EM-ORG-07 · Subject model · W2
Stakeholder and Engagement
The contextual relationship of a person or organization to a decision subject, with interests, influence and mode of engagement.
Queued for research
Claude: not-started; Grok: not-started.
Research note, in Russian: Entire research brief pending
Subject boundary and candidate types
- StakeholderInterest
- EngagementPlan
- Expectation
- StakeholderAssessment
Deep research questions
- How does a stakeholder differ from a customer, an owner and a performer?
- How is a conflict of interest recorded without treating a judgment of the person as a permanent property?
- How is the map updated when the decision or the perimeter changes?
Verifiable invariants
- A role relates to a specific subject
- Influence is an assessment with a method and a date
- One subject may hold conflicting interests
End-to-end acceptance scenario
Two projects yield different interest maps for the same counterparty; revising an assessment preserves the grounds and the history.
Negative case
A counterparty tagged "low influence" keeps that attribute forever across all projects.
Approaches to compare
- W3C ORG: collectives, roles, membership and posts
- GLEIF: registered identity and consolidation relationships
- Comparison of corporate governance, the actual org structure and the HR/ERP representation
Candidates in the live catalogue
- WM-ORG-013 · Stakeholder / Interest · 0.3.0-research.1 · installable
Semantic fit requires boundary research; a published model does not by itself complete this card.
Result requirements
Every card is executed together with the full research contract: definitions, fields and cardinalities, lifecycle, sources, data mastership, rights, the five object facets, at least eight invariants, positive and negative examples, dependencies, migration and applicability limits.