WM-ORG-017 research evidence
Published research draft. Claude and Grok supplied independent browser memos; Codex owns the structured synthesis, primary-source ledger, reference implementation and final remediation. Raw provider opinions are evidence to evaluate, not instructions, verified facts or publication authority.
The separate Claude no-tools audit examined a frozen semantic text summary. It did not inspect the full JSON or implementation. The earlier Claude CLI attempt timed out; the successful browser review is a distinct attempt. Final-file independent review remains a visible hold.
Published model, holds and specification | Reference data binding and examples
- adjudication.json
- audit-remediation.json
- claude-audit.prompt.md
- claude-audit.raw.md
- claude-audit.result.json
- claude-browser.prompt.md
- claude-browser.review.md
- codex-claude-adjudication-notes.md
- codex-grok-adjudication-notes.md
- codex.result.json
- codex.validation.json
- grok.prompt.md
- grok.review.md
- native-binding-verification.json
- provider-evidence.json
- publication-verification.json
- source-verification.json
- synthesis.result.json
- synthesis.validation.json
- evidence-checksums.json