← Back to catalogue
Research draft

immunity

vr.tr.immunity · thing-q1059

Enable an AI agent to recognise the immune system, explain its components and defensive functions, assess the limits of evidence about immune responses and protection, and identify decisions requiring qualified clinical judgement.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.OBJ

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

Researched by: Codex

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

5 bundles · 10 layers · 10 findings · 20 questions

Protection claim Defines whose immunity is being described, against what and with which meaning of protection.

Host and challenge

Establishes the biological bearer and target of the claim.

Bounded immunity target

Record the host, relevant compartment and challenge at the specificity justified by evidence.

  1. Which host and anatomical compartment carry the claimed immunity? definition
  2. Which challenge, variant or antigen is covered, and which related challenges remain outside the claim? boundary

Protected outcomes

Separates different meanings and degrees of protection.

Endpoint-specific protection

Record whether the claim concerns prevention, control or reduced harm, with any supported degree of protection.

  1. Does protection mean preventing infection, controlling burden, preventing disease or reducing severity? definition
  2. Under what exposure conditions and over what observation period was this outcome assessed? measurement
Defence and acquisition Records the contributions and origins proposed to account for protection.

Immune contributions

Identifies relevant innate, humoral and cellular contributions without requiring a complete immune-system model.

Supported defence mechanisms

Separate observed immune activity from mechanisms inferred to contribute to protection.

  1. Which innate or adaptive contributions are observed, inferred or unresolved for this protection claim? definition
  2. What evidence links each recorded contribution to the specified protective endpoint? provenance

Acquisition and memory

Distinguishes sources of protection and evidence of a retained response capacity.

Origin of protective capacity

Record relevant exposure, immunisation or transfer history, keeping acquisition history separate from demonstrated immunity.

  1. Which documented events or constitutive defences are proposed to explain this immunity? provenance
  2. What evidence distinguishes immune memory from currently present effectors or passively acquired components? measurement
Evidence and inference Connects immunity claims to measurements, observed outcomes and explicit inference limits.

Immune measurements

Preserves the context needed to interpret an immune indicator.

Interpretable assay evidence

Record assay identity, specimen, timing, result and the basis for any protective interpretation.

  1. What was measured, in which specimen, by which method, at what time and in which units? measurement
  2. What source supports using this indicator or threshold to infer protection for this host context, challenge and endpoint? provenance

Outcome-based support

Assesses whether observed outcomes justify the claimed protection.

Protection inference limits

Record directness of evidence, alternative explanations and uncertainty when applying outcomes to a host.

  1. What exposure and outcome evidence supports protection, and could limited exposure or another factor explain the outcome? provenance
  2. Does the evidence concern this host or a reference population, and what limits transfer between them? boundary
Persistence and context Tracks how the applicability of an immunity claim depends on time, host condition and challenge conditions.

Temporal course

Records observed onset, persistence and changes in evidence of protection.

Time-bounded protection

Distinguish measured change, inferred persistence and periods lacking evidence.

  1. When was protective capacity assessed, and what repeated observations establish its course? measurement
  2. Beyond which date or follow-up interval would continued protection be an unsupported extrapolation? boundary

Changed protection conditions

Identifies changes that may invalidate an earlier assessment.

Reassessment triggers

Record relevant changes in host condition, treatment, challenge identity or exposure context.

  1. Which host or challenge conditions differ from those under which protection was established? boundary
  2. Which documented change should trigger reassessment, and what evidence would resolve it? action
Decision use and limits Makes the consequences and limits of relying on an immunity claim explicit.

Claim-dependent actions

Connects a proposed action to the precise protection it requires.

Action evidence fit

Record the decision, its required protective endpoint and the authority governing its use.

  1. What action depends on immunity, and does the available evidence address the endpoint and time horizon that action requires? action
  2. Which applicable guidance or qualified decision-maker determines whether that evidence is sufficient? provenance

Unresolved or discordant status

Handles missing evidence, conflicting indicators and outcomes inconsistent with the claim.

Uncertainty resolution

Preserve disagreement and define an appropriate route to clarify immunity without silently converting uncertainty into a binary status.

  1. Which measurements, histories or observed outcomes conflict, and which part of the protection claim remains unresolved? boundary
  2. What additional record, validated assessment or qualified review could resolve the uncertainty relevant to the proposed action? action

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.OBJ
Other names and narrower kinds
lymphoid tissue, Bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue, tertiary lymphoid structure, diffuse lymphoid tissue, nodular lymphoid tissue, epithelium-associated lymphoid tissue, negative T cell selection, negative thymic T cell selection, negative extrathymic T cell selection, mononuclear phagocyte system, avian immune system, adaptive immune system

What it is Filled

In the supplied sense, immunity refers to the immune system, the biological system of cells, tissues, organs and molecules that coordinates innate and adaptive responses to pathogens and other threats.

In scope

  • Immune cells, tissues, organs and molecules and their relationships within a host are in scope.
  • Innate and adaptive immune functions and their coordination are in scope.
  • Immune recognition, response regulation, tolerance and memory are in scope.
  • Responses to exposure, immunisation and passive transfer are in scope.
  • Evidence about immune function and the limits of laboratory or observational indicators of protection are in scope.
  • Changes in immune function over time and under altered host or challenge conditions are in scope.
  • Immune dysfunction, including immunodeficiency, allergy and autoimmunity, is in scope at a general explanatory level.

Out of scope

  • Legal, diplomatic or institutional immunity is outside this model.
  • Pathogen identity, evolution and transmission beyond their relevance to immune system function are outside this model.
  • Diagnosis and treatment of infections, allergies, autoimmune disease or immunodeficiency are outside this model.
  • Vaccine and medicinal-product manufacture, prescribing and administration are outside this model.
  • Population-level herd protection and epidemic dynamics are outside this model.

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to recognise the immune system, explain its components and defensive functions, assess the limits of evidence about immune responses and protection, and identify decisions requiring qualified clinical judgement.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • The immune system is an organized biological system of interacting components, while immunity to a specified challenge describes a protective capacity.
  • Innate and adaptive mechanisms contribute to immune defence through distinct but coordinated functions.
  • Immune recognition and regulation support defence while limiting inappropriate responses against the host.
  • A detectable immune response does not by itself establish protection against infection or disease.
  • Absence of illness without evidence of exposure or protective capacity does not establish immunity.
  • This biological system concerns host defence; exemption from a rule, jurisdiction or obligation belongs to a different sense of the term.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Tell a person they are immune from a single result or past illness.
  • Spread false claims about vaccines or natural immunity.
  • Use immunity status to exclude people beyond lawful public health rules.
  • Disclose a person's immune status without consent.

Only with a human decision

  • Decisions on vaccination or immune treatment for a person require qualified human judgement.

May

  • Explain immune system components, functions and their relationship to protection in general terms from medical sources.
  • Point people to clinicians and public health advice for vaccination and testing.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Immunity status has been used to grant or deny access to work and travel.
  • Misinformation about immunity puts vulnerable people at risk.

Who is affected

  • Immunocompromised people
  • Children
  • Health workers

Owners Filled

Steward

No organization owns the immune system as a biological concept; health services steward individual clinical records.

Master systems

  • Clinical records document individual assessments of immune function.
  • Vaccination registries record immunisation history.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q188193 - registry parent class
  • Q30336093 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.immunity
  • Wikidata: Q1059 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1059)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Host and protected compartment: Host reference and relevant tissue, organ, mucosal surface or systemic compartment
  • Challenge specificity: Challenge reference, relevant variant or antigen, and known limits of cross-protection
  • Protective endpoint: Acquisition prevention; replication or burden control; disease prevention; severity reduction; other specified endpoint
  • Mechanistic contribution: Innate; adaptive humoral; adaptive cellular; mixed; unresolved
  • Acquisition route: Constitutive defence; prior exposure; immunisation; passive transfer; mixed; unknown
  • Protective evidence status: Supported for a specified endpoint; partially supported; conflicting; unsupported; unassessed
  • Immune indicator result: Assay-specific value, unit, specimen, method, collection time and interpretation reference
  • Protection estimate: Endpoint-specific probability or relative effect, with exposure context, time horizon, uncertainty and estimation method; unknown when unavailable
  • Temporal applicability: Assessment date, observed follow-up, supported applicability interval and reassessment triggers

Recognition not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Immunity cannot be identified visually because protection is inferred from biological history, functional evidence and relevant testing.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Formulate a bounded immunity claim for a host, challenge, compartment and protective endpoint.
  • Attach exposure history, immune measurements and outcome evidence to the claim.
  • Compare assessments only after checking endpoint, assay, challenge and temporal compatibility.
  • Flag unsupported extrapolation from immune markers to protection or from one challenge to another.
  • Identify missing evidence and conditions that warrant reassessment.
  • Record how an immunity claim supports or limits a proposed action, referring clinical decisions to applicable guidance and qualified review.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • False sense of protection leading to infection.
  • Waning immunity that goes unnoticed.

Standards and interfaces not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

No single standard, law or official classification applies universally to biological immunity itself.

Context of use required Filled

  • Immunity is studied in biology and healthcare to understand how a host resists infection or other biological challenges.
  • Its specificity, strength and duration inform interpretation of vaccination history, previous infection and laboratory evidence of protection.
  • Evidence of immunity must be interpreted for the particular host and challenge because protection can be incomplete or change over time.

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q1059: immune system - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Immune system - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Does vr.tr.immunity intend biological immunity, and how should its placement in PHY.OBJ represent a capacity borne by a host?
  • Does an existing Vercy world model already own this concept, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?
  • Should this entry cover immunity across animals, plants and microorganisms, or should its initial applicability be explicitly narrower?
  • Where should the boundary lie between immunity, constitutive physical barriers, disease tolerance and noninfectious immune targets?
  • Which authoritative sources establish usable correlates of protection, interpretation limits and reassessment criteria for each supported host-challenge pair?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q1059/spec.json