authority
Who is authoritative for which facts
authorityScope`: declared subject domains per register, no overlaps unresolved · `precedence`: which register wins when declarations collide, and how conflicts are settled
The reference-not-copy fabric between registers: which register is authoritative for what, how entries in one register point into another, and under what freshness and drift rules derived mirrors may exist at all. It is its own meta-model because inter-register topology, authority precedence and mirror hygiene are concerns of the federation as a whole, owned jointly by registrars, and belong to no single register.
Who is authoritative for which facts
authorityScope`: declared subject domains per register, no overlaps unresolved · `precedence`: which register wins when declarations collide, and how conflicts are settled
Pointing instead of copying
referenceRules`: what a cross-register reference must carry to stay resolvable · `resolutionRouting`: where a consumer resolves a given reference, including fallbacks
Derived copies under discipline
mirrorProvisioning`: when a mirror may exist, its scope and its marking as non-authoritative · `freshnessAndDrift`: staleness budgets, drift detection and reconciliation duties
Catalogue-native findings must describe the information grouped by each layer. This legacy version does not declare them separately.
Questions, artifact requirements and serial naming rules are required by Vercy vNext; they remain unassigned in this reference version.
Format-independent core. Concrete artifact formats and naming prefixes are not declared in this legacy version.
CRUD procedures and interface bindings are not declared in this legacy version.
Ownership is joint: the registrars party to each federation link own the link, its declarations and its routes, while each mirrored fact remains owned by its authoritative source register. Access to routes, mirrors and drift data is granted via the S1/S2 access and consent models and audited via S4.