires a competent determination? exception
  3. What minimum eligibility evidence may be referenced without copying a full identity file? privacy

Election roll snapshot

Use an election-specific roll version or authorized extract reference; person identity and register maintenance retain their own masters.

  1. Which authoritative roll version and cutoff underpin the electorate used for this election? provenance
  2. How are omissions, duplicates and late corrections recorded without treating an allegation as disenfranchisement? quality
  3. Who may inspect a roll or receive an extract under the applicable publication and privacy rules? access

Contestant admission

Election-specific candidacy states.

Candidacy and list status

A person or party reference is distinct from candidacy in a particular contest. Record admission, refusal, withdrawal and replacement evidence.

  1. Which person, party or list reference is associated with each candidacy and contest? relationship
  2. Which nomination decision and requirement evidence support the current ballot admission status? process
  3. How does a withdrawal, replacement, death or successful appeal affect this specific ballot revision? exception
Campaign accountability Conditions and disclosures at policy and evidence level.

Campaign environment

Attributed conditions and rules.

Campaign conditions and access

Reference campaign-period rules and observed access conditions. Allegations and determinations remain distinct; persuasion operations are outside this model.

  1. Which campaigning period and applicable restrictions are recorded for this contest? temporal
  2. Which rules and evidence describe contestant access to public campaign facilities and media? access
  3. How are reported interference or unequal-treatment concerns attributed and linked to review? evidence

Finance oversight references

Disclosures and findings by competent reviewers.

Campaign finance disclosure

Keep election-related filing and oversight references without owning accounts, donations or sanctions. Filing is not a compliance finding.

  1. Which campaign-finance reporting and limit profile applies to each filing actor? requirement
  2. Which original and amended declarations were submitted and what evidence identifies the filed version? provenance
  3. Which oversight determination resolves a finance issue and is it still subject to appeal? decision
Ballots and participation channels Approved instruments, accessible channels and secrecy boundaries.

Ballot and channel definition

Ballot styles and availability evidence.

Ballot definition and revision

Distinguish an unmarked ballot style from an individual cast record. Mixed ballot events can reference question contests without expanding this root to a referendum-only model.

  1. Which contests, selections and instruction versions belong to this ballot style? composition
  2. Which approval evidence and change review establish that this ballot style matches its eligible electorate? validation
  3. What selection, ranking or vote-allocation constraints are specified for each contest? constraint

Authorized channels and accessibility

Represent channel availability and accommodation evidence under a selected profile. This model neither runs polling infrastructure nor recommends a universal voting technology.

  1. Which verified locations or authorized remote channels serve each eligible group? spatial
  2. Which accessibility and language arrangements allow voters to use the ballot privately? requirement
  3. Which evidence records opening, interruption, extension or closure for each voting channel? event

Secrecy and ballot accounting

Separate participation evidence from anonymous counting evidence.

Ballot secrecy boundary

Protect against voter-choice linkage, including metadata joins. Eligibility administration, protected pending-ballot handling and anonymous counting evidence require separate profiles.

  1. Which separation controls prevent eligibility identifiers from becoming keys to voter selections? security
  2. How does an authorized provisional or recallable ballot process protect choices until eligibility is resolved? exception
  3. Which release review addresses small totals, ordering metadata and identifying marks in ballot-related evidence? privacy

Ballot accounting

Track issued, received, accepted, rejected and pending quantities using explicit units and mutually understood categories. Turnout and vote totals are different measures.

  1. What quantity and unit does each ballot-accounting figure measure? measurement
  2. Which profile-specific reconciliation equation explains the relationship among the reported quantities? validation
  3. Which custody and handover references support each counted batch without identifying voter choices? provenance
Counting and outcomes Counts, allocations and declared results remain separately qualified.

Count evidence

Scoped observations with correction lineage.

Count and revision evidence

Represent scoped count observations and their superseding revisions. Completion of a count does not certify a result or establish legal validity.

  1. Which selection totals and invalid, blank or unresolved categories are reported for this count scope? measurement
  2. Is the supplied count initial, partial, complete, corrected or recounted according to its source? state
  3. Which source revision, recount authorization and supersession link explain a changed total? provenance

Allocation and declaration

Rule-dependent outcome and office handoff.

Allocation rule and outcome evidence

An adopted allocation profile connects votes to seats or advancement. Do not infer winners from a simple largest-total comparison across all electoral systems.

  1. Which adopted formula, thresholds, district magnitude and tie rules determine allocation? requirement
  2. Which inputs, rounding policy and calculation evidence support the reported allocation? validation
  3. How is a tie, unfilled seat, exhausted preference or requirement for another round represented? exception

Result declaration and office handoff

Preserve asserted report status, authority evidence and legal effect separately. Election outcome references do not directly mutate the public-office master.

  1. Which competent act establishes the declared or certified result for the affected contest? authority
  2. Which result assertions are provisional, declared, challenged, stayed, corrected or annulled? state
  3. What reference records any subsequent mandate or office accession without equating it to the tally? relationship
Review and record accountability Assessments, disputes and controlled projections over time.

Review and remedies

External assessment and decision references.

Observation and audit references

Observation findings, counting audits and local record validation answer different questions. External assessments retain their own methods and limitations.

  1. Which observer or auditor role may access which process and evidence scope? access
  2. Which method, coverage and limitations qualify an observation or audit conclusion? quality
  3. What discrepancies remain unresolved after the referenced review? evidence

Complaints, remedies and finality

Retain election effects of external dispute decisions without conducting adjudication. Expiration of a local timer is not proof of legal finality.

  1. Where can a challenge to registration, nomination, voting or results be lodged under the applicable rules? process
  2. Which issued remedy, stay or annulment affects which election record or geographic scope? decision
  3. Which evidence permits a finality assertion and what event could reopen the affected outcome? lifecycle

Release and history

Versioned public projections and lawful disposition.

Results release and interchange

Publish a scoped evidence projection with its status and version. A public report must exclude private roll and voter-choice linkage data.

  1. Which exchange profile and mapping preserve contest, area, unit and report-status meanings? interoperability
  2. Which audience may receive this results projection after the secrecy and authorization checks? access
  3. How can a recipient distinguish this release from tests and superseded reports? provenance

Record history and disposition

Preserve accountable revisions within lawful retention limits. Retiring a local record neither annuls an election nor permits deletion of externally held evidence.

  1. Which election-record category, appeal hold and retention authority govern this artifact? retention
  2. Which record supersedes a retired election projection while keeping required references resolvable? lifecycle
  3. Which personal payload may be erased or restricted after authorized disposition without retaining it in a public history? privacy

Classifiers Filled

Family
World Models
Category
Society, people and institutions
Entry kind
event
Navigation path
NAV.SOC.POL.ELC
Domain
SOC.POL.ELC
Industry
Cross-industry
Tags
electionsoc.pol.elc
Also called
A13

What it is Filled

A format-neutral context model for one called office-election event, including its rounds and contests as scoped components. It records evidence and authority references throughout the event lifecycle; it is not an election execution engine.

In scope

  • Event identity, jurisdiction profile, calendar and competent-authority references
  • Election-specific electorate, candidacy, campaign and finance-disclosure context
  • Ballot definitions, channel and accessibility context, secrecy constraints and ballot accounting
  • Scoped counts, allocation evidence, declaration, review effects and controlled release history

Out of scope

  • Person, party, office, jurisdiction and register master lifecycles
  • Vote casting infrastructure, ballot adjudication, eligibility determination, enforcement and legal certification
  • Campaign persuasion and targeting, party accounting and private-body voting
  • Referendum-only events; mixed-ballot question contests are linked components
  • Generic access-audit machinery, court case procedure and cryptographic voting implementation

Why it exists Filled

Describe one called public election through its rules, participation, ballot context, count evidence, outcome assertions and review references.

Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review

  • Unlike Process template: Election is a called occurrence, not a reusable election procedure or a report document.
  • Unlike Person and electorate register: Election references authorized roll and person masters; legacy P1 alias is rejected as an identifier binding.
  • Unlike Public Office: Outcome and office accession are separate; authority references do not execute a mandate grant.
  • Unlike Referendum and private voting: Office-election scope is frozen; co-occurring question contests may be linked, but referendum-only and private votes require separate reviewed profiles.
  • Unlike Audit and dispute cases: Election retains effects and evidence references; review methodology, litigation and access-audit execution remain external.

Note: Derived from boundary notes against neighbouring models.

What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review

Must not

  • Reference responsible custodian execution for external records; retain only minimal lawful tombstones and never erase election facts by changing local status
  • Deny ungranted access; classify public results, restricted registration references and protected ballot evidence separately.
  • A subject-access route must never reveal another voter or connect a person to selections

Only with a human decision

  • A subject-access route must never reveal another voter or connect a person to selections

May

  • Record event profile: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach the event identity, rule references and scope.
  • Link status evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record a supplied determination without deciding eligibility or candidacy.
  • Check count projection: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Check scope, category and arithmetic consistency using supplied rules; never adjudicate ballots or certify winners.
  • Link review effect: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach an audit or dispute outcome and its claimed election effects.
  • Prepare results projection: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Build a local candidate public view with explicit source status.
  • Record disposition decision: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Reference authorized retention or retirement decisions.

Note: Derived from functions, policies, CRUD and access rules; prohibitions were not authored for agents as such.

Moral aspects Derived, awaiting review

  • Privacy and release reviewer
  • Adopted law may provide roll inspection or observer access; record the exact audience, purpose and fields instead of a global privacy veto
  • Apply lawful retention and privacy limits to access logs themselves

Note: Sentences mentioning harm, privacy, consent or similar, collected from the specification.

Owners Filled

Steward

Name the accountable electoral record steward and evidence of its limited authority

Roles

Electoral record steward
Maintain identity, profiles and source qualifications without assuming every legal power
Competent electoral authority
Supply authenticated decisions within evidenced mandate and jurisdiction
Evidence reviewer
Check source authenticity, scope and competing assertions
Privacy and release reviewer
Assess roll access, ballot secrecy, small-cell disclosure and release scope
Observer or auditor
Access authorized evidence and report conclusions within method and coverage limits
Local model agent
Perform proposed local checks only within scoped authorization and escalate gaps

Links to other meta-models Filled

references

  • WM-PER-001 - Candidate and authorized electorate subject identities remain in Person. Legacy P1 is not a safe identifier mapping. Candidate binding requires a reviewed version.
  • WM-ORG-009 - Public Office owns office definition and accession lifecycle; Election retains only contest and handoff references. Version binding pending.
  • WM-POL-013 - Registry Mandate may supply registration authority evidence; no automatic inference of legal competence and no import of its governance lifecycle.
  • WM-POL-015 - Jurisdiction supplies external jurisdiction identity; electoral geography and reporting-area crosswalks remain election-specific references.
  • WM-ACT-033 - Review / Inspection / Audit may hold external assessments; election keeps only scope, conclusion and limitations. No audit execution semantics imported.
  • WM-XCT-004 - Access Audit is a candidate for access evidence only. The legacy broad audit-trail mixin cannot transfer counting-audit ownership to this narrower neighbor.

aligned

  • NIST SP 1500-100 Revision 2.0 - Conceptual alignment of election, contest, reporting unit, count and report status; executable mappings and conformance tests remain open.
  • EAC VVSG 2.0 - Selected privacy, accessibility and auditability considerations within US voting-equipment scope; no certification or blanket global adoption.

neighbor

  • Process template - Election is a called occurrence, not a reusable election procedure or a report document.
  • Person and electorate register - Election references authorized roll and person masters; legacy P1 alias is rejected as an identifier binding.
  • Public Office - Outcome and office accession are separate; authority references do not execute a mandate grant.
  • Referendum and private voting - Office-election scope is frozen; co-occurring question contests may be linked, but referendum-only and private votes require separate reviewed profiles.
  • Audit and dispute cases - Election retains effects and evidence references; review methodology, litigation and access-audit execution remain external.

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Authoritative master-system identifier
  • Governed global identifier or IRI
  • UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Record event profile: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach the event identity, rule references and scope.
  • Link status evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record a supplied determination without deciding eligibility or candidacy.
  • Check count projection: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Check scope, category and arithmetic consistency using supplied rules; never adjudicate ballots or certify winners.
  • Link review effect: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach an audit or dispute outcome and its claimed election effects.
  • Prepare results projection: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Build a local candidate public view with explicit source status.
  • Record disposition decision: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Reference authorized retention or retirement decisions.

Hazards and failure modes optional Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Standards and interfaces required Missing, in the backlog

Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.

Context of use required Filled

  • ICCPR is a rights baseline whose applicability and interpretation require qualified review.
  • Venice and ODIHR materials are regional guidance, not universally binding domestic procedures.
  • NIST and VVSG documents concern US election data or equipment; no global conformance is inferred.
  • No universal winner formula, voting channel, roll-inspection audience, deadline or retention duration is asserted.

Sources Filled

  1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 25 - United Nations human rights office
  2. Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters - Council of Europe Venice Commission
  3. Election Results Common Data Format Specification - National Institute of Standards and Technology
  4. Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Version 2.0 - U.S. Election Assistance Commission
  5. Electoral System Design: An Overview of the New International IDEA Handbook - International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance
  6. Handbook for the Observation of Campaign Finance - OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
  7. Handbook for the Observation of Election Dispute Resolution - OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights

Open questions

  • Review applicable current national rules and source versions, including public indirect elections and jurisdiction-specific pending-ballot secrecy controls.
  • Develop typed schemas and fixtures for mixed ballots, overlapping reporting areas, partial counts, ties, repeated rounds, disputed declarations, small-cell disclosure and lawful disposal.
  • Verify and pin neighbor and interchange mappings, including a separate decision on the unverified legacy EML and Popolo imports.
  • Restore independent external review and close source and profile holds before canonical promotion.
  • No current national election code, treaty applicability, reservations, translation or retention schedule has been comprehensively verified.
  • Nested instance schemas, executable allocation algorithms, lossless format mappings and adversarial conformance fixtures remain unimplemented.
  • Private-body elections, referendum-only events and cryptographic or remote voting system implementation are outside the adopted boundary; public indirect elections require a dedicated profile.
  • Detailed media regulation, political-party accounting, donor records, security operations and litigation procedure remain externally owned.
  • Legacy OASIS EML and Popolo imports are deferred: no versions or mappings were verified in this run.
  • Independent second-provider review and direct HTTP source verification remain open.

Machine files

Provenance

world-models research · reviewable-draft

Built from: models/wm-pol-003-election/spec.yaml