Mirabilia Urbis Romae

Title plus textual correspondence

Record the supplied title alongside opening words, closing words, characteristic passages and the authority supporting identification.

1. What textual evidence identifies this candidate as Mirabilia Urbis Romae beyond its catalogue title? definition
2. Which inspected witness, edition or scholarly description supports that identification? provenance

Membership boundary

Treat translation, adaptation, excerpting and independent composition as distinct relationships requiring evidence.

1. Is this candidate a version of the registered work, an adaptation requiring a separate work identity, or an independent description of Rome? boundary
2. Could its identification have been confused with Master Gregory's description or another similarly titled Roman text? boundary

Dated attribution

Record composition intervals and proposed responsibility as sourced hypotheses, distinguishing internal clues from later testimony.

1. What evidence bounds the composition date of the earliest recoverable textual stage? measurement
2. What supports each proposed author or compiling institution, and which textual stage does the attribution concern? provenance

Version relationships

Record evidenced relationships among Latin versions, translations and adaptations; multilingual and derivative transmission is discussed in [Poucet's study](https://bcs.fltr.ucl.ac.be/fe/24/Mirabilia/Mira_01.htm).

1. Which additions, omissions or reordered passages distinguish this version from its proposed source? measurement
2. Is the proposed derivation supported by textual comparison, editorial argument or merely a catalogue assertion? provenance

Place identification

Keep the text's wording, candidate referents, identification evidence and uncertainty together.

1. Which monument or place might this passage identify, and what alternative identifications remain? boundary
2. Does the passage supply a spatial relationship, an enumeration or a route instruction, and what mapping action does that support? action

Claim status

Represent a monument's narrated origin or significance as a claim made in a specific passage before evaluating its historical support.

1. What exactly does this passage claim, and does it present the claim as observation, inherited account or explanation? definition
2. Which independent evidence supports, contradicts or leaves unresolved the claim about the monument? provenance

Component extent

Record repository identifiers and folio or page boundaries; neighbouring works remain separately identifiable. A [Freiburg catalogue record](https://dl.ub.uni-freiburg.de/diglit/mirabilia1509) illustrates a Mirabilia printing bound after an Indulgentiae text.

1. Which shelfmark and folios or pages contain the relevant Mirabilia text? provenance
2. Are adjacent indulgence lists or church calendars part of this textual version, separate works, or later binding companions? boundary

Attested versus edited reading

Distinguish manuscript or print readings from expanded abbreviations, normalised spelling, conjectures and OCR output.

1. Which witness readings and editorial interventions underlie the wording quoted here? provenance
2. What must be checked against an image or critical apparatus before this passage can support a comparison? action

Function evidence

Treat pilgrimage, antiquarian description, civic representation and other proposed uses as interpretations whose support may differ across the tradition.

1. What evidence supports the claimed audience or use of this particular version? provenance
2. Does describing it as a pilgrim guide fit the passages and witness context under discussion? boundary

Usable extract

An extract should identify its version, edition or witness, stable locator, editorial treatment and applicable reuse conditions.

1. Which Latin text or translation should supply this extract, and how will readers locate and verify it? action
2. What reuse conditions apply separately to the selected translation, apparatus, transcription and manuscript images? action

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Mirabilia Urbis Romae this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance