# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-06T16:52:07Z", "synthesisSha256": "57c8d35172c641296f226545dcda310e6dcc9f9a0f61840374e8e9fcced26285", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-POL-006", "registryId": "vr.wm-pol-006", "name": "Border / Customs / Migration", "version": "0.3.0-draft", "previousVersions": [], "entryKind": "pattern", "family": "World Models", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "SOC.POL.BRD" ], "tags": [ "border", "customs", "migration", "soc.pol.brd" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-pol-006-border-customs-migration/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-pol-006", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-pol-006", "model_id": "WM-POL-006", "name": "Border / Customs / Migration", "entry_kind": "pattern", "purpose": "Coordinate independently mastered border, customs and migration records through explicit jurisdiction profiles and constrained evidence links.", "scope_statement": "A reusable coordination pattern, instantiated as a versioned local profile and reference map. It has no universal person-goods-status aggregate root and no shared legal outcome. Only profile bindings, correlation assertions and local review state belong here. Child events, declarations, status decisions and protection cases retain their own identities, authorities and lifecycles.", "in_scope": [ "Versioned jurisdiction and authority profile, domain participation and typed links across independently mastered records", "Evidence-qualified coordination of person movements, goods formalities and migration or protection referrals", "Local reference freshness, disputed correlations, recipient-specific views, review routes and mapping validation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Creation or lifecycle control of crossing events, customs declarations, goods, persons, travel documents, visas, residence statuses or asylum cases", "Tariff calculation, biometric matching, risk scoring, entry or removal decisions, declaration filing, detention operations and controlled-item handling instructions", "Universal legal eligibility, automated enforcement, national-security intelligence, operational system deployment or current-law certification" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-POL-028 Border Crossing Event", "distinction": "Incoming candidate EXTEND edge resolves the event part of legacy A16. This pattern owns only the interface role; events retain separate identity and time. Interpret the candidate as profile specialization/alignment, not entity inheritance.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-POL-029 Migration / Residence Status", "distinction": "Incoming candidate EXTEND edge resolves the legal-status part of A16. Status validity, rights and transitions remain at the target. A crossing is neither necessary nor sufficient for a status record.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "Customs declarations, goods shipments and assessments", "distinction": "Independent masters referenced by role and version. Goods may move without a linked traveler; multiple declarations, revisions and assessments may relate to one movement.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "neighbor": "Administrative case, decision, protection and enforcement records", "distinction": "Reference competent-authority outcomes and review routes. No automatic refusal-to-enforcement handoff and no local decision of protection entitlement or legal effect.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "Legacy A16 and unreviewed card supplement", "distinction": "Reconciled as leads only. Reject unconditional self-access, boolean-only carrier checks, one-point-one-time root, one assessment per declaration, wildcard imports and inherited conformance claims.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "WCO Data Model overview", "organization": "World Customs Organization", "url": "https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/instrument-and-tools/tools/data-model.aspx", "version_or_date": "Undated overview referring to Version 4; exact release not pinned", "source_type": "first-party-doc", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 2, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "Cross-agency data definitions and message alignment; no implementation conformance inferred." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "Trade Facilitation Agreement", "organization": "World Trade Organization", "url": "https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/downloads_e/tfa_en.pdf", "version_or_date": "Agreement text; entered into force 2017; member implementation schedules not checked", "source_type": "legislation", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "Articles 4, 7, 8, 10 and 12 support review, distinct release and assessment, coordination and qualified information exchange." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "Doc 9303 - Machine Readable Travel Documents", "organization": "International Civil Aviation Organization", "url": "https://www.icao.int/publications/doc-series/doc-9303", "version_or_date": "Official parts catalogue; Part 4 eighth edition 2021 identified in official indexed listing", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 2, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "Separates common document specifications, passports, visas and security mechanisms; technical algorithms remain external." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "Access to territory and non-refoulement", "organization": "United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees", "url": "https://emergency.unhcr.org/protection/legal-framework/access-territory-and-non-refoulement", "version_or_date": "06 March 2025 per official content index; complete revision not verified", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 2, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "Protection referral and non-refoulement constraints apply independently of ordinary migration-status routing." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights at International Borders", "organization": "Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/OHCHR_Recommended_Principles_Guidelines.pdf", "version_or_date": "2014 guidance; hosting path 2021-12 is not the document edition", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 2, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "Human-rights-based border governance and privacy safeguards motivate constrained coordination." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "Regulation (EU) 2016/399 - Schengen Borders Code", "organization": "European Parliament and Council of the European Union", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/399", "version_or_date": "2016 act; index labels consolidation 2025-10-12; current text not verified", "source_type": "legislation", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "Regional example: entry conditions, exceptions, reasons and review are distinct from possession of documents or status." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - General Data Protection Regulation", "organization": "European Parliament and Council of the European Union", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679", "version_or_date": "2016 adopted text; current consolidation and application to each processing purpose unverified", "source_type": "legislation", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "Articles 2, 5, 6, 15-18, 23 and Chapter V inform scoped access, correction, retention and transfer questions where applicable." }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "Guidance on the use of Main Class Levels of the WCO Data Model", "organization": "World Customs Organization", "url": "https://wiki-datamodel.wcoomd.org/en/technical-guide/guidance-on-using-Main-Class-Levels", "version_or_date": "Undated guidance; exact version unverified", "source_type": "first-party-doc", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 2, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:43:34Z", "relevance": "GoodsShipment, Consignment and BorderTransportMeans are distinct data contexts, motivating typed links instead of a universal crossing root." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "profile", "name": "Profile and jurisdiction", "description": "Define the reusable coordination profile and its authority boundaries.", "rationale": "This is a local coordination concern; target-owned legal records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "profile-identity-layer", "name": "Profile identity and participation context", "description": "Proposed profile revisions declare which domains participate; a profile may cover goods only or people only.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "profile-identity", "name": "Profile identity and participation", "description": "Proposed profile revisions declare which domains participate; a profile may cover goods only or people only.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "profile-identity-q1", "text": "Which stable profile identity and revision distinguish this coordination arrangement?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "profile ID", "revision", "supersedes reference" ] }, { "id": "profile-identity-q2", "text": "Which person, goods and status roles participate or are explicitly inapplicable?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "domain role", "participation condition", "inapplicability reason" ] }, { "id": "profile-identity-q3", "text": "What evidence justifies linking records without assuming a common crossing or shared owner?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "typed link", "link basis", "review state" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "profile-identity-data-1", "name": "profile-reference", "description": "Stable profile master and revision.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "profile-identity-data-2", "name": "participation-map", "description": "Role bindings with optionality and reasons; nested schema pending.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "profile-identity-artifact", "name": "Profile binding record", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for profile identity and participation. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "authority-profile-layer", "name": "Jurisdiction and competence context", "description": "Record applicable territory, procedure and authority references independently for each domain; physical location does not alone settle legal competence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "authority-profile", "name": "Jurisdiction and competence", "description": "Record applicable territory, procedure and authority references independently for each domain; physical location does not alone settle legal competence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "authority-profile-q1", "text": "Which jurisdiction, customs territory and effective rule version apply to each linked role?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "territory reference", "domain", "rule version", "effective interval" ] }, { "id": "authority-profile-q2", "text": "Which mandate supports the responsible authority and any delegated coordination role?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "authority reference", "mandate", "delegation limits" ] }, { "id": "authority-profile-q3", "text": "How are conflicting profiles or uncertain applicability held for qualified review?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "conflict", "review owner", "unresolved state" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "authority-profile-data-1", "name": "jurisdiction-bindings", "description": "Per-role legal profile, territory and validity references.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "authority-profile-data-2", "name": "competence-evidence", "description": "Authority mandate and unresolved conflict note.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "authority-profile-artifact", "name": "Authority applicability note", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for jurisdiction and competence. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement", "name": "Movement and document interfaces", "description": "Keep movement observations and document evidence separate from admission authority.", "rationale": "This is a local coordination concern; target-owned legal records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "crossing-links-layer", "name": "Crossing and itinerary links context", "description": "Maintain only references to crossing events and transport context; no local reconstruction of the crossing lifecycle.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "crossing-links", "name": "Crossing and itinerary links", "description": "Maintain only references to crossing events and transport context; no local reconstruction of the crossing lifecycle.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "crossing-links-q1", "text": "Which external crossing events and transport records does this profile reference?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "master references", "role", "version", "optional linkage" ] }, { "id": "crossing-links-q2", "text": "Which event times, directions and locations are reported by those masters, and when were they observed locally?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "reported event time", "direction", "location reference", "observation time", "uncertainty" ] }, { "id": "crossing-links-q3", "text": "How are missing, duplicate or contradictory movement references represented without inferring a violation?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "missing reference", "contradiction", "review state" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "crossing-links-data-1", "name": "movement-links", "description": "External event and transport references, not locally owned events.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "crossing-links-data-2", "name": "observation-context", "description": "Proposed time and uncertainty envelope; unknown is distinct from absence.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "crossing-links-artifact", "name": "Movement correlation map", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for crossing and itinerary links. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "document-evidence-layer", "name": "Travel document evidence links context", "description": "Document form and external check assertions are evidence inputs. Neither a successful check nor a document reference is an entry permission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "document-evidence", "name": "Travel document evidence links", "description": "Document form and external check assertions are evidence inputs. Neither a successful check nor a document reference is an entry permission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "document-evidence-q1", "text": "Which issuer-scoped document reference and document profile support this check assertion?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "restricted document reference", "issuer", "profile version" ] }, { "id": "document-evidence-q2", "text": "Which external result distinguishes document authenticity, holder binding and an unresolved check?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "check reference", "assertion type", "result", "limitations" ] }, { "id": "document-evidence-q3", "text": "Which recipient may see the minimum document assertion and under which purpose?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "recipient role", "purpose", "field filter", "legal basis" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "document-evidence-data-1", "name": "document-check-reference", "description": "Restricted external evidence, with no biometric payload copied.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "document-evidence-data-2", "name": "check-assertions", "description": "Typed reported results with provenance and uncertainty.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "document-evidence-artifact", "name": "Document evidence index", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for travel document evidence links. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "customs", "name": "Customs coordination", "description": "Relate declarations, assessments, controls and goods outcomes while preserving independent authority.", "rationale": "This is a local coordination concern; target-owned legal records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "declaration-links-layer", "name": "Goods and declaration correlation context", "description": "Typed consignment, shipment and declaration links permit goods-only movement and more than one record per consignment.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "declaration-links", "name": "Goods and declaration correlation", "description": "Typed consignment, shipment and declaration links permit goods-only movement and more than one record per consignment.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "declaration-links-q1", "text": "Which goods shipment, consignment and declaration masters are correlated, and by what evidence?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "master IDs", "role types", "correlation evidence" ] }, { "id": "declaration-links-q2", "text": "Which import, export or transit profile and declaration revision are referenced?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "procedure profile", "declaration revision", "mapping version" ] }, { "id": "declaration-links-q3", "text": "How is a revised or disputed declaration link superseded without altering the lodged record?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "prior link", "replacement link", "dispute", "master revision" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "declaration-links-data-1", "name": "goods-declaration-links", "description": "Many-to-many typed references where the adopting procedure permits.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "declaration-links-data-2", "name": "procedure-binding", "description": "Pinned customs procedure and message profile.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "declaration-links-artifact", "name": "Customs correlation register", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for goods and declaration correlation. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "release-assessment-layer", "name": "Separate customs outcomes context", "description": "Release, assessment, payment and other-agency clearance are distinct reported outcomes; a pending final amount need not imply unreleased goods.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ], "findings": [ { "id": "release-assessment", "name": "Separate customs outcomes", "description": "Release, assessment, payment and other-agency clearance are distinct reported outcomes; a pending final amount need not imply unreleased goods.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ], "questions": [ { "id": "release-assessment-q1", "text": "Which authority records release and which records assessment or payment status?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "outcome kind", "authority", "master reference" ] }, { "id": "release-assessment-q2", "text": "What conditions, guarantees or pending agency outcomes qualify a reported release?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "condition reference", "guarantee reference", "pending outcome", "scope" ] }, { "id": "release-assessment-q3", "text": "Which review or post-clearance reference qualifies an earlier customs outcome?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "review reference", "reported state", "effective interval", "uncertainty" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "release-assessment-data-1", "name": "customs-outcome-links", "description": "Separate external outcomes and qualifications; no amounts calculated here.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "release-assessment-data-2", "name": "review-reference", "description": "Appeal or post-clearance record, when applicable.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "release-assessment-artifact", "name": "Customs outcome matrix", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for separate customs outcomes. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "migration", "name": "Status and protection interfaces", "description": "Keep ordinary status evidence and protection needs separately routed.", "rationale": "This is a local coordination concern; target-owned legal records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "status-links-layer", "name": "Migration and residence status references context", "description": "Versioned status evidence does not determine a crossing outcome. Pending applications and unknown status remain distinct from granted or refused status.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "status-links", "name": "Migration and residence status references", "description": "Versioned status evidence does not determine a crossing outcome. Pending applications and unknown status remain distinct from granted or refused status.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "status-links-q1", "text": "Which status or application master and issuing jurisdiction supply the reported assertion?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "status reference", "application reference", "issuer", "jurisdiction" ] }, { "id": "status-links-q2", "text": "Which validity interval and conditions were reported, and is the observation stale?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "effective interval", "conditions reference", "observed at", "freshness rule" ] }, { "id": "status-links-q3", "text": "How does the profile prevent visa possession or application submission from being interpreted as guaranteed admission?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "separate admission reference", "inference prohibition", "validation issue" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "status-links-data-1", "name": "status-evidence-links", "description": "External status and application references; no right created locally.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "status-links-data-2", "name": "freshness-assessment", "description": "Local freshness finding, not a legal eligibility determination.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "status-links-artifact", "name": "Status evidence map", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for migration and residence status references. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "protection-routing-layer", "name": "Protection safeguards and referral context", "description": "Protection needs cannot be collapsed into ordinary entry eligibility. This pattern records only restricted referral and safeguard references.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "protection-routing", "name": "Protection safeguards and referral", "description": "Protection needs cannot be collapsed into ordinary entry eligibility. This pattern records only restricted referral and safeguard references.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "protection-routing-q1", "text": "Which protection referral route remains available when ordinary documentation or status is unresolved?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "competent recipient", "route reference", "unresolved condition" ] }, { "id": "protection-routing-q2", "text": "Which policy safeguards address non-refoulement, children and other specific needs in the adopting profile?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "safeguard profile", "qualified reviewer", "gap" ] }, { "id": "protection-routing-q3", "text": "Which restrictions prevent harmful disclosure of protection assertions during inter-authority coordination?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "restricted recipient", "purpose limitation", "disclosure review" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "protection-routing-data-1", "name": "safeguard-profile", "description": "Qualified policy reference; no substantive asylum decision.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "protection-routing-data-2", "name": "restricted-referrals", "description": "Minimal referrals and receipts, excluding sensitive narratives by default.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "protection-routing-artifact", "name": "Protection referral index", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for protection safeguards and referral. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "decisions", "name": "Outcome and review coordination", "description": "Expose reasons, review routes and asynchronous handoffs without a universal clearance flag.", "rationale": "This is a local coordination concern; target-owned legal records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "decision-links-layer", "name": "Decision and remedy references context", "description": "Reasoned outcomes and remedy routes remain authority-owned. A local completed task does not establish legally effective notice or finality.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "decision-links", "name": "Decision and remedy references", "description": "Reasoned outcomes and remedy routes remain authority-owned. A local completed task does not establish legally effective notice or finality.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "decision-links-q1", "text": "Which competent decision record supplies the outcome, reasons and subject scope?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "decision reference", "authority", "scope", "reason reference" ] }, { "id": "decision-links-q2", "text": "Which applicable notice and review references identify deadlines and any suspensive effect?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "notice evidence", "review route", "deadline source", "suspension basis" ] }, { "id": "decision-links-q3", "text": "How are partial, contested or reversed decisions displayed without replacing their master history?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "qualified display state", "superseding reference", "dispute" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "decision-links-data-1", "name": "decision-references", "description": "External decision, notice and review records with purpose-specific visibility.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "decision-links-data-2", "name": "remedy-profile", "description": "Jurisdiction-specific review route, not a universal deadline engine.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "decision-links-artifact", "name": "Outcome review index", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for decision and remedy references. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "handoff-state-layer", "name": "Coordination handoff state context", "description": "Local requested, acknowledged, failed and unknown handoff states refer to evidence exchange only; no transfer of legal responsibility is inferred.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "handoff-state", "name": "Coordination handoff state", "description": "Local requested, acknowledged, failed and unknown handoff states refer to evidence exchange only; no transfer of legal responsibility is inferred.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "handoff-state-q1", "text": "Which allowed role-to-role handoff is requested and what purpose limits its content?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "sender role", "recipient role", "purpose", "field subset" ] }, { "id": "handoff-state-q2", "text": "What receipt and correlation evidence distinguish acknowledgement from substantive acceptance?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "receipt reference", "message correlation", "reported result" ] }, { "id": "handoff-state-q3", "text": "How are stale, duplicate or conflicting responses held without silently choosing an authoritative outcome?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "conflict set", "local hold", "resolution owner" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "handoff-state-data-1", "name": "handoff-links", "description": "Purpose-bound external message and receipt references.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "handoff-state-data-2", "name": "coordination-state", "description": "Proposed local review state only; vocabulary to be pinned by adoption.", "value_kind": "code", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "handoff-state-artifact", "name": "Handoff evidence ledger", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for coordination handoff state. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "information", "name": "Information governance and mappings", "description": "Constrain personal and commercial data use and expose mapping limits.", "rationale": "This is a local coordination concern; target-owned legal records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "recipient-views-layer", "name": "Recipient views and lawful retention context", "description": "Access, correction and disposition follow applicable law and role. Local owner consent alone cannot authorize every authority exchange.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "recipient-views", "name": "Recipient views and lawful retention", "description": "Access, correction and disposition follow applicable law and role. Local owner consent alone cannot authorize every authority exchange.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "recipient-views-q1", "text": "Which traveler, representative, declarant, carrier or authority view is permitted for this purpose?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "recipient role", "authority basis", "filtered fields", "restriction reason" ] }, { "id": "recipient-views-q2", "text": "What correction, restriction or contested-record route is available without hiding the dispute?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "request reference", "review route", "dispute marker" ] }, { "id": "recipient-views-q3", "text": "Which retention trigger, hold and disposal rule governs each local reference and cached payload?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "record class", "trigger", "hold basis", "disposal action", "residual-copy review" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "recipient-views-data-1", "name": "view-policy", "description": "Applicable access and transfer rules; no unconditional self-access claim.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "recipient-views-data-2", "name": "disposition-bindings", "description": "Reference and payload retention separately scoped.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "recipient-views-artifact", "name": "Access and disposition map", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for recipient views and lawful retention. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "mapping-validation-layer", "name": "Mapping and coverage validation context", "description": "Mappings are proposed alignments. Validate type, version, omissions and uncertainty before accepting a local profile; a shared message format does not harmonize legal effects.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "mapping-validation", "name": "Mapping and coverage validation", "description": "Mappings are proposed alignments. Validate type, version, omissions and uncertainty before accepting a local profile; a shared message format does not harmonize legal effects.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "mapping-validation-q1", "text": "Which pinned WCO or travel-document profile maps each typed local reference?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "external version", "mapping ID", "source field", "target role" ] }, { "id": "mapping-validation-q2", "text": "Which dropped fields, code mismatches and unresolved bindings prevent faithful interchange?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "loss report", "code system version", "unresolved binding" ] }, { "id": "mapping-validation-q3", "text": "What fixtures demonstrate goods-only, undocumented protection and conflicting-status cases without automatic legal decisions?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "fixture ID", "expected coordination result", "observed result", "reviewer" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "mapping-validation-data-1", "name": "mapping-references", "description": "Proposed mappings and version pins; no wildcard imports.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "mapping-validation-data-2", "name": "conformance-evidence", "description": "External test evidence, absent until independently implemented.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "mapping-validation-artifact", "name": "Mapping review report", "description": "Proposed local evidence index for mapping and coverage validation. Stores references and review assertions, not replacement legal records.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured reference map", "Restricted review note" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact ID first; governed IRI next; owner-assigned UUID fallback. Revision is separate; dates and personal document numbers are not artifact identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "bind-profile", "name": "Bind a local profile", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate approved jurisdiction and role bindings with a new local profile revision.", "inputs": [ "profile ID", "rule and mandate references", "participation map" ], "outputs": [ "versioned local binding or unresolved-profile report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized local role and lawful processing purpose verified", "Current profile revision and evidence scope supplied; unresolved authority causes refusal", "No pending conflicting local edit; restricted data minimized" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a versioned local coordination assertion, view or report", "No declaration lodged, permit issued, person admitted, removal executed, payment made or message sent" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "link-evidence", "name": "Link external evidence", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record a typed correlation assertion and its basis without copying master lifecycles.", "inputs": [ "external references", "role types", "correlation basis" ], "outputs": [ "local link assertion or rejected-link report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized local role and lawful processing purpose verified", "Current profile revision and evidence scope supplied; unresolved authority causes refusal", "No pending conflicting local edit; restricted data minimized" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a versioned local coordination assertion, view or report", "No declaration lodged, permit issued, person admitted, removal executed, payment made or message sent" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "review-freshness", "name": "Review reference freshness", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Compare reported times and revisions against the selected local freshness rule.", "inputs": [ "reference observations", "profile freshness rule" ], "outputs": [ "fresh, stale, conflicting or unknown local assessment" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized local role and lawful processing purpose verified", "Current profile revision and evidence scope supplied; unresolved authority causes refusal", "No pending conflicting local edit; restricted data minimized" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a versioned local coordination assertion, view or report", "No declaration lodged, permit issued, person admitted, removal executed, payment made or message sent" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "record-handoff", "name": "Record handoff evidence", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Index already authorized external exchange receipts without sending messages or delegating legal competence.", "inputs": [ "receipt reference", "purpose", "recipient role" ], "outputs": [ "local receipt index or purpose-mismatch report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized local role and lawful processing purpose verified", "Current profile revision and evidence scope supplied; unresolved authority causes refusal", "No pending conflicting local edit; restricted data minimized" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a versioned local coordination assertion, view or report", "No declaration lodged, permit issued, person admitted, removal executed, payment made or message sent" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "project-view", "name": "Prepare recipient view", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Prepare a local minimum-data view under verified role, purpose and restrictions; no external disclosure.", "inputs": [ "authorized viewer context", "policy version", "reference set" ], "outputs": [ "filtered local view or denied/unknown report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized local role and lawful processing purpose verified", "Current profile revision and evidence scope supplied; unresolved authority causes refusal", "No pending conflicting local edit; restricted data minimized" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a versioned local coordination assertion, view or report", "No declaration lodged, permit issued, person admitted, removal executed, payment made or message sent" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "validate-profile", "name": "Validate coordination profile", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Check role typing, source pins and conflicting assertions, reporting gaps without deciding legal eligibility.", "inputs": [ "profile revision", "mapping references", "validation fixtures" ], "outputs": [ "structural and semantic issue report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized local role and lawful processing purpose verified", "Current profile revision and evidence scope supplied; unresolved authority causes refusal", "No pending conflicting local edit; restricted data minimized" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a versioned local coordination assertion, view or report", "No declaration lodged, permit issued, person admitted, removal executed, payment made or message sent" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-POL-028", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Optional binding to separately mastered crossing events; incoming candidate EXTEND means profile specialization, not ownership of events.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-POL-029", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Optional binding to separately mastered migration status; incoming candidate EXTEND does not make status a property of a crossing.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "Customs declaration and consignment masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Bind declarations, goods and assessments by typed external IDs; exact registry targets require adoption review.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "target": "Administrative decision and protection case masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve decisions, remedies and protection referrals through competent authorities; local correlation has no legal effect.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "Person, authority and travel-document masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Minimize identifying payload and use separately governed master references; target versions remain to be pinned.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WCO Data Model", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Conceptual cross-border data alignment only; release-specific message mapping and conformance are deferred.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008" ] }, { "target": "ICAO Doc 9303", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Document-profile alignment only; no biometric verification or technical conformance implementation.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Accountable public-authority role and coordination mandate; no company or brand is designated owner", "Jurisdiction, applicable law and domain participation profile with effective dates", "Pinned master-reference bindings, lawful purpose and recipient policy", "Qualified steward for disputes, protection safeguards and retention" ], "namespace_guidance": "Use an adopting authority namespace for profile and link IDs. Separate role, record kind and jurisdiction; never use a passport number as a public key.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-pol-006", "WM-POL-028 and WM-POL-029 candidate specialization bindings" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Stable local profile ID plus separate immutable revision; preserve master identity and evidence qualification", "No universal cleared state across people, goods and status domains" ], "patch_rules": [ "Require expected revision, authorized role, reason and provenance; supersede correlation assertions without rewriting source decisions", "Correction and lawful erasure may remove payload; retain only legally justified minimal revision evidence" ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Changing domain optionality, legal meaning or recipient visibility is a reviewed breaking profile change", "Pin external versions; wildcard imports and inherited legacy conformance claims are rejected" ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "Owner-assigned UUID or ULID" ], "timestamp_rule": "Use RFC 3339 with seconds and an explicit offset or Z for precise timestamps. Separate event, effective and observation time; keep date-only or uncertain values at their actual precision.", "serial_naming_rule": "Use stable artifact identity plus a separate revision or sequence. Dates, names and sensitive identity numbers are not artifact keys.", "integrity_rule": "Record digest, source reference and acquisition context when lawful. A digest establishes byte continuity, not truth, authenticity, admission or permission." }, "policies": [ "Sources motivate proposed research structure; they do not prescribe this local schema. No universal legal or technical conformance is claimed.", "Human-rights and protection issues require qualified policy review. No automated adverse decision, detention procedure or controlled-item operational instruction is provided.", "No raw biometrics, full protection narratives or bulk travel history by default. Owner approval cannot replace lawful authority or necessary transfer safeguards.", "A legal hold is scoped and reviewed; revision history does not authorize permanent personal-data storage." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Authorize purpose and recipient before dereferencing external records; expose unresolved or stale evidence." ], "create": [ "Create local profile or link assertions only with mandate, provenance and revision." ], "update": [ "Check concurrency and reason; retain disputed assertions with qualified views and lawful minimal provenance." ], "delete": [ "Apply retention schedules, scoped holds and authorized payload erasure; review caches and derived views. Minimal tombstones only when lawful. Local deletion cannot annul a master decision." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Profile steward", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain local role bindings and version review." ] }, { "name": "Domain authority reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Confirm competence and meaning of target-owned outcomes." ] }, { "name": "Protection reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Review safeguard and referral policy without exposing protected narratives." ] }, { "name": "Privacy and records steward", "responsibilities": [ "Review access, correction, retention and transfer rules." ] }, { "name": "Evidence curator", "responsibilities": [ "Record source, observation and disputed correlation context." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny by default; require lawful purpose, verified role and field-level permission before following a reference.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Self-access and representation requests follow applicable rights, identity checks and lawful restrictions; refusal requires a recorded review route", "Emergency access requires its own legal basis, limited scope and retrospective review; no automatic bypass" ], "audit_requirements": [ "Log authorized access and policy version with minimal identifiers; external audit trail master remains separate", "Record disclosure purpose, recipient and restriction rationale; review small-cell re-identification risk before aggregate release" ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "AGENTS.md and local owner mandate", "spec.yaml and visible publication holds", "Applicable domain profiles, source versions and master bindings", "Recipient policy and evidence before any local operation" ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed coordination pattern for independently mastered border, customs and migration records. Legacy A16 is disaggregated through explicit reference roles rather than a shared legal lifecycle. Separate local no-tools self-audit completed; independent review, source/version verification, qualified jurisdiction profiles and executable conformance remain holds. This reviewable draft is noncanonical and makes no universal legal or completeness claim.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Versioned pattern profile and typed reference assertions; child master identities preserved." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local profile revisions and supersession; target legal lifecycles delegated." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Optional domain participation and evidence-qualified correlations." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Effective and observed times, freshness and uncertainty distinguished." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Source, authority and disputed assertions recorded." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local profile stewardship separated from each domain authority." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Research schema validatable; executable nested instance schemas and fixtures pending." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Recipient-specific lawful views with qualified self-access." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Payload erasure, scoped holds and minimal lawful tombstones." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual alignments only; pinned operational mappings missing." }, { "dimension": "physical properties", "status": "not-applicable", "notes": "The pattern is abstract; location, goods measurements and document features belong to external records." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Typed roles and evidence distinguish pattern bindings from events or statuses." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and actions", "status": "covered", "notes": "Six proposed local operations with authority and revision preconditions." }, { "dimension": "protection and regional breadth", "status": "gap", "notes": "Protection policy interfaces present; national, maritime, asylum, statelessness and specialist regimes need deeper profile review." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Independent second-provider review absent; Claude and Grok skipped under owner waiver", "Live HTTP and current-version verification pending; several sources available only as official indexed excerpts", "Country-specific visa, residence, asylum, customs debt, national-security and law-enforcement privacy regimes are not implemented", "Biometric algorithms, tariff classifications, risk selection, controlled-item procedures and detention operations excluded", "Nested instance schemas, precise target bindings, mapping fixtures and conformance testing deferred" ], "conflicts": [], "regional_assumptions": [ "WTO commitments require member-specific applicability and implementation review", "EU border and data-protection rules are regional examples; GDPR is not asserted to govern every border-processing purpose", "OHCHR guidance and UNHCR protection material are not a substitute for checking applicable instruments and jurisdiction" ], "adversarial_checks": [ "Goods-only consignment cannot require a traveler or visa", "A valid document, visa or customs release cannot automatically admit a person", "Unknown status cannot be interpreted as unlawful status or grounds for removal", "A protection referral cannot be disclosed merely because an authority requests all linked records", "Duplicate or conflicting master assertions produce a local unresolved state, not silent reconciliation", "One declaration may have multiple revisions or assessments; no legacy 1:1 cardinality retained" ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "pattern", "status": "split", "rationale": "The registry category-split-required value is a migration review classification, not a subject-kind enum. The legacy crossing and status portions are delegated to the existing WM-POL-028 and WM-POL-029 roles, and customs records remain independently mastered. WM-POL-006 retains only the reusable coordination pattern and versioned local bindings. No new child model or shared registry mutation is part of this run." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Universal border aggregate", "disposition": "rejected", "rationale": "Goods-only, pre-arrival and post-clearance cases in the frozen evidence defeat mandatory person-goods-status co-location and a single shared lifecycle. The proposed pattern preserves separate masters." }, { "concept": "Candidate incoming specialization edges", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "WM-POL-028 and WM-POL-029 retain the event and status semantics described by the frozen relation ledger. Incoming candidate EXTEND is interpreted as pattern specialization/alignment, not ratified entity inheritance; reverse local references do not transfer ownership." }, { "concept": "Profile identity and competence", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Stable profile identity, revision and jurisdiction-qualified role bindings form a coherent pattern instantiation. A location or shared operator does not itself establish legal competence for every linked domain." }, { "concept": "Document checks and admission", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Document profile, check result, holder binding and admission are separate evidence roles. The ICAO catalogue supports alignment discovery only; the result does not assert biometric or document-authentication implementation." }, { "concept": "Customs assessment cardinality and release", "disposition": "legacy assumptions rejected", "rationale": "The frozen WTO material distinguishes goods release from final assessment and allows later review. The result uses independently qualified outcomes and multiple references, not the legacy fixed one-assessment relation or universal clearance flag." }, { "concept": "Migration-status and protection routing", "disposition": "accepted with qualification", "rationale": "Unknown status and pending applications cannot become unlawful status or adverse decisions locally. Protection referral is separately constrained. The questions solicit qualified safeguards; they do not claim a complete asylum or child-protection procedure." }, { "concept": "Decision, notice and legal effect", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Local handoff acknowledgement and completed review state are consistently limited to coordination. Decision reasons, notification, deadlines, suspensive effects and finality remain external, jurisdiction-specific assertions." }, { "concept": "Local functions and authority", "disposition": "accepted as proposed only", "rationale": "All six functions operate on local bindings, references, views or reports with role, purpose and revision preconditions. None sends a message, files a declaration, calculates liability, grants a right or executes enforcement." }, { "concept": "Self-access and carrier disclosure", "disposition": "legacy guarantees rejected", "rationale": "Recipient views require applicable legal basis, identity, purpose and restrictions. Neither unconditional self-access nor a boolean-only carrier result is inherited. Unknown and restricted answers remain possible without owner consent substituting for lawful authority." }, { "concept": "Retention, corrections and artifact identity", "disposition": "accepted with adoption dependency", "rationale": "Master-first artifact identity and separate revisions are coherent. History is limited by lawful payload erasure, scoped holds and minimal justified tombstones; local deletion does not revoke or annul source decisions." }, { "concept": "Source scope and verification", "disposition": "limited", "rationale": "Four substantive pages or documents and four official indexed sources are distinguished. Browser challenges and incomplete text retrieval prevent a full-source or current-law claim. Direct HTTP was not attempted under the owner-reported block, so no response status was measured." }, { "concept": "Instance validation and mapping conformance", "disposition": "deferred", "rationale": "Optional candidate data groups and conceptual alignments are research design, not executable nested schemas. Exact neighbor versions, code mappings, fixtures and operational acceptance remain incomplete and visible as holds." }, { "concept": "Independent external review", "disposition": "waived and held", "rationale": "The assessment is a separate local Codex self-audit of frozen evidence. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the explicit owner override. No independent-provider agreement or canonical assurance is claimed." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent under the owner-authorized single-provider waiver. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts. This separate local Codex no-tools self-audit is not a second-provider review.", "Live source and version verification is incomplete. Direct HTTP checks were not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox block; zero HTTP 200 responses were measured. Four sources were reviewed only as official indexed excerpts. Current legal consolidations, full technical parts and exact guidance versions require coordinator and qualified source review.", "Jurisdiction-specific customs, migration, protection, access, transfer, notice, review and retention rules require qualified adoption review. International guidance and selected EU examples do not establish universal legal applicability or an operational compliance engine.", "Nested instance schemas, exact neighbor bindings, candidate specialization semantics, version-pinned external mappings and adversarial conformance fixtures remain unimplemented. Legacy conformance labels and wildcard imports are not admitted.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Obtain complete texts and verify effective legal and technical versions, member implementation schedules, licensing and jurisdiction applicability for every adopted profile.", "Develop pinned schemas and mappings with goods-only, multiple-assessment, stale-status, conflicting-movement, protection-referral and lawful-erasure fixtures.", "Restore independent external review and confirm the candidate pattern-specialization bindings before any canonical or operational promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 8, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 36, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }