offense
What happened and how it is classified
classification`: offense types mapped to the reference classification · `incidentRecord`: recorded offenses and involved parties
This meta-model describes the enforcement path from a recorded offense to a completed correction: classification and incident records, investigations with their evidence custody, charges and their referral into adjudication (A19), and the penalties and correction measures that follow a decision. It is its own model because enforcement records carry the strictest due-process constraints in the catalogue: their subjects hold adversarial rights over them, evidence must keep an unbroken chain of custody, and adjudication itself deliberately lives in a separate model.
What happened and how it is classified
classification`: offense types mapped to the reference classification · `incidentRecord`: recorded offenses and involved parties
Establishing the facts
conduct`: investigation lifecycle and measures · `evidenceCustody`: items, chain of custody, admissibility state · `chargeAndReferral`: charges and handover to adjudication
Consequences after decision
penalty`: imposed penalties and their terms · `corrections`: execution and supervision of penalties
Catalogue-native findings must describe the information grouped by each layer. This legacy version does not declare them separately.
Questions, artifact requirements and serial naming rules are required by Vercy vNext; they remain unassigned in this reference version.
Format-independent core. Concrete artifact formats and naming prefixes are not declared in this legacy version.
CRUD procedures and interface bindings are not declared in this legacy version.
The enforcement authority stewards investigations and sanctions as a mandated operator. Subjects hold guaranteed due-process access defined in A6 and delivered as S2 grants; all other access, including conviction exchange and statistics, is granted by the owner via S1 and S2 with S4 audit.