← Back to catalogue
Published

Public Authority / Institution

vr.wm-pol-016 · wm-pol-016-public-authority-institution

Describe a public institution and its source-qualified legal competence, institutional structure and accountability context.

World Models Society, people and institutions SOC.POL.AUT

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 12 layers · 12 findings · 36 questions

Institutional identity Public institution institutional identity.

Identity and recognition

Authored institutional-record design for identity and recognition. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Identity and recognition record

Authored institutional-record design for identity and recognition. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which authoritative institution identifier and official names identify this body across languages and name changes? identity
  2. What evidence distinguishes this institution from similarly named offices, buildings or websites? evidence
  3. Which asserted legal-personality status and public-body classification apply under which dated jurisdictional definition? classification

Institutional scope and boundaries

Authored institutional-record design for institutional scope and boundaries. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Institutional scope and boundaries record

Authored institutional-record design for institutional scope and boundaries. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which governmental level, parent relationships and separate institutional units are evidenced? relationship
  2. Which administrative and statistical classifications describe the institution without determining its powers? classification
  3. Which apparent duplicates or predecessor records require unresolved identity decisions rather than automatic merges? quality
Foundation and competence Public institution foundation and competence.

Establishment and legal basis

Authored institutional-record design for establishment and legal basis. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Establishment and legal basis record

Authored institutional-record design for establishment and legal basis. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which legislation, charter or other authorized framework established this institution and when did it take effect? provenance
  2. Which instrument provisions define its purpose, duties and limitations, including uncertain interpretations? authority
  3. Which amendments, repeals or contested sources alter the asserted institutional basis over time? lifecycle

Competence jurisdiction and delegation

Authored institutional-record design for competence jurisdiction and delegation. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Competence jurisdiction and delegation record

Authored institutional-record design for competence jurisdiction and delegation. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which subject-matter, territorial, personal and temporal limits qualify each asserted competence? constraint
  2. Which delegated powers name a delegator, recipient, legal basis and limits without confusing delegation with reporting? authority
  3. What evidence or authorized interpretation is still missing before relying on the institution's power in a concrete matter? evidence
Governance and institutional relationships Public institution governance and institutional relationships.

Organs posts and representation

Authored institutional-record design for organs posts and representation. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Organs posts and representation record

Authored institutional-record design for organs posts and representation. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which governing organs, organizational units and posts belong to this institution during the relevant period? composition
  2. Which appointment or representation references distinguish a post from its current holder and authorized actions? relationship
  3. Which vacancies, acting appointments or competing claims require explicit uncertainty instead of inferred representation? exception

Oversight and resources

Authored institutional-record design for oversight and resources. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Oversight and resources record

Authored institutional-record design for oversight and resources. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which bodies supervise, sponsor, audit or receive reports from this institution under distinct mandates? relationship
  2. Which budget, funding and resource masters are referenced without equating financing with legal control? ownership
  3. Which independence guarantees and control assessments coexist under their respective definitions? classification
Functions services and public interface Public institution functions services and public interface.

Functions and delivery responsibility

Authored institutional-record design for functions and delivery responsibility. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Functions and delivery responsibility record

Authored institutional-record design for functions and delivery responsibility. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which public functions and service references are attributed to the institution by authoritative sources? definition
  2. Which services are delivered directly or by another provider while responsibility remains separately recorded? authority
  3. Which service status, eligibility or output details belong to referenced service models rather than institution identity? composition

Locations and contact channels

Authored institutional-record design for locations and contact channels. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Locations and contact channels record

Authored institutional-record design for locations and contact channels. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which official sites, contact points and accessible channels are associated with the institution? spatial
  2. Which service territory or jurisdiction differs from office location or correspondence address? spatial
  3. How are contact authenticity, availability and publication permission checked without initiating contact? validation
Accountability and information custody Public institution accountability and information custody.

Decisions reports and transparency

Authored institutional-record design for decisions reports and transparency. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Decisions reports and transparency record

Authored institutional-record design for decisions reports and transparency. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which decision registers, reports, publication schemes and oversight records are authoritative references? evidence
  2. What information is proactively publishable under which policy, with what exclusions and review dates? access
  3. Which complaint or review routes are available without assuming that every institution uses the same procedure? process

Provenance correction and custody

Authored institutional-record design for provenance correction and custody. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Provenance correction and custody record

Authored institutional-record design for provenance correction and custody. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which source, steward and effective time support each material institutional assertion? provenance
  2. How are conflicting mandate or identity claims corrected without overwriting source history? quality
  3. Which access, retention, legal-hold and custody policies govern institutional evidence and retirement of local copies? retention
Institutional change and interoperability Public institution institutional change and interoperability.

Reorganization and succession

Authored institutional-record design for reorganization and succession. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Reorganization and succession record

Authored institutional-record design for reorganization and succession. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which establishment, merger, split, transfer or abolition event changed the institution's identity or responsibilities? event
  2. Which instrument and effective dates link predecessor and successor institutions without treating renaming as automatic replacement? temporal
  3. Where do unresolved obligations, service responsibilities and records custody pass according to explicit evidence? relationship

Mapping and acceptance

Authored institutional-record design for mapping and acceptance. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

Mapping and acceptance record

Authored institutional-record design for mapping and acceptance. Selected sources motivate distinctions; legal interpretations and operational enforcement require separate profiles.

  1. Which pinned organization or service vocabulary maps the institutional record and with what semantic limits? interoperability
  2. Which lost authority, time, identity or disclosure qualifiers make a projection unacceptable? constraint
  3. Which executable tests and legal-profile reviews remain necessary before operational reliance? validation

Classifiers Filled

Family
World Models
Category
Society, people and institutions
Entry kind
entity
Navigation path
NAV.SOC.POL.AUT
Domain
SOC.POL.AUT
Industry
Cross-industry
Tags
publicauthorityinstitutionsoc.pol.aut

What it is Filled

One public institution, potentially lacking separate legal personality, with evidenced identity, basis, competence, relationships and institutional changes. Classification is not proof of powers.

In scope

  • Institution identity, classifications, legal basis and bounded competence assertions
  • Organs, oversight, service responsibility and public contact references
  • Transparency, evidence custody, succession and loss-aware mappings

Out of scope

  • A sovereign state, individual officeholder, building or full service catalogue
  • Legal advice, automatic power inference, policy enforcement or government decision execution
  • Private personnel, case files and complete financial or statutory instrument masters

Why it exists Filled

Describe a public institution and its source-qualified legal competence, institutional structure and accountability context.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • A public institution, which may lack separate legal personality, not the state as a whole.
  • Differs from an officeholder: the institution persists when people change.
  • Differs from a public service, which the institution provides or oversees.
  • Its competence comes from a legal basis, not from its name or classification.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Infer legal powers from a website, name or funding.
  • Present the agent as acting for the institution.
  • Give legal advice about the institution's decisions.
  • Fabricate missing legal basis or competence.
  • Treat publicly available data as free to redistribute without checking terms.

Only with a human decision

  • Asserting disputed competence.
  • Publishing official institutional data.

May

  • Resolve an institution and its legal basis.
  • Link services to responsible institutions.
  • Record institutional changes such as mergers with evidence.
  • Direct people to official contact points.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Citizens rely on accurate institutional data to exercise rights and meet obligations.
  • Impersonating public institutions can defraud people.
  • Transparency and accountability of public bodies should be supported, not obscured.

Who is affected

  • Citizens and residents
  • Public officials and staff
  • Oversight bodies and journalists

Owners Filled

Steward

Declare institution-record steward distinct from the institution and its legal authorities.

Roles

Dimension owner
Delegates local memory scope, not government powers.
Institution steward
Maintains attributed identity and mandate references.
Contributor
Supplies authorized source references and uncertainty.
Reviewer
Checks boundary, profile and interpretation limits.
Custodian
Enforces access, disclosure and retention policies.

Links to other meta-models Filled

aligned

  • WM-ORG-001 - Candidate general organization alignment, not ratified inheritance.
  • https://semiceu.github.io/CPOV/releases/2.1.1/ - Institution fields with sector-specific limits.
  • https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ - Posts, sites and changes, without legal-power entailment.
  • https://semiceu.github.io/CPSV-AP/releases/3.2.0/ - Referenced service responsibility, not a full service model.

neighbor

  • Organization - Public institutional specialization is conceptual; registry parent WM-ORG-001 is not a ratified inherited schema.
  • Public service - Responsible institution and delivery provider differ; service details stay referenced.
  • Post and officeholder - Institution persists through vacancies; a post and its current holder have distinct records.
  • Statistical sector - Statistical public control does not decide independence or legal competence.
  • Site - Address or office presence is not institutional identity or jurisdiction.

parent

  • WM-ORG-001

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Master-system qualified institution identifier
  • Governed global institution URI
  • Dimension-issued UUID

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • A public institution has an official name, a legal basis, a parent government level and official identifiers.
  • Confused with private contractors delivering services, officeholders, buildings and websites.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Resolve institution reference: Proposed local record operation: resolve institution reference. Execution adapter is not implemented.
  • Record institutional basis: Proposed local record operation: record institutional basis. Execution adapter is not implemented.
  • Link service responsibility: Proposed local record operation: link service responsibility. Execution adapter is not implemented.
  • Record institutional change: Proposed local record operation: record institutional change. Execution adapter is not implemented.
  • Record publication scope: Proposed local record operation: record publication scope. Execution adapter is not implemented.
  • Export allowed projection: Proposed local record operation: export allowed projection. Execution adapter is not implemented.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • People directed to wrong or defunct authorities.
  • Impersonation scams using institutional identity.
  • Decisions based on assumed powers.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • EU Core Public Organisation Vocabulary.
  • Core Public Service Vocabulary Application Profile.
  • W3C Organization Ontology.
  • UN Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG).
  • ISO 3166 country and subdivision codes.

Context of use required Filled

  • UK administrative/statistical/FOI examples are bounded and do not define all public institutions worldwide.

Sources Filled

  1. Core Public Organisation Vocabulary - European Union SEMIC
  2. The Organization Ontology - W3C
  3. Core Public Service Vocabulary Application Profile - European Union SEMIC
  4. Public bodies - UK Cabinet Office
  5. Statistical classification to the public sector - Office for National Statistics
  6. Publication schemes: a guide - Information Commissioner Office

Open questions

  • Independent review and exact source/license/profile verification.
  • Concrete legal instruments and bounded competence/succession mappings.
  • Executable nested fields, negative tests and ratified composition.
  • Both providers timed out once; no independent external review.
  • Selected clauses only; full dated-pin/update/license and jurisdiction-profile verification pending.
  • No concrete institution-specific legal instrument or universal competence interpretation supplied.
  • No executable nested schemas, legal inference engine, succession/custody transfer or round-trip adapter.
  • Empty relation ledger; proposed composition has not been ratified.

Machine files

Provenance

world-models research · reviewable-draft

Built from: models/wm-pol-016-public-authority-institution/spec.yaml, ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-pol-016-public-authority-institution.json