EM-XCT-09 · Enterprise profiles · Published 0.1.0

Enterprise Classification Review

Validate company category assignments and narrowing profiles, preserve ambiguous crosswalks, and propose version-migration candidates without changing subject identity.

4 bundles · 8 layers · 19 findings · 38 questions

Required adoption limits

Use only with a complete frozen scheme release, an exact finite profile and independently authorized host context. Preserve every applicable correspondence before profile filtering. Treat candidate-only as a proposal; read the capacity, custody and native-binding limits before installation.

Publication addendum and exact limits

Use in a Company Dimension

Start with a complete frozen scheme release, a finite slot profile and an assignment snapshot. Review restrictions without an assignment when needed. Three synthetic contexts and a separately tested native binding illustrate use.

Research assurance: reviewable-draft. This is a bounded original companion. Original offline assessment dialect. Scheme owners and live business subjects stay external. Scores, correspondence and a passing review confer no identity or write authority. Adoption limits.

Bundles → Layers → Findings → Questions

Collect the expected evidence for each question. Unknown context remains explicit. Listed actions confer no operational permission.

CR-B1Review context2 layers

Govern review context within a bounded classification review.

CR-L1Identity and custody3 findings

Make identity and custody explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F1

Packet identity

Sealed packet. Assemble a new immutable revision under the host owner.

Questions
  1. CR-Q1 Which local review is this?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Sealed packet
  2. CR-Q2 Which revision and previous content digest does it preserve?decision
    Expected answer
    • Sealed packet
    • Assemble a new immutable revision under the host owner.
Artifacts
  • Sealed packetLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Assemble a new immutable revision under the host owner. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F2

Source sovereignty

Source and capture inventory. Reference original authorities and retain capture provenance.

Questions
  1. CR-Q3 Who owns the scheme, binding and correspondence meanings?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Source and capture inventory
  2. CR-Q4 Which copies are explicitly snapshots?decision
    Expected answer
    • Source and capture inventory
    • Reference original authorities and retain capture provenance.
Artifacts
  • Source and capture inventoryLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Reference original authorities and retain capture provenance. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F3

Read authority

Host context. Ask the host for a current scoped context; never self-authorize.

Questions
  1. CR-Q5 Which authenticated actor may read the complete packet for this purpose?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Host context
  2. CR-Q6 Does the independent grant match exact packet bytes and current interval?decision
    Expected answer
    • Host context
    • Ask the host for a current scoped context; never self-authorize.
Artifacts
  • Host contextLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Ask the host for a current scoped context; never self-authorize. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-L2Integrity and time2 findings

Make integrity and time explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F4

Byte integrity

Integrity checks. Verify frozen bytes and ask the custodian about external authenticity.

Questions
  1. CR-Q7 Do local snapshot digests match the captured envelopes?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Integrity checks
  2. CR-Q8 What does the separately declared source digest actually prove?decision
    Expected answer
    • Integrity checks
    • Verify frozen bytes and ask the custodian about external authenticity.
Artifacts
  • Integrity checksLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Verify frozen bytes and ask the custodian about external authenticity. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F5

Time frames

Temporal frame table. Keep assertion, validity, capture and assessment clocks separate.

Questions
  1. CR-Q9 What was known at the knowledge cut?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Temporal frame table
  2. CR-Q10 Which effective and target instants are being assessed?decision
    Expected answer
    • Temporal frame table
    • Keep assertion, validity, capture and assessment clocks separate.
Artifacts
  • Temporal frame tableLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Keep assertion, validity, capture and assessment clocks separate. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-B2Profiles and categories2 layers

Govern profiles and categories within a bounded classification review.

CR-L3Release membership3 findings

Make release membership explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F6

Qualified codes

Qualified category set. Preserve exact strings; obtain missing qualifications.

Questions
  1. CR-Q11 Which publisher scheme and release qualify this lexical code?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Qualified category set
  2. CR-Q12 Could an identical label or code belong to another scheme?decision
    Expected answer
    • Qualified category set
    • Preserve exact strings; obtain missing qualifications.
Artifacts
  • Qualified category setLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Preserve exact strings; obtain missing qualifications. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F7

Complete enumeration

Completeness statement. Return insufficient-context when closure cannot be established.

Questions
  1. CR-Q13 Is the frozen enumeration complete for this review?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Completeness statement
  2. CR-Q14 Who verifies absent codes and missing expansions?decision
    Expected answer
    • Completeness statement
    • Return insufficient-context when closure cannot be established.
Artifacts
  • Completeness statementLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Return insufficient-context when closure cannot be established. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F8

Historical selectability

Historical and target checks. Preserve history and assess new eligibility independently.

Questions
  1. CR-Q15 Was the recorded category valid at the effective instant?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Historical and target checks
  2. CR-Q16 Is it active and selectable for a new target assignment?decision
    Expected answer
    • Historical and target checks
    • Preserve history and assess new eligibility independently.
Artifacts
  • Historical and target checksLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Preserve history and assess new eligibility independently. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-L4Profile restriction2 findings

Make profile restriction explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F9

Identity-preserving restriction

Profile ancestry assessment. Refuse changed meaning or version as a disguised restriction.

Questions
  1. CR-Q17 Does the child retain class, unit, slot and meaning?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Profile ancestry assessment
  2. CR-Q18 Are parent and release pins exact?decision
    Expected answer
    • Profile ancestry assessment
    • Refuse changed meaning or version as a disguised restriction.
Artifacts
  • Profile ancestry assessmentLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Refuse changed meaning or version as a disguised restriction. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F10

Set and cardinality restriction

Restriction and coverage findings. Inspect affected subjects before adopting narrower rules.

Questions
  1. CR-Q19 Does the child only remove values and tighten counts?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Restriction and coverage findings
  2. CR-Q20 Does removing categories leave subjects unclassifiable?decision
    Expected answer
    • Restriction and coverage findings
    • Inspect affected subjects before adopting narrower rules.
Artifacts
  • Restriction and coverage findingsLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Inspect affected subjects before adopting narrower rules. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-B3Assignments and correspondence2 layers

Govern assignments and correspondence within a bounded classification review.

CR-L5Assignment evidence2 findings

Make assignment evidence explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F11

Assertion versus suggestion

Assignment snapshot. Retain stated origin and ask the source owner to resolve status.

Questions
  1. CR-Q21 Is this an asserted, proposed, disputed or withdrawn source?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Assignment snapshot
  2. CR-Q22 What method/version produced model suggestions?decision
    Expected answer
    • Assignment snapshot
    • Retain stated origin and ask the source owner to resolve status.
Artifacts
  • Assignment snapshotLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Retain stated origin and ask the source owner to resolve status. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F12

Competing revisions

Source selection decision. Keep competing revisions and request explicit host selection.

Questions
  1. CR-Q23 Which single source assertion is authoritative for this review?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Source selection decision
  2. CR-Q24 Is a correction preserved without editing its predecessor?decision
    Expected answer
    • Source selection decision
    • Keep competing revisions and request explicit host selection.
Artifacts
  • Source selection decisionLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Keep competing revisions and request explicit host selection. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-L6Correspondence evidence3 findings

Make correspondence evidence explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F13

Mapping meaning

Captured correspondence. Keep n:m associations intact; never invent pairwise exactness.

Questions
  1. CR-Q25 Is the relation exact, close, broader, narrower, related or compound?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Captured correspondence
  2. CR-Q26 Are multiple or empty sides preserved as one association?decision
    Expected answer
    • Captured correspondence
    • Keep n:m associations intact; never invent pairwise exactness.
Artifacts
  • Captured correspondenceLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Keep n:m associations intact; never invent pairwise exactness. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F14

Mapping authority

Approval basis. Obtain independent acknowledgment; score is not approval.

Questions
  1. CR-Q27 Who approved the exact snapshot/entry and on what evidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Approval basis
  2. CR-Q28 Does the host acknowledgment match after a changed snapshot?decision
    Expected answer
    • Approval basis
    • Obtain independent acknowledgment; score is not approval.
Artifacts
  • Approval basisLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Obtain independent acknowledgment; score is not approval. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F15

Competing targets

Alternative eligibility table. Route ambiguity to a steward without ranking by confidence.

Questions
  1. CR-Q29 Are all applicable alternatives visible before profile filtering?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Alternative eligibility table
  2. CR-Q30 Does exclusion of one target conceal an unresolved conflict?decision
    Expected answer
    • Alternative eligibility table
    • Route ambiguity to a steward without ranking by confidence.
Artifacts
  • Alternative eligibility tableLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Route ambiguity to a steward without ranking by confidence. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-B4Assessment and adoption2 layers

Govern assessment and adoption within a bounded classification review.

CR-L7Disposition and limits2 findings

Make disposition and limits explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F16

Bounded migration candidate

Candidate or refusal. Propose only; use a separate authorized workflow for any business change.

Questions
  1. CR-Q31 Is there one eligible direct target under complete declared context?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Candidate or refusal
  2. CR-Q32 Would a chain or a model-ID replacement exceed this contract?decision
    Expected answer
    • Candidate or refusal
    • Propose only; use a separate authorized workflow for any business change.
Artifacts
  • Candidate or refusalLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Propose only; use a separate authorized workflow for any business change. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F17

Reproducible assessment

Assessment snapshot. Recompute consistency and preserve distinct assessment identities.

Questions
  1. CR-Q33 Can the exact evaluator reproduce the saved result?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Assessment snapshot
  2. CR-Q34 Did input, approval basis or build change?decision
    Expected answer
    • Assessment snapshot
    • Recompute consistency and preserve distinct assessment identities.
Artifacts
  • Assessment snapshotLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Recompute consistency and preserve distinct assessment identities. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-L8Native use and migration2 findings

Make native use and migration explicit through evidence and checks.

CR-F18

Native binding and disclosure

Native installation report. Validate separately and keep host disclosure controls.

Questions
  1. CR-Q35 Were both outer V3 and installed nested validation run?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Native installation report
  2. CR-Q36 Does the restricted aggregate disclose only what its owner permits?decision
    Expected answer
    • Native installation report
    • Validate separately and keep host disclosure controls.
Artifacts
  • Native installation reportLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Validate separately and keep host disclosure controls. Host permission and source verification remain required.
CR-F19

Version and records lifecycle

Loss/refusal and retention decision. Refuse unsupported conversion; preserve the original sealed record.

Questions
  1. CR-Q37 Can an older version preserve all meanings and evidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • Loss/refusal and retention decision
  2. CR-Q38 Who retains superseded packets and records repeated imports?decision
    Expected answer
    • Loss/refusal and retention decision
    • Refuse unsupported conversion; preserve the original sealed record.
Artifacts
  • Loss/refusal and retention decisionLocal assessment evidence or referenced host/source evidence; not an automatic authority grant.
Actions and unknown handling
  • Refuse unsupported conversion; preserve the original sealed record. Host permission and source verification remain required.

Research and validation

Actual Claude Opus 5 High and Grok Heavy design studies were followed by a complete frozen R1 audit. Claude blocked a contradictory same-release capture while Grok accepted with limits; author reproduction also found a cached-ancestry bypass. R2 corrected both defects and related conservative gaps. Separate cumulative R2 audits from both providers accept with limits. Author-executed60 behavior tests and three new synthetic native Dimensions are separate evidence, not reviewer execution. Executed tests and native checks are recorded separately. Research dossier · Review and limits · Tests · Native acceptance · Checksums.

Catalogue identity: vr.profile.enterprise-classification-review. EM-XCT-09 remains a broader, partially covered research contour. Parent models are semantic references; no subtype or whole-parent conformance is asserted.