EM-KNW-03 · Subject model · W2
Communication and collaborative meeting
Meeting, participants, agenda, channel, discussion and outcomes. An assignment and a decision are created as separate objects with provenance.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- Meeting
- MeetingParticipation
- CommunicationChannel
- DiscussionThread
- MessageReference
Deep research questions
- How to distinguish presence from consent?
- What is carried over from a discussion into an official fact?
- How to observe access rules for the original communication?
Verifiable invariants
- Minutes do not prove everyone's consent
- A decision has an authority
- A quote preserves its source and access scope
End-to-end acceptance scenario
A discussion creates a task and a decision proposal, but only an authorized action changes the official status.
Negative case
A phrase in a chat is automatically treated as an approved policy.
Approaches to compare
- W3C PROV: claims, sources and actions
- SKOS: concepts, definitions and mapping
- DMS/wiki/ADR practice: document, version, carrier and decision
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-ACT-025 · Meeting / Session · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-REC-012 · Minutes / Transcript · unversioned · not installed automatically
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.