EM-LND-15 · Landscape · W2
Risk and compliance landscape
Links between requirements, risks, controls, assessments and findings over an explicit perimeter.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- RiskLandscape
- AssuranceCoverageView
Deep research questions
- Where is coverage by a requirement or a control missing?
- How to distinguish having a document from being effective?
- Which conclusions are no longer applicable?
Verifiable invariants
- Coverage is not compliance
- An assertion has evidence
- An exception keeps its expiry
End-to-end acceptance scenario
The map reveals a control without execution, a requirement without applicability and an expired exception.
Negative case
100% completed cards prove full compliance.
Approaches to compare
- Vercy composition and whole-object: a separate landscape object and delegation
- ArchiMate/ISO 42010: views, questions and representation rules
- Compare participant subject models and the practical assembly of a permitted context
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-XCT-027 · Risk / Control · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-KNW-015 · Risk / Opportunity · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-ACT-033 · Review / Inspection / Audit · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.