violation
Noticing and investigating
signals`: anomalies from the audit log and reports from owners · `cases`: opened proceedings, gathered evidence, referral state
This meta-model describes what happens when the cluster's promises are broken: reads outside scope, onward sharing, retention past the deadline, grants ignored after revocation. It records signals, cases, established breaches, the sanctions imposed and the remedies delivered to the harmed party, plus each grantee's resulting standing. It is its own model because enforcement has a lifecycle and evidence discipline of its own, distinct from the contracts it protects and from the courts that decide contested cases.
Noticing and investigating
signals`: anomalies from the audit log and reports from owners · `cases`: opened proceedings, gathered evidence, referral state
Consequences and redress
sanctions`: consequences imposed on the violator · `remedies`: what the harmed party receives, from notification to erasure and restitution
The violator's ongoing status
complianceStatus`: a grantee's current standing across all cases · `reinstatement`: the path back to good standing after remedies are fulfilled
Catalogue-native findings must describe the information grouped by each layer. This legacy version does not declare them separately.
Questions, artifact requirements and serial naming rules are required by Vercy vNext; they remain unassigned in this reference version.
Format-independent core. Concrete artifact formats and naming prefixes are not declared in this legacy version.
CRUD procedures and interface bindings are not declared in this legacy version.
An enforcement registrar archetype keeps cases, sanctions and standing, acting alongside the courts (A19) that decide contested matters. It owns process records only: evidence stays anchored in S4, the harmed owner's rights stay theirs, and reads of enforcement data follow S1/S2 like everything else.