← Back to catalogue
Research draft

doctrine

vr.tr.doctrine · INF.KNW

Let an agent explain doctrines by field, source and interpretation, attribute them to the bodies that hold them, and keep military doctrine at a general, non-operational level.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain doctrines by field, source and interpretation, attribute them to the bodies that hold them, and keep military doctrine at a general, non-operational level.

A codified set of beliefs, principles or positions taught or held by a group, such as religious doctrines, legal doctrines developed by courts, economic doctrines and military doctrines described at a general level; dogmatism is rigid adherence to doctrine.

What it is for: Understanding systems of belief, legal principles and policy.

It can be identify the source and holder of a doctrine; explain legal doctrines in general terms; describe religious doctrines as traditions state them; compare economic doctrines with attribution.

Distinguishing features

Codified principles

Held by a group

Transmitted through teaching or precedent

Can be contested

What it looks like

Not physical; set out in texts, rulings, catechisms and policy documents.

How it is recognised

Formal statements of principle

Court-developed legal doctrines

Personal opinions are not doctrine

Related models

is a kind of - category

school of thought

is related to - principles

value

is taught in - text

catechism or textbook

is related to - legal principles

justice

In practice

Families and kinds

religious doctrines

legal doctrines

economic doctrines

foreign policy doctrines

military doctrine (general level)

Standards and regulation

No specific regulation; courts and religious authorities define their doctrines

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting a group doctrine as universal truth

Providing operational military detail

Misstating legal doctrines

Also called

dogmatismmilitary doctrinereligious doctrineDeposit of faithlegal doctrineeconomic doctrineinnatismbipartisanshipabstention doctrineMachiavellianismcontinuationismphilosophical theoryChristian eschatological viewpolice doctrineScientology beliefPublic policy doctrines for the exclusion of relevant evidencepolitical doctrineBaraitaQuick Reaction AlertUnrestricted WarfareAirLand Battleinvasion-defense doctrinetheosophical doctrinedoctrines of Caodaismview of life and deathTiantai doctrinedoctrines of the Huayan Schooldoctrines of JainismChristian doctrineAhmadiyya doctrinedharmamudrāKompetenz-kompetenzlegal doctrine in Francepublic trust doctrineundue influenceFair dealing in United Kingdom lawRoman Catholic social teaching on workformal innatisminnateness hypothesisEpistemological Theories

+11

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Source repository Registry entry point

Also registered as vr.tr.doctrine

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Source Where it comes from.

Sources matter.

Holder

Who holds it.

Holder

Holder.

  1. Which group, court or institution holds this doctrine? provenance
  2. Which text states it? provenance

Change

Development.

Change

Development.

  1. How has this doctrine developed over time, according to scholars? provenance
  2. Is it disputed within the group? boundary
Legal Legal doctrines.

Courts develop doctrines.

Explain

Meaning.

Explain

Legal doctrine.

  1. What does this legal doctrine mean, in general terms, and which cases established it? provenance
  2. Does it apply in this jurisdiction? provenance

Advice

Limits.

Advice

Advice limits.

  1. Is the user asking how the doctrine applies to their own case? boundary
  2. Where can legal help be found? provenance
Religious Religious doctrines.

Beliefs are attributed.

Teaching

Teachings.

Teaching

Religious teaching.

  1. What does this tradition teach on this point, according to its authoritative sources? provenance
  2. Do other traditions differ? boundary

Dogmatism

Rigid adherence.

Dogmatism

Dogmatism.

  1. How do scholars distinguish doctrine from dogmatism? provenance
  2. Is the term being used as criticism? boundary
Policy Economic and military.

General level only.

Economic

Economic doctrines.

Economic

Economic doctrines.

  1. What does this economic doctrine hold, and who advocates or criticises it? provenance
  2. Is the summary balanced? boundary

Military

Military doctrine.

Military

Military doctrine limits.

  1. Does the request seek operational or tactical doctrine detail? boundary
  2. How should the agent stay at a general, published-policy level? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should doctrine types be separate entries?
  • How should authoritative texts be linked?
  • How should military doctrine be limited?
Draft as JSON