EM-LND-16 · Landscape · W2
Knowledge and decisions landscape
Semantic links between documents, concepts, assertions, evidence and decisions.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- KnowledgeLandscape
- DecisionDependencyView
Deep research questions
- Which decisions will a refuted fact affect?
- Where is a source missing?
- Which terms have incompatible meanings?
Verifiable invariants
- A link is not an equality
- Evidence has a limitation
- Third-party rights do not vanish in the index
End-to-end acceptance scenario
Refuting shared evidence shows the affected decisions, and prohibited sources are not exposed.
Negative case
A search index exposes closed correspondence through a summary.
Approaches to compare
- Vercy composition and whole-object: a separate landscape object and delegation
- ArchiMate/ISO 42010: views, questions and representation rules
- Compare participant subject models and the practical assembly of a permitted context
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-KNW-006 · Concept / Term · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-KNW-010 · Decision / Rationale · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-REC-001 · Document / Record · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.