EM-LND-17 · Landscape · W2
Sites and assets landscape
Placement, ownership, usage and maintenance of assets in space.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- AssetPlaceLandscape
- OccupancyView
Deep research questions
- Where is the asset physically located and who is responsible?
- How to distinguish a placement plan from the actual placement?
- Which sites are unavailable for a task?
Verifiable invariants
- Location and asset are not merged
- A placement has a period
- Personal location is protected by policy
End-to-end acceptance scenario
A leased asset moves between two sites with a history of placement and responsibility.
Negative case
The company's registered address is treated as the location of all its assets.
Approaches to compare
- Vercy composition and whole-object: a separate landscape object and delegation
- ArchiMate/ISO 42010: views, questions and representation rules
- Compare participant subject models and the practical assembly of a permitted context
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-BLT-006 · Facility · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card. - WM-BLT-008 · Site / Campus · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.