← Back to catalogue
Published

cause

vr.tr.cause · thing-cause

Let an agent reason about causes carefully, distinguish causation from correlation, apply causal frameworks in science, medicine and law, and explain the aetiology of conditions with evidence.

Thing Registry Activities and processes ACT.EVT

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions

Identify Finding causes.

Candidates

Candidate causes.

Candidates

Candidates.

  1. What are the plausible causes of this outcome, and what evidence supports each? definition
  2. Are there confounders or reverse causation? boundary

Types

Kinds of cause.

Types

Types.

  1. Is this cause necessary, sufficient, proximate or contributing? definition
  2. Are multiple causes interacting? boundary
Science Causal inference.

Inference

Establishing causation.

Inference

Inference.

  1. Which methods, such as experiments or causal inference from observational data, can establish causation here? action
  2. What are the limits of the evidence? boundary

Aetiology

Causes of disease.

Aetiology

Aetiology.

  1. What is known about the aetiology of this condition, according to medical sources? provenance
  2. Is the user asking about the cause of their own symptoms? boundary
Law Legal causation.

Tests

Causation tests.

Tests

Tests.

  1. How do legal tests such as but-for and proximate cause work, in general terms? provenance
  2. Is the user asking for legal advice? boundary

Root

Root cause analysis.

Root

Root cause analysis.

  1. How can a root cause analysis be structured for this incident? action
  2. Which contributing factors should be recorded? action
Reason Everyday reasoning.

Fallacies

Causal fallacies.

Fallacies

Fallacies.

  1. Does this argument commit a causal fallacy such as post hoc or single cause? boundary
  2. How can it be corrected? action

Explain

Explaining causes.

Explain

Explaining.

  1. How can the causes of this event be explained clearly with appropriate uncertainty? action
  2. Are competing explanations attributed? boundary

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Activities and processes
Entry kind
noun.event
Plane
ACT
Domain
ACT.EVT
Facets: substance
activity
Facets: origin
conceptual
Facets: agency
inert
Facets: mobility
not-applicable
Facets: scale
not-applicable
Facets: affordances
observable
Other names and narrower kinds
antecedent, etiology, aetiology, factor, fundamental, parameter, unknown quantity, wild card, producer, mutagenesis, insertional mutagenesis, releasing factor

What it is Filled

An event, condition or agent that produces an effect or brings something about, studied as causation in philosophy, science, medicine as aetiology, law and everyday reasoning, with distinctions such as necessary, sufficient, proximate and contributing causes; establishing causes requires evidence beyond correlation.

Why it exists Filled

Let an agent reason about causes carefully, distinguish causation from correlation, apply causal frameworks in science, medicine and law, and explain the aetiology of conditions with evidence.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Generative relation
  • Evidence-based
  • Multiple types
  • Domain-specific criteria

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Present a correlation as a proven cause in health, safety or policy claims.
  • Name a person or group as the cause of harm without evidence.
  • Give a single cause for a complex event when the evidence shows several.
  • Claim to have established the cause of an individual's illness or death.

Only with a human decision

  • Publishing causal findings that assign blame or liability.

May

  • Explain kinds of causation and how causes are established in science, medicine and law.
  • Distinguish correlation from causation when presenting data.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Wrongly assigned causes lead to blame, scapegoating and wrong treatment.
  • Causal claims drive policy that affects many people.

Who is affected

  • People blamed for events
  • Patients
  • The public relying on findings

Owners Filled

Steward

Nobody owns the concept; it is held in common by philosophy and science.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • oewn-07338522-n - registry parent class

related

  • event - category
  • beginning - origins
  • hypothesis - causal hypotheses
  • unrelatedness - absence of causal link

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.cause
  • Open English WordNet: oewn-07341157-n

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Plane ACT: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • Produces an effect
  • Necessary, sufficient or contributing
  • A correlation is not by itself a cause
  • Not physical; a relation between events.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • identify candidate causes of an outcome
  • distinguish correlation from causation
  • apply causal criteria and frameworks
  • explain aetiology and legal causation

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Confusing correlation with causation
  • Single-cause thinking
  • Post hoc reasoning

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • Bradford Hill considerations in epidemiology
  • Legal tests of causation
  • Root cause analysis standards

Context of use required Filled

  • Understanding why things happen.
  • physical causes
  • aetiology of diseases
  • legal causation
  • social and economic causes
  • root causes in engineering

Sources Filled

  1. Open English WordNet 2024, synset oewn-07341157-n - sense and gloss of the concept
  2. Wiktionary: cause - word senses and usage

Open questions

  • Should causation be a separate entry?
  • How should causal inference methods be linked?
  • How should legal tests be localised?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-cause/spec.json