# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-06T12:13:40Z", "synthesisSha256": "3f9d00c1521ed618f1381e12493dabcc8a830ce08f7916a7675d2f5c36192309", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-POL-027", "registryId": "vr.wm-pol-027", "name": "Property Right / Tenure", "version": "0.1.0", "previousVersions": [], "entryKind": "relationship", "family": "World Models", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "SOC.POL.PRP" ], "tags": [ "property", "right", "tenure", "soc.pol.prp" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-pol-027-property-right-tenure/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-pol-027", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-pol-027", "model_id": "WM-POL-027", "name": "Property Right / Tenure", "entry_kind": "relationship", "purpose": "Represent an evidenced or asserted tenure interest linking parties to a separately mastered resource, with qualified scope, status and legal or customary basis.", "scope_statement": "One identifiable property-right or tenure relationship, including a disputed or unregistered claim, with a versioned assertion history. The source-grounded core covers land and associated resource tenure. It records what is asserted, recognized or contested without deciding entitlement. General movable-asset and intellectual-property profiles are deferred.", "in_scope": [ "Interest identity, classification, holder or claimant roles and resource references", "Legal or customary basis, spatial and temporal scope, registration evidence and competing assertions", "Restrictions, responsibilities, change evidence, dispute references and controlled projections" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Parcel geometry, asset, person, community, contract, instrument, loan and court-case master lifecycles", "Determining title, legal priority or boundary disputes; conveyancing, register mutation, enforcement, eviction or expropriation execution", "Universal registration rules, valuation and taxation engines, general intellectual-property or movable-asset coverage" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-PLC-002 Land Parcel", "distinction": "Registry parent is a candidate navigation relationship, not semantic inheritance. The interest references one or more resource extents; it neither is a parcel nor owns survey and parcel lifecycle.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "Party and community masters", "distinction": "Store role, share semantics and mandate references, not party or community identity administration. A claimant, custodian and legal holder are distinct roles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "neighbor": "Contracts, instruments and register entries", "distinction": "Reference instruments and entries as evidence. One document may support several interests, and one interest may have several sources; entry identity is not automatically right identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "neighbor": "Dispute case, decision and enforcement", "distinction": "Carry scoped case and outcome references only. Adjudication and enforcement remain outside this model; contested status does not settle a claim.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests", "organization": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations", "url": "https://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2801e/i2801e.pdf", "version_or_date": "Endorsed 2012; first revision May 2022 as displayed in retrieved PDF", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T12:12:35Z", "relevance": "Sections 3, 9, 10, 11, 16, 17 and 21: legitimate tenure, inclusive records and safeguards. Voluntary guidance, not universal property law." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "ISO 19152-1:2024 Geographic information - Land Administration Domain Model - Part 1: Generic conceptual model", "organization": "International Organization for Standardization", "url": "https://www.iso.org/standard/81263.html", "version_or_date": "Edition 1, January 2024; public abstract only", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T12:12:35Z", "relevance": "Public abstract distinguishes parties, administrative units, RRRs, spatial units, sources and versions. Licensed clauses and conformance not reviewed." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "INSPIRE Data Specification on Cadastral Parcels - Technical Guidelines", "organization": "European Commission Joint Research Centre", "url": "https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/document/download/4a23f598-a7a9-4d93-868b-040e7ee91677_en", "version_or_date": "2024-07-31, as displayed on PDF cover", "source_type": "schema", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T12:12:35Z", "relevance": "Executive summary and scope separate geometric parcel information from nationally governed ownership and rights; selected identifier and temporal attributes." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "Practice guide 19: notices, restrictions and the protection of third-party interests in the register", "organization": "HM Land Registry", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notices-restrictions-and-protection-of-third-party-interests-pg19/practice-guide-19-notices-restrictions-and-the-protection-of-third-party-interests-in-the-register", "version_or_date": "Updated 27 July 2026 as displayed; England and Wales", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T12:12:35Z", "relevance": "Sections 1 to 3 distinguish interest, notice, restriction and priority; notice does not guarantee validity. Selected passages, not full legal review." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "Practice guide 25: leases - when to register", "organization": "HM Land Registry", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leases-when-to-register-pg25/practice-guide-25-leases-when-to-register", "version_or_date": "Updated 1 June 2026 as displayed; England and Wales", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T12:12:35Z", "relevance": "Sections 1 and 2 illustrate lease interests, term, transfers and varied registration conditions; no numerical rule generalized." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "HM Land Registry plans: boundaries (practice guide 40, supplement 3)", "organization": "HM Land Registry", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hm-land-registry-plans-boundaries-pg40s3/land-registry-plans-boundaries-practice-guide-40-supplement-3", "version_or_date": "Updated 1 June 2026 as displayed; England and Wales", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T12:12:35Z", "relevance": "Sections 2 to 8 distinguish legal boundary, physical features and general or determined boundaries; no inference of title from survey precision." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 30 April 2013", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T12:12:35Z", "relevance": "Entity, activity, agent, attribution, derivation and revision concepts support proposed evidence links; no legal-authority semantics implied." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "bundle-identity", "name": "Interest identity and basis", "description": "Identify the relationship and qualify its asserted recognition.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping supported by cited concepts; no source prescribes this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-identity", "name": "Interest identity", "description": "Separate the tenure relationship from a parcel, holder, document and register entry. A local identifier can identify an assertion without conferring legal recognition.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-identity", "name": "Qualified identity and aliases", "description": "Separate the tenure relationship from a parcel, holder, document and register entry. A local identifier can identify an assertion without conferring legal recognition.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-identity-1", "text": "Which authority namespace and identifier distinguish this interest from its parcel and register entries?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "interest_id, namespace, entry_refs, resource_refs, reconciliation_state", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-identity-2", "text": "Which profile-qualified interest type applies, including unknown or contested classification?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "type_code, vocabulary_version, jurisdiction_profile, assessment_status", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-identity-3", "text": "What evidence supports treating two records as the same continuing interest rather than separate claims?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "candidate_alias, supporting_evidence, merge_decision_ref, unresolved_difference", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-identity-identity", "name": "identity", "description": "Proposed nested field group: interest_id, namespace, entry_refs, resource_refs, reconciliation_state. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-identity-classification", "name": "classification", "description": "Proposed nested field group: type_code, vocabulary_version, jurisdiction_profile, assessment_status. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-identity-aliases", "name": "aliases", "description": "Proposed nested field group: candidate_alias, supporting_evidence, merge_decision_ref, unresolved_difference. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-identity", "name": "Interest identity register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-basis", "name": "Basis and recognition", "description": "Keep asserted basis and competent recognition separate. Unregistered, customary and informal interests must remain representable without a default finding of invalidity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-basis", "name": "Legal and customary recognition assertions", "description": "Keep asserted basis and competent recognition separate. Unregistered, customary and informal interests must remain representable without a default finding of invalidity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-basis-1", "text": "Which law, custom, instrument or decision is asserted as the basis, and who assessed its applicability?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "basis_ref, provision, version, jurisdiction, assessor, assessment_scope", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-basis-2", "text": "Is the interest claimed, recognized, contested or unresolved, and by which authority or community process?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "status, recognizing_body_ref, decision_ref, dissent, assessed_at", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-basis-3", "text": "How is an unregistered or informally evidenced claim preserved when no official title identifier exists?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "local_claim_id, evidence_form, recording_limit, referral_ref", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-basis-basis", "name": "basis", "description": "Proposed nested field group: basis_ref, provision, version, jurisdiction, assessor, assessment_scope. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "data-basis-recognition", "name": "recognition", "description": "Proposed nested field group: status, recognizing_body_ref, decision_ref, dissent, assessed_at. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "data-basis-unregistered", "name": "unregistered", "description": "Proposed nested field group: local_claim_id, evidence_form, recording_limit, referral_ref. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-basis", "name": "Basis and recognition register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-parties", "name": "Parties and affected resources", "description": "Bind party roles to separately mastered resource extents.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping supported by cited concepts; no source prescribes this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-holders", "name": "Holders and claimant roles", "description": "Represent multiple party roles and group holding without forcing equal numerical shares or equating occupation with entitlement. Party records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-holders", "name": "Parties, group holding and shares", "description": "Represent multiple party roles and group holding without forcing equal numerical shares or equating occupation with entitlement. Party records remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-holders-1", "text": "Who is asserted to hold or claim the interest, and in which role and form of joint or collective holding?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "party_refs, role_codes, holding_form, source_refs, contested_roles", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-holders-2", "text": "Where shares apply, what numerator, denominator and scope define each share, and how are unknown shares represented?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "party_ref, numerator, denominator, share_basis, scope, unknown_reason", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-holders-3", "text": "What mandate permits a representative to act for a holder or community for this specific matter?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "representative_ref, principal_ref, mandate_ref, action_scope, validity, disagreement", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-holders-holders", "name": "holders", "description": "Proposed nested field group: party_refs, role_codes, holding_form, source_refs, contested_roles. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-holders-shares", "name": "shares", "description": "Proposed nested field group: party_ref, numerator, denominator, share_basis, scope, unknown_reason. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-holders-mandate", "name": "mandate", "description": "Proposed nested field group: representative_ref, principal_ref, mandate_ref, action_scope, validity, disagreement. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-holders", "name": "Holders and claimant roles register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-object", "name": "Resource and extent", "description": "Link resource masters and versioned extent evidence. Whole-resource, partial, shared and nonexclusive scope remain distinct; mapped geometry alone does not determine the legal boundary.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-object", "name": "Referenced resource scope", "description": "Link resource masters and versioned extent evidence. Whole-resource, partial, shared and nonexclusive scope remain distinct; mapped geometry alone does not determine the legal boundary.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-object-1", "text": "Which resource identifiers and versions are affected, including interests spanning multiple parcels?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "resource_refs, versions, whole_or_part, linkage_evidence", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-object-2", "text": "What legal extent is asserted and how does it differ from the surveyed or occupied extent?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "extent_ref, legal_boundary_status, survey_ref, discrepancy, uncertainty", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-object-3", "text": "What scale, coordinate reference, accuracy and observation date qualify any linked spatial evidence?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "geometry_ref, crs_ref, scale, accuracy, method, observation_date, source", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-object-resources", "name": "resources", "description": "Proposed nested field group: resource_refs, versions, whole_or_part, linkage_evidence. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-object-extent", "name": "extent", "description": "Proposed nested field group: extent_ref, legal_boundary_status, survey_ref, discrepancy, uncertainty. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-object-spatial-evidence", "name": "spatial-evidence", "description": "Proposed nested field group: geometry_ref, crs_ref, scale, accuracy, method, observation_date, source. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-object", "name": "Resource and extent register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-scope", "name": "Temporal scope and powers", "description": "Express duration, permissions and responsibilities as qualified assertions.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping supported by cited concepts; no source prescribes this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-time", "name": "Duration and effectivity", "description": "Keep grant, asserted legal effect, registration and observation times distinct. Open-ended, date-only and discontinuous periods require explicit semantics.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-time", "name": "Time-qualified interest scope", "description": "Keep grant, asserted legal effect, registration and observation times distinct. Open-ended, date-only and discontinuous periods require explicit semantics.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-time-1", "text": "Which dates or intervals govern the asserted start and end of the interest, with what precision and basis?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "start, end, open_ended, precision, calendar, effect_basis", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-time-2", "text": "Does the use entitlement recur only in specified periods or depend on a condition or renewal decision?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "recurrence, condition_ref, renewal_ref, interpretation_status", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-time-3", "text": "When was each temporal assertion recorded, and which source establishes any difference from its effective date?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "assertion_ref, effective_time, recorded_at, source_ref, correction_ref", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-time-duration", "name": "duration", "description": "Proposed nested field group: start, end, open_ended, precision, calendar, effect_basis. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-time-availability", "name": "availability", "description": "Proposed nested field group: recurrence, condition_ref, renewal_ref, interpretation_status. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-time-time-lineage", "name": "time-lineage", "description": "Proposed nested field group: assertion_ref, effective_time, recorded_at, source_ref, correction_ref. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-time", "name": "Duration and effectivity register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-powers", "name": "Powers and responsibilities", "description": "Describe claimed use, exclusion, transfer or other powers and associated duties under a pinned profile. A described capability is not permission for an agent to act.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-powers", "name": "Permitted use and qualified obligations", "description": "Describe claimed use, exclusion, transfer or other powers and associated duties under a pinned profile. A described capability is not permission for an agent to act.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-powers-1", "text": "Which uses or actions are asserted to be permitted by this interest and within what resource scope?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "action_code, object_scope, basis_ref, beneficiary_ref, assessment_status", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-powers-2", "text": "Which obligations, consent requirements or conditions constrain exercising each asserted power?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "obligation_ref, responsible_party_ref, trigger, consent_ref, exception_basis", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-powers-3", "text": "What external authority must assess a proposed transfer or variation before its effect can be recorded?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "action_type, responsible_authority_ref, profile_ref, decision_evidence_required", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-powers-powers", "name": "powers", "description": "Proposed nested field group: action_code, object_scope, basis_ref, beneficiary_ref, assessment_status. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-powers-duties", "name": "duties", "description": "Proposed nested field group: obligation_ref, responsible_party_ref, trigger, consent_ref, exception_basis. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-powers-change-authority", "name": "change-authority", "description": "Proposed nested field group: action_type, responsible_authority_ref, profile_ref, decision_evidence_required. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-powers", "name": "Powers and responsibilities register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-registration", "name": "Recording and competing interests", "description": "Distinguish record status, legal effects and related burdens.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping supported by cited concepts; no source prescribes this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-recording", "name": "Recording and instruments", "description": "Track source entries, pending applications and extracts separately from recognition. An entry type has profile-specific evidential or legal effects; a notice is not proof of validity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-recording", "name": "Registration evidence and its limits", "description": "Track source entries, pending applications and extracts separately from recognition. An entry type has profile-specific evidential or legal effects; a notice is not proof of validity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-recording-1", "text": "Which instrument or register extract supports this assertion, and which edition or entry was actually inspected?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "record_ref, entry_ref, issuer_ref, version, extract_date, inspected_scope", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-recording-2", "text": "What is the registration or application status, including pending, refused, unregistered or unknown?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "register_ref, application_ref, status, status_date, reason_ref", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-recording-3", "text": "Which legal effect is supported for this entry type, and what does the evidence leave unproven?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "entry_type, profile_ref, effect_assessment, limitations, reviewer", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-recording-documents", "name": "documents", "description": "Proposed nested field group: record_ref, entry_ref, issuer_ref, version, extract_date, inspected_scope. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-recording-record-status", "name": "record-status", "description": "Proposed nested field group: register_ref, application_ref, status, status_date, reason_ref. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-recording-entry-effect", "name": "entry-effect", "description": "Proposed nested field group: entry_type, profile_ref, effect_assessment, limitations, reviewer. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-recording", "name": "Recording and instruments register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-priority", "name": "Related interests and burdens", "description": "Link burdens and competing interests without imposing a universal priority order. Registry notices and restrictions have different functions; mortgage interest and debt master are separate.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-priority", "name": "Restrictions and competing interests", "description": "Link burdens and competing interests without imposing a universal priority order. Registry notices and restrictions have different functions; mortgage interest and debt master are separate.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-priority-1", "text": "Which other interests benefit from, burden or compete with this interest, and over what shared scope?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "related_interest_ref, relation_type, affected_extent, evidence_ref", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-priority-2", "text": "Which restriction controls a proposed disposition, and what evidence of compliance or exception is required?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "restriction_ref, action_scope, condition_ref, exception_ref, assessment_status", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-priority-3", "text": "Who determined any priority assertion under which rule, and which competing priorities remain unresolved?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "interest_pair, asserted_rank, basis_ref, decision_ref, effective_scope, unresolved_reason", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-priority-links", "name": "links", "description": "Proposed nested field group: related_interest_ref, relation_type, affected_extent, evidence_ref. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "data-priority-restrictions", "name": "restrictions", "description": "Proposed nested field group: restriction_ref, action_scope, condition_ref, exception_ref, assessment_status. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "data-priority-priority", "name": "priority", "description": "Proposed nested field group: interest_pair, asserted_rank, basis_ref, decision_ref, effective_scope, unresolved_reason. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-priority", "name": "Related interests and burdens register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-continuity", "name": "Change and contestation", "description": "Preserve continuity and unresolved competing assertions.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping supported by cited concepts; no source prescribes this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-changes", "name": "Change and succession", "description": "Append supported changes while preserving predecessor and successor references. Local revision is not conveyance, renewal, registration or extinguishment.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-changes", "name": "Evidenced transitions and continuity", "description": "Append supported changes while preserving predecessor and successor references. Local revision is not conveyance, renewal, registration or extinguishment.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-changes-1", "text": "What grant, transfer, division, renewal or termination event is reported and which external record supports it?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "event_ref, type, actor_ref, instrument_ref, occurrence_time, certainty", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-changes-2", "text": "Does the change continue the same interest or create successor interests under the applicable profile?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "prior_interest_ref, successor_refs, continuity_rule, decision_ref", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-changes-3", "text": "Which asserted state is effective after the change, and what conditions or unresolved registration steps remain?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "state, effective_time, conditions, pending_steps, source_ref, reviewer", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-changes-events", "name": "events", "description": "Proposed nested field group: event_ref, type, actor_ref, instrument_ref, occurrence_time, certainty. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-changes-continuity", "name": "continuity", "description": "Proposed nested field group: prior_interest_ref, successor_refs, continuity_rule, decision_ref. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-changes-effect", "name": "effect", "description": "Proposed nested field group: state, effective_time, conditions, pending_steps, source_ref, reviewer. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-changes", "name": "Change and succession register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-disputes", "name": "Disputes and safeguards", "description": "Retain competing evidence and link competent review. Recognition and remedy processes remain external; no majority-of-records rule resolves entitlement.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-disputes", "name": "Contested assertions and remedy links", "description": "Retain competing evidence and link competent review. Recognition and remedy processes remain external; no majority-of-records rule resolves entitlement.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-disputes-1", "text": "Which assertion is disputed, by whom, and what supporting or contrary material is linked?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "assertion_ref, claimant_ref, grounds, evidence_refs, protected_view", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-disputes-2", "text": "Which case, review or remedy process owns resolution and which scoped outcome is available?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "case_ref, authority_ref, remedy_type, outcome_ref, finality_qualifier", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-disputes-3", "text": "What safeguards prevent a disputed or missing record from silently enabling exclusion, dispossession or a harmful disclosure?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "risk, review_gate, disclosure_scope, responsible_role, escalation_ref", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-disputes-challenge", "name": "challenge", "description": "Proposed nested field group: assertion_ref, claimant_ref, grounds, evidence_refs, protected_view. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-disputes-remedy", "name": "remedy", "description": "Proposed nested field group: case_ref, authority_ref, remedy_type, outcome_ref, finality_qualifier. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-disputes-safeguards", "name": "safeguards", "description": "Proposed nested field group: risk, review_gate, disclosure_scope, responsible_role, escalation_ref. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-disputes", "name": "Disputes and safeguards register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-assurance", "name": "Evidence and interoperability", "description": "Govern evidence views, retention and profile acceptance.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping supported by cited concepts; no source prescribes this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-evidence", "name": "Evidence and stewardship", "description": "Attribute every local assertion and transformation. Separate evidence integrity from legal validity, and revision lineage from perpetual retention of personal payload.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-evidence", "name": "Assertion provenance and controlled retention", "description": "Attribute every local assertion and transformation. Separate evidence integrity from legal validity, and revision lineage from perpetual retention of personal payload.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-evidence-1", "text": "Which source, actor and transformation produced this assertion, including oral or translated evidence where used?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "source_ref, actor_ref, activity_ref, method, language, transformation, assessed_at", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-evidence-2", "text": "Which parts may this recipient inspect, and which community, privacy or statutory restrictions govern the view?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "recipient_role, purpose, permission_basis, redactions, protected_scope", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-evidence-3", "text": "Which schedule and holds govern this local evidence payload and who authorizes correction or disposal?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "payload_ref, schedule_ref, hold_ref, custodian_ref, disposition_basis, tombstone_policy", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-evidence-lineage", "name": "lineage", "description": "Proposed nested field group: source_ref, actor_ref, activity_ref, method, language, transformation, assessed_at. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-evidence-views", "name": "views", "description": "Proposed nested field group: recipient_role, purpose, permission_basis, redactions, protected_scope. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-evidence-retention", "name": "retention", "description": "Proposed nested field group: payload_ref, schedule_ref, hold_ref, custodian_ref, disposition_basis, tombstone_policy. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-evidence", "name": "Evidence and stewardship register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-projection", "name": "Profiles and acceptance", "description": "The hierarchy and candidate fields are proposed design. ISO and INSPIRE alignments do not establish implementation conformance or reconcile differing legal systems.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-projection", "name": "Loss-aware interoperability and readiness", "description": "The hierarchy and candidate fields are proposed design. ISO and INSPIRE alignments do not establish implementation conformance or reconcile differing legal systems.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-projection-1", "text": "Which source and target profile versions define the mapping of parties, interests, resources and evidence?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "source_profile, target_profile, mapping_version, code_crosswalk, neighbor_bindings", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-projection-2", "text": "Which qualifiers or relationships are lost in a requested projection, and should that loss require refusal?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "field_path, lost_semantics, consequence, refusal_rule, reviewer", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-projection-3", "text": "What fixtures and qualified reviews demonstrate readiness, and which holds still prevent operational reliance?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "fixture_refs, schema_version, review_refs, results, unresolved_holds", "Preserve source, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-projection-mapping", "name": "mapping", "description": "Proposed nested field group: source_profile, target_profile, mapping_version, code_crosswalk, neighbor_bindings. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-projection-loss", "name": "loss", "description": "Proposed nested field group: field_path, lost_semantics, consequence, refusal_rule, reviewer. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-projection-acceptance", "name": "acceptance", "description": "Proposed nested field group: fixture_refs, schema_version, review_refs, results, unresolved_holds. Needs a profile-specific schema before instance validation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-projection", "name": "Profiles and acceptance register", "description": "Versioned local assertion index and references. Authoritative instruments and external masters retain independent identity.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "authorized document view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier plus namespace and revision first; otherwise governed IRI, then local UUID with reconciliation state. Use opaque entry sequence, never personal names.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "resolve-interest", "name": "Resolve an interest reference", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Resolve exact namespace and identifier without merging by holder name or map overlap.", "inputs": [ "qualified interest reference", "purpose" ], "outputs": [ "resolved reference or ambiguity report" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified role, purpose and access scope", "Source evidence and applicable profile identified; unresolved authority blocks authoritative changes", "Mutations require expected revision and idempotency key; mismatch causes refusal" ], "effects": [ "Read-only lookup; no entitlement determination" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "record-claim", "name": "Record a tenure assertion", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Append claimed basis, holder role and resource scope while preserving unrecognized and disputed status.", "inputs": [ "assertion and evidence", "party and resource references" ], "outputs": [ "local assertion revision or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified role, purpose and access scope", "Source evidence and applicable profile identified; unresolved authority blocks authoritative changes", "Mutations require expected revision and idempotency key; mismatch causes refusal" ], "effects": [ "Create a local record; no registration or recognition" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "link-evidence", "name": "Link supporting or contrary evidence", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Attribute evidence to an assertion without deciding truth or excluding competing sources.", "inputs": [ "assertion reference", "evidence reference and assessment" ], "outputs": [ "versioned evidence link or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified role, purpose and access scope", "Source evidence and applicable profile identified; unresolved authority blocks authoritative changes", "Mutations require expected revision and idempotency key; mismatch causes refusal" ], "effects": [ "Append provenance; preserve contrary evidence references" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "record-change", "name": "Record evidenced change", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Link an externally evidenced event and its assessed scope to predecessor and successor interests.", "inputs": [ "event and decision references", "effect assessment" ], "outputs": [ "change revision or unresolved-effect report" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified role, purpose and access scope", "Source evidence and applicable profile identified; unresolved authority blocks authoritative changes", "Mutations require expected revision and idempotency key; mismatch causes refusal" ], "effects": [ "Append local history; no transfer, extinguishment or external mutation" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "flag-conflict", "name": "Flag inconsistent assertions", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Report incompatible scoped assertions for authorized review; do not calculate legal priority or resolve title.", "inputs": [ "assertion pair", "scope and evidence" ], "outputs": [ "review issue or insufficient-evidence report" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified role, purpose and access scope", "Source evidence and applicable profile identified; unresolved authority blocks authoritative changes", "Mutations require expected revision and idempotency key; mismatch causes refusal" ], "effects": [ "Append a local conflict flag; external case remains separately mastered" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "export-view", "name": "Prepare a recipient-scoped projection", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Apply pinned mappings and permissions, refusing a projection that drops essential qualifiers.", "inputs": [ "recipient authorization", "interest revision", "target profile" ], "outputs": [ "local projection and loss report or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified role, purpose and access scope", "Source evidence and applicable profile identified; unresolved authority blocks authoritative changes", "Mutations require expected revision and idempotency key; mismatch causes refusal" ], "effects": [ "Create local artifact and access record; no transmission or expanded access" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-PLC-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate parcel binding, replacing semantic inheritance suggested by the registry parent. Parcel geometry and lifecycle stay external; not every resource requires this particular model.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "Party and community master", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Bind holder, claimant and representative identifiers; pin an actual neighbor before integration.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "Instrument and contract master", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Reference basis documents, contracts and register extracts without duplicating their lifecycle.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "Dispute case and decision master", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Reference scoped outcomes; this model does not adjudicate or enforce.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "Asset and resource master", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve building units or other tenure resources through a pinned domain profile.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "ISO 19152-1:2024", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Conceptual RRR, party, unit and source alignment from public abstract; licensed clauses and mapping pending.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "INSPIRE Cadastral Parcels 2024-07-31", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Parcel-reference projection only; rights and ownership are not harmonized by this spatial profile.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "PROV-O 2013-04-30", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Evidence attribution and derivation alignment; no proof of truth or legal authority.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Accountable tenure-record custodian and competent legal or customary review roles", "Jurisdiction and resource profile, vocabulary versions and authority evidence", "Namespace policy, access rules, retention schedule and escalation route" ], "namespace_guidance": "Use opaque authority-qualified interest IDs. A claim UUID identifies a record, not a legally recognized right.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-pol-027", "WM-PLC-002 candidate reference; verify and pin before operational use" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Preserve source assertions, assessed recognition and registration status separately.", "Never infer entitlement from possession, map overlap, document count or a local identifier." ], "patch_rules": [ "Append expected-revision changes with actor, reason, evidence and idempotency key.", "Correct by supersession; lawful payload erasure must not create a false assertion history." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Pin profile and vocabulary versions; treat changes to legal-effect or share semantics as incompatible until reviewed." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier with namespace and revision", "Governed persistent IRI with version", "Local opaque UUID with reconciliation state" ], "timestamp_rule": "Recording instants use RFC 3339 with seconds and an explicit offset or Z. Distinguish event, asserted legal-effect, registration and observation or ingestion time. Preserve date-only values, calendars, precision and unknowns without inventing midnight.", "serial_naming_rule": "Opaque interest key, artifact type and immutable sequence or revision; no names or addresses in filenames.", "integrity_rule": "Record digest, algorithm, source and transformation when available. Integrity is not authenticity, legal validity or evidence sufficiency." }, "policies": [ "Reviewable draft under single-provider waiver; independent external review remains outstanding.", "Jurisdiction-specific legal or customary authority must review operational profiles. The cited guidance does not create universal entitlement or registration rules.", "Public register visibility does not authorize bulk disclosure of supporting personal or community evidence. Apply purpose and recipient controls.", "Described rights and capabilities do not authorize agents to transfer, register, cancel, enforce, evict or expropriate. Such subjects remain at policy and reference level." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Return only recipient-authorized views with source, version and uncertainty qualifiers." ], "create": [ "Require local namespace, custodian, asserted type and evidence links; pending or unknown party/resource references remain explicitly unresolved." ], "update": [ "Append supported assertions using concurrency checks; local changes never mutate external rights or registers." ], "delete": [ "Custodian-approved retention schedules and legal holds govern local payload disposal and lawful minimal tombstones. The adopting Dimension records system owns disposition execution; no blanket perpetual retention of personal data.", "Local deletion does not extinguish a right, erase a competing claim from its master, or cancel a register entry." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Tenure-record custodian", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain local identity, revisions and stewardship" ] }, { "name": "Authorized recorder", "responsibilities": [ "Attribute assertions and evidence without deciding entitlement" ] }, { "name": "Qualified legal or customary reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Assess applicable profile, recognition and unresolved effects within evidenced competence" ] }, { "name": "Access and records officer", "responsibilities": [ "Approve recipient scope, retention holds and disposal" ] }, { "name": "Holder, claimant or representative", "responsibilities": [ "Provide and challenge evidence within verified role or mandate" ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny sensitive content access unless recipient, purpose and scope are authorized. Infrastructure ownership confers no tenure authority.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Statutory disclosure or an approved public view needs explicit basis and scope; preserve protected evidence separately.", "Community representation and disclosure disagreements require review, not an assumed blanket consent." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Record read, export, correction and disposal actor, purpose, scope, revision and outcome under a minimal-data retention rule." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "AGENTS.md", "spec.yaml", "Adopting Dimension policies and pinned jurisdiction profile", "Source evidence and unresolved holds" ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed tenure relationship structure for land and associated resources, with selected global voluntary, England and Wales registration, and EU spatial evidence. Separate frozen no-tools Codex self-audit completed. Source verification, independent review, jurisdiction profiles and executable conformance remain holds; this is a reviewable draft, not a universal title or legal decision engine.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Qualified interest identity and distinct entry/resource identifiers." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Evidenced changes and predecessor/successor links without executing them." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Parties, resource extents, instruments and competing interests referenced." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Separate effectivity, registration and observation; discontinuous periods supported as candidate fields." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Attributed assertions and evidence transformations." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Holder and claimant roles separate from custodian; group shares not forced to numeric fractions." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Research schema checked; nested instance schemas and operational fixtures remain missing." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Recipient and purpose scoped views; sensitive community evidence protected." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Profile-governed payload disposal and minimal lawful tombstones." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual alignments only; licensed ISO clauses and executable mappings unverified." }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Type, duration, share and assessed status are nonphysical properties; asset measurements remain external." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Claim, recognition, evidence and registration states stay distinct." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and actions", "status": "covered", "notes": "Powers are qualified descriptions; proposed local functions confer no legal authority." }, { "dimension": "regional coverage", "status": "gap", "notes": "Global voluntary framework plus selected England and Wales and EU spatial examples; no universal law claim." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Movable-asset and intellectual-property profiles, detailed fisheries/forestry and subsurface rights require specialist sources.", "Licensed LADM clauses, nested schemas, pinned neighbors, executable mappings and adversarial instance fixtures remain incomplete.", "Independent provider review and direct HTTP source/version verification remain open.", "Current national property, privacy, retention and customary-law applicability requires qualified review." ], "conflicts": [], "regional_assumptions": [ "FAO guidance is voluntary; it cannot establish an individual claim as legally valid.", "England and Wales registration and boundary examples are illustrative only, not Cyprus or global rules.", "INSPIRE concerns EU spatial exchange; it does not harmonize national property rights." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "A matching parcel ID or name cannot merge competing tenure interests.", "An unregistered customary claim remains representable; registration absence alone cannot erase it.", "A notice, hash or precise geometry cannot prove entitlement or exact legal extent.", "Local revision or deletion cannot transfer or extinguish a right.", "Equal shares, automatic priority and universal registration deadlines must not be inferred." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "relationship", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "The subject links holders or claimants to resource scope under a qualified interest and basis. Persistent record identity does not make it a parcel, party or instrument. The registry standalone-mm value is a catalogue-plane category, and its parcel parent is explicitly reconciled as a candidate reference." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Interest versus assertion record", "disposition": "accepted with qualification", "rationale": "Identity, basis, recognition and registration questions preserve attributed claims without certifying that the claimed interest exists or is legally recognized." }, { "concept": "Parcel parent and composition", "disposition": "reference accepted", "rationale": "The stated legal-interest purpose and source distinctions reject parcel inheritance. Geometry and parcel lifecycle remain external; the actual model binding is optional pending integration review." }, { "concept": "Unregistered and customary interests", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Missing registration does not erase a claim. Formal recognition is separately assessed, and voluntary guidance is not treated as proof of national legal validity." }, { "concept": "Group holding and representation", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Shares are conditional and need not be equal or numerical. Claimant, holder, custodian and representative are distinct roles, with explicit mandate and dispute information." }, { "concept": "Resource and spatial extent", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "The findings reference external geometry and its uncertainty while distinguishing surveyed, occupied and legal extent. Map overlap is not an identity or title decision." }, { "concept": "Temporal scope", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Grant, legal effect, registration and observation times stay distinct, with date-only precision, open periods and discontinuous availability preserved as candidate data." }, { "concept": "Notices restrictions and priority", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Entry type, recognition and legal effect are separately evidenced. A notice does not prove validity and no universal first-in-time or automatic priority rule is implemented." }, { "concept": "Capabilities and local functions", "disposition": "accepted as proposals", "rationale": "All six functions are explicitly unimplemented and limited to local lookup, recording, conflict flags or views. They do not transfer, register, extinguish, adjudicate or enforce rights." }, { "concept": "Evidence and retention", "disposition": "accepted with policy dependency", "rationale": "Provenance and integrity do not establish truth. Recipient-scoped access and profile-governed payload disposal reconcile record continuity with personal and community evidence protection." }, { "concept": "Supplement reconciliation", "disposition": "limited admission", "rationale": "Only source-supported distinctions were retained. Broad no-properties wording, automatic identifier equivalence and registrar-only assumptions were not generalized from the unreviewed supplement." }, { "concept": "Broad model name and research scope", "disposition": "limited", "rationale": "The declared researched core is land and associated tenure resources. Detailed other-asset and specialist resource profiles remain omissions rather than unsupported claims of completeness." }, { "concept": "Instance schemas and interoperability", "disposition": "deferred", "rationale": "Optional nested candidate groups and conceptual alignments cannot validate operational instances. Licensed clauses, bindings, crosswalks and adversarial fixtures remain explicit conformance holds." }, { "concept": "Provider and source assurance", "disposition": "waived and held", "rationale": "Codex is the sole admitted provider. Browser source readings are selective and ISO is abstract-only; direct HTTP checks were not attempted. The self-audit is not independent external review." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent under the owner-authorized single-provider waiver. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts; the separate local Codex no-tools self-audit is not an independent second-provider review.", "Direct HTTP and source/version verification remain incomplete. No direct requests were attempted because of the owner-reported sandbox block; zero HTTP 200 responses were measured. Seven official sources received selected browser review, ISO only at public-abstract level. The coordinator must run check_sources.py outside the sandbox and review current versions and source limitations.", "Qualified jurisdictional and customary-profile review remains required for recognition, legal effect, priority, consent, remedies, privacy and retention. Global voluntary guidance and England and Wales examples do not supply universal property law. Other asset classes and specialist resource regimes are deferred.", "Licensed ISO clauses, nested instance schemas, pinned neighbor bindings, executable mappings, licensing review and adversarial conformance fixtures remain incomplete. No legal-compliance or runtime certification is claimed.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Verify direct source retrieval, displayed versions, licensed clauses and current legal applicability with qualified reviewers for each adopting jurisdiction.", "Develop pinned schemas and mappings with fixtures for competing claims, collective holding, partial resources, disputed boundaries, discontinuous terms, corrections and lawful evidence disposal.", "Restore independent external review and research specialized resource or other-asset profiles before broader coverage or canonical promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 7, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 36, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }