violence
Let an agent handle violence factually and neutrally, prioritise safety and support resources, and never help to plan or commit violence.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent handle violence factually and neutrally, prioritise safety and support resources, and never help to plan or commit violence.
The intentional use of physical force or power against oneself, another person or a group that results in or is likely to result in injury, death, psychological harm or deprivation, including interpersonal, collective and structural forms.
What it is for: Understanding, preventing and responding to violence.
It can be recognise and report it; support survivors; prevent it through public health and policy; study its causes and patterns.
Distinguishing features
Intentional use of force or power
Self-directed, interpersonal and collective types
Treated as a public health issue by WHO
Agents must not facilitate it
What it looks like
Not described in detail here; recorded in reports, statistics and testimonies.
How it is recognised
Official statistics and reports
Typologies from WHO
Historical persecutions merged in aliases are separate topics
Related models
is a kind of - behaviour
can cause - consequence
is prohibited by - law
occurs in - context
In practice
Families and kinds
self-directed violence
interpersonal violence: family, partner, community
collective violence: war, persecution, genocide
structural violence
Standards and regulation
WHO World Report on Violence and Health typology
Criminal law
Istanbul Convention on violence against women
Genocide Convention
Failure modes and hazards
Facilitating violence, which must be refused
Graphic or sensational descriptions
Victim blaming
Missing a person in danger who needs help
Also called
+209
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Also registered as vr.tr.violence-state
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Types What kind.
Typology guides response.
Typology
WHO types.
Typology
Type of violence.
- Which type of violence is being discussed? definition
- Which definition is used? provenance
Context
Where and between whom.
Context
Context.
- In what context does it occur? definition
- What data describe it? provenance
Safety People at risk.
Safety comes first.
Risk
Immediate danger.
Risk
Immediate risk.
- Is anyone in immediate danger? boundary
- Which emergency number applies? action
Support
Services.
Support
Support services.
- Which support services can help survivors? action
- Are they confidential? definition
Prevention Reducing violence.
Evidence-based prevention works.
Programmes
Evidence-based.
Programmes
Prevention programmes.
- Which prevention approaches have evidence? provenance
- Who runs them? provenance
Law
Legal protection.
Law
Legal protections.
- Which legal protections apply? boundary
- How are reports made to police? action
Handling Responsible discussion.
Language and limits matter.
Refusal
No facilitation.
Refusal
Declining harmful requests.
- Is the request seeking help to harm someone? boundary
- How should the agent decline and offer support? action
Language
Non-sensational.
Language
Respectful language.
- Is the description factual and non-graphic? boundary
- Does it avoid blaming victims? boundary
What the second pass must settle
- Should types of violence be separate entries?
- How should agents respond when someone is at risk?
- The registry entry has merged aliases on historical persecution; should they be split into their own entries?