mandateSource
The legal basis of each obligation to keep a register
constitutionalBasis`: mandates rooted directly in the constitution · `statutoryMandate`: mandates created by enacted statute
This meta-model describes which registers a polity must keep, on what legal basis, who is assigned as registrar for each, and which trust rules (public faith, correction, retention, access regime) govern them. It is its own model because it is the constitutional table of contents of the register landscape: every register-shaped model in the catalogue points here to prove that it exists by mandate rather than by habit, and registrar accountability is only checkable against an explicit mandate record.
The legal basis of each obligation to keep a register
constitutionalBasis`: mandates rooted directly in the constitution · `statutoryMandate`: mandates created by enacted statute
The registers themselves as defined obligations
registerDefinition`: identity, subject matter, uniqueness rules · `dataScope`: what each register must and must not record
How a mandated register must be run
registrarAssignment`: who operates each register · `publicFaith`: reliance and presumption rules for entries · `correction`: rectification and appeal procedure
Catalogue-native findings must describe the information grouped by each layer. This legacy version does not declare them separately.
Questions, artifact requirements and serial naming rules are required by Vercy vNext; they remain unassigned in this reference version.
Format-independent core. Concrete artifact formats and naming prefixes are not declared in this legacy version.
CRUD procedures and interface bindings are not declared in this legacy version.
The constitution-maker and the legislature own the mandate layer; each registrarAssignment then names the operating steward per register. The catalogue of mandates is public; any restricted operational detail is opened only by owner grant through S1 and S2.