Decision, claim and evidence
Claim, evidence, argument, alternatives and decision, including ADR. Evidence can support multiple assessments without copying.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Note: Research contour: bundles not designed yet; questions are listed as open questions.
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Enterprise profiles
- Category
- Enterprise subject
- Entry kind
- subject
- Domain
- EnterpriseKNW
- Industry
- Cross-industry
- Tags
- EM-KNW-02W1subjectClaimEvidenceArtifactArgumentDecisionDecisionAlternative
What it is Filled
Claim, evidence, argument, alternatives and decision, including ADR. Evidence can support multiple assessments without copying.
Why it exists Filled
Claim, evidence, argument, alternatives and decision, including ADR. Evidence can support multiple assessments without copying.
Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review
- A claim has an author and a context
- Evidence is not automatically true
- Revoking a decision does not erase the rationale
What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review
Must not
- Negative case: A reference to a document turns any claim into an established fact.
Note: Negative case of the research brief, not yet a rule for agents.
Moral aspects Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Owners Filled
Steward
Владелец базы знаний / корпоративных записей
Master systems
- DMS
- wiki
- журнал решений
Links to other meta-models Filled
neighbor
- EM-DAT-07
- EM-KNW-01
- EM-LEG-01
- EM-ORG-03
- EM-PRD-04
- EM-WRK-02
references
- WM-KNW-010 - conceptual-candidate
- WM-REC-010 - conceptual-candidate
- WM-KNW-007 - conceptual-candidate
- WM-KNW-008 - conceptual-candidate
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete
Identity and identifiers required Derived, awaiting review
- Claim
- EvidenceArtifact
- Argument
- Decision
- DecisionAlternative
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Enterprise record contour: physical properties belong to referenced world models.
Recognition required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Capabilities and actions required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Hazards and failure modes required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Standards and interfaces required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Context of use required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Sources Filled
- W3C PROV: claims, sources and actions
- SKOS: concepts, definitions and mapping
- DMS/wiki/ADR practice: document, version, carrier and decision
Open questions
- How to distinguish an observation from an interpretation?
- What happens when evidence is refuted?
- How to preserve rejected alternatives?
- Установить границу и решение reuse/extend/new по действующим спецификациям.
- Подтвердить semantic crosswalk, права и source mastership.
- Выбрать immutable refs; провести проверки fixtures до заявления о публикационной готовности.
Machine files
Provenance
enterprise research programme · published-partial
Built from: enterprise/models/em-knw-02/brief.json
Still in Russian: suggested owner, blocking decisions, vercy candidates. Translate in research/enterprise/i18n/units.en.json.