EM-LEG-02 · Subject model · W2
External norms and applicability
Versions of external requirements, territories, addressees and justified applicability assessments. The model does not make a legal decision in place of the responsible specialist.
Partially published; research continues
Claude: complete-frozen-study-and-single-audit-remediated; Grok: complete-exact-prompt.
Published results
Research note, in Russian: Canonical/runtime promotion remains governed by the package allocation, identity and dependency holds.
Subject boundary and candidate types
- ExternalRequirement
- NormVersion
- ApplicabilityAssessment
- Jurisdiction
Deep research questions
- How to distinguish publication, entry into force and application?
- How to store exemptions and transition periods?
- How to mark conflicting applicability assessments?
Verifiable invariants
- A norm has a verifiable source
- An assessment contains context and an author
- A legal interpretation is not presented as the text of the norm
End-to-end acceptance scenario
Verify a norm change with a future effective date and two justified interpretations for different markets.
Negative case
A reference to a law automatically proves the company's compliance.
Approaches to compare
- OASIS UBL/FIBO: agreements, parties and obligations
- ODRL: permission, prohibition, duty and constraint
- Primary legal sources of selected jurisdictions; subject-matter verification of applicability is mandatory
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-POL-001 · Legal Instrument / Norm · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.