application
What the applicant brings
submission`: applications, applicants, requested scope · `evidence`: documents and facts offered against criteria
This meta-model describes the application-to-grant process for regulated activity: submissions and the evidence offered with them, review against criteria, the decision to grant or refuse, and the lifecycle of conditions, renewals and revocations that follows a grant. The granted right itself is recorded in the rights register (R5); this model owns the process around it. It is its own model because permitting is a repeatable administrative procedure whose shape (criterion, evidence, decision, condition) is identical across domains that otherwise share nothing.
What the applicant brings
submission`: applications, applicants, requested scope · `evidence`: documents and facts offered against criteria
How the authority decides
assessment`: evaluation of criteria and consultations · `decision`: grant, refusal and stated reasons
What happens after grant
condition`: obligations attached to a grant · `monitoring`: compliance checks and renewals · `revocation`: suspension and withdrawal
Catalogue-native findings must describe the information grouped by each layer. This legacy version does not declare them separately.
Questions, artifact requirements and serial naming rules are required by Vercy vNext; they remain unassigned in this reference version.
Format-independent core. Concrete artifact formats and naming prefixes are not declared in this legacy version.
CRUD procedures and interface bindings are not declared in this legacy version.
The authorizing authority for each regulated domain (a mandated registrar or operator under A12) stewards its processes. Applicants always see their own file; all other access, including regulator exchange, is granted by the owner via S1 and S2.