EM-LND-13 · Landscape · W2
Landscape of data, reports and analytics
Data provenance, indicator semantics, report releases and analytical conclusions.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- DataLandscape
- AnalyticalLineageView
Deep research questions
- Which reports will a metric definition change affect?
- Where do identical names hide different formulas?
- Which conclusions rely on incomplete data?
Verifiable invariants
- Definition and run are distinguished
- Provenance is not invented
- Projections respect the rights of the source facts
End-to-end acceptance scenario
A formula change shows the affected definitions and the specific releases produced with a different methodology.
Negative case
An identical KPI title makes two reports comparable.
Approaches to compare
- Vercy composition and whole-object: a separate landscape object and delegation
- ArchiMate/ISO 42010: views, questions and representation rules
- Compare participant subject models and the practical assembly of a permitted context
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-DAT-001 · Dataset · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-DAT-005 · Data Pipeline · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-DAT-006 · Data Lineage · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-DAT-008 · Data Catalog Entry / Data Product · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.