Grandmaster
Enable an agent to identify a chess Grandmaster title holder, assess the evidence and status of that designation, and distinguish the title from current playing strength or employment.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read
Researched by: Codex
Purpose and description
Enable an agent to identify a chess Grandmaster title holder, assess the evidence and status of that designation, and distinguish the title from current playing strength or employment.
In the chess sense used here, a grandmaster is a player awarded the Grandmaster (GM) title by the International Chess Federation (FIDE) in recognition of exceptional competitive achievement.
It can be Resolve a Grandmaster claim to an exact title system and person.; Check a claimed award against the awarding authority's records.; Assess qualification evidence against the rules applicable to the claimed route and date.; Explain why title possession alone does not establish current strength, coaching competence or employment.; Check whether a documented title satisfies an opportunity's explicit eligibility conditions.; Flag conflicting records and identify the evidence needed to resolve them..
Distinguishing features
A formal title claim identifies an awarding authority and exact designation; descriptive praise such as 'grandmaster-level' does not establish an award.
Evidence of strong play or a high rating is distinguishable from evidence that the authority actually conferred the title.
The title belongs to a specified chess discipline and title system; identical wording in another system does not establish equivalence.
The person holding the title is distinct from the title category, an application for it and a paid role performed by that person.
An abbreviated or translated designation must resolve to its exact title category rather than silently merging separate Grandmaster designations.
Scope
+ The precise Grandmaster designation, chess discipline and awarding authority
+ The relationship between a person and an awarded title
+ Qualification evidence and the applicable version of award requirements
+ Award decisions, recorded title status and unresolved discrepancies
+ The distinction between title recognition, current performance and eligibility for title-dependent opportunities
- A person's complete biography or identity model
- Chess rules, positions and individual game analysis
- Tournament organization and complete competition results
- Employment contracts, coaching qualifications and job advertisements
- Grandmaster ranks in martial arts or leadership offices in orders
- Complete models of other chess titles
Characteristics
- Exact title designation
- Authority-recorded title name, abbreviation and language Prevents informal labels, translations and distinct title categories from being treated as interchangeable.
- Chess discipline
- Discipline specified by the awarding system; unresolved when absent Constrains which qualifications, records and comparisons apply.
- Awarding authority
- Link to the organization responsible for conferring the designation Establishes whose rules and decisions determine title recognition.
- Title holder
- Link to a person, supported by an authority identifier where available Attaches the award to the correct individual without conflating title and person.
- Award date
- Calendar date with recorded precision; unknown if unsupported Locates the award in its historical rule context and distinguishes it from application or announcement dates.
- Qualification route
- Route documented under the applicable authority rules; unresolved if not established Prevents an agent from imposing one qualification pathway on every award.
- Title status
- Authority-recorded status, observation date and unresolved discrepancies Separates what the authority records from an agent's interpretation or an unsupported public claim.
- Claim verification
- Unverified, supported, conflicting or insufficiently identified Makes uncertainty about a title claim explicit without inventing an official status.
- Current playing activity
- Activity assessment with discipline, observation period and evidence; unknown where unavailable Keeps participation and recent performance separate from title recognition.
Also called
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 5 bundles · 9 layers · 16 findings · 27 questions.
Grandmaster sense and title system Establishes which meaning of Grandmaster and which chess title system the record concerns.
The registry name is ambiguous, and even a chess interpretation requires an exact designation and discipline.
Intended Grandmaster sense
Tests the provisional chess interpretation against registry provenance.
Registry sense resolution
The chess interpretation remains provisional until the registry's originating reference establishes its intended meaning.
- Which originating registry or linked reference identifies what Grandmaster means here? provenance
- Does that reference denote a chess title holder, a title category, or a different social role? boundary
Exact chess designation
Separates the named title from adjacent designations and other chess disciplines.
Authority and designation match
A usable title claim identifies the exact designation, awarding body and discipline rather than relying on the word Grandmaster alone.
- What exact title name and abbreviation does the awarding authority use? definition
- Which discipline and neighboring title categories must be distinguished from this designation? boundary
Qualification and conferral Connects the claimed award to its qualification route, supporting evidence and actual conferral.
Meeting apparent performance criteria and receiving a Grandmaster title are different claims requiring different evidence.
Applicable qualification route
Identifies the rules and pathway relevant to this particular award.
Route-specific requirements
Qualification assessment must use a documented route and rule version; numerical thresholds and exceptions remain research questions.
- Which rule version and qualification route applied when this award was considered? provenance
- What rating, norm, result or other evidence does that route require, and how is each requirement measured? measurement
- Does the authority document an alternative or exceptional route relevant to this award? boundary
Award decision
Distinguishes an application or claimed qualification from an authoritative award.
Conferral evidence
The model requires evidence of conferral before treating a qualification claim as an awarded title.
- Which authority record establishes that the Grandmaster title was conferred on this person? provenance
- Which recorded date denotes conferral, and how does it differ from application, approval or announcement dates? definition
Holder identification and standing Attaches the title to the correct person and records what is known about its standing.
Namesakes, name changes and conflicting records can produce false title attributions even when the title system is clear.
Holder record resolution
Resolves the individual associated with the title without absorbing their full biography.
Person-to-award link
The title-holder relationship needs sufficient identifying evidence to avoid assigning one person's award to another.
- Which authority identifier connects the title record to this person? provenance
- Do spelling variants, name changes or federation changes refer to the same holder or to different people? boundary
Recorded title standing
Separates authoritative title status from verification uncertainty and participation restrictions.
Standing and discrepancies
Title standing must follow explicit authority evidence; absence from a search result or a participation restriction should prompt investigation rather than an inferred title change.
- What title status does the authority record, and as of what date? provenance
- Does any documented restriction affect the title itself, competition participation, or both? boundary
- What additional record or authority clarification would resolve conflicting title claims? action
Title use and performance boundaries Guides decisions that use Grandmaster standing while limiting unsupported conclusions about present ability or professional authority.
A Grandmaster title can be relevant to selection and recognition, but individual opportunities and competence claims require additional evidence.
Title versus current strength
Keeps awarded standing distinct from recent competitive performance.
Performance context
Current-strength assessments require dated, discipline-specific evidence in addition to a verified title.
- Which rating system, playing format and observation date support the current-strength assessment? measurement
- What recent activity evidence is needed before describing the holder as an active competitor? measurement
Title-dependent opportunities
Checks the role of Grandmaster standing in entry, selection, representation and professional claims.
Eligibility and competence limits
An agent should match the verified title to explicit opportunity conditions and separately verify qualifications for coaching or other paid work.
- Does the specific event or opportunity accept this exact Grandmaster designation, and what additional conditions apply? action
- Which separate evidence supports any claim that the holder is qualified or authorized to coach, officiate or perform another professional role? boundary
- How should the title be presented so its awarding system and verified standing are clear? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.
A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.
Reported evidence
Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.
Check these first
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- No sense is recorded: this description assumes the FIDE over-the-board chess title, but the registry identity should be checked before adopting that interpretation.
- Grandmaster titles in correspondence chess and chess composition belong to distinct qualification systems and are outside this description.
- This is recall only; exact title thresholds, exceptions and applicable regulation editions have not been verified.
- Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Identifiers and schemes
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- FIDE title abbreviation - GM - Identifies the title, not an individual player.
- FIDE ID - Numeric player identifier - Identifies a registered player whose record can include the GM title; having an ID does not establish grandmaster status.
- Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Standards and regulation
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- FIDE Title Regulations, issued by the International Chess Federation, govern international over-the-board chess titles.
- FIDE Rating Regulations govern the rating system used in assessing playing strength.
- Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Real-world use
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Recognising a player's attained level of competitive chess achievement.
- Displaying player credentials in tournament entries, results and commentary.
- Informing tournament invitations and the assessment of title-norm opportunities.
- Providing a credential relevant to chess coaching, authorship and commentary.
- Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Typical measurements
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Playing strength - No fixed range defines all title holders; current rating and title status are distinct. - FIDE rating points
- Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Failure modes and hazards
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Treating the title as an occupation or employment contract rather than a qualification held by a person.
- Inferring title possession solely from a player's rating.
- Assuming all uses of grandmaster refer to the same awarding body or qualification.
- Confusing Grandmaster with Woman Grandmaster, which is a separate FIDE title.
- Treating the title as evidence of teaching competence without examining coaching experience.
- Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Regional variation
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- FIDE's GM title is international, while national federations may also award domestic titles.
- Outside chess, grandmaster can designate ranks or leadership positions in martial arts and orders; their recognition and requirements depend on the institution.
- Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart
Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.
- Chess player - A chess player need not hold any formal title; a chess grandmaster holds the specific GM title.
- International Master - IM is a separate FIDE title with different qualification requirements.
- Woman Grandmaster - WGM is a separate title for women; GM is open to players of any gender.
- World chess champion - A world championship is won through a championship competition; GM is an awarded title held by many players.
- Chess coach - Coaching is a teaching role; holding the GM title does not itself establish that role.
- Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Grandmaster this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance
What the second pass must settle
- Does the registry's originating reference confirm chess Grandmaster, and does it primarily denote the title or the person holding it?
- Which chess discipline, awarding authority and exact Grandmaster designation belong within this entry's authoritative granularity?
- What qualification routes, numerical requirements and historical rule changes must be represented after reading authoritative sources?
- What rules govern title duration, withdrawal and the distinction between title standing and participation restrictions?
- Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept, requiring a registry link rather than a separate publication?