EM-DAT-07 · Subject model · W2
Analytical study and conclusion
Analysis question, population, method, result, limitations and recommendation. A report shows results but does not replace the justification of the conclusion.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- AnalyticalStudy
- AnalysisMethod
- AnalyticalFinding
- Recommendation
Deep research questions
- When is correlation mistakenly interpreted as causation?
- How to record the sample and exclusions?
- How to link a recommendation to a decision?
Verifiable invariants
- A conclusion has a scope of applicability
- An assumption is separated from an observation
- A recommendation is not treated as an adopted decision
End-to-end acceptance scenario
Two alternative interpretations of one dataset and a biased sample preserve the limitations and do not create a false causal claim.
Negative case
A chart of growing tickets proves a drop in an employee's productivity.
Approaches to compare
- W3C DCAT: dataset, distribution, catalog
- W3C PROV and Data Cube: provenance and observation
- SDMX and BI/data catalog practice: indicators, breakdowns, definitions and releases
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-ACT-034 · Assessment / Evaluation · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-KNW-007 · Claim / Proposition · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.