← Back to catalogue
Published

Papaver rhoeas

vr.tr.papaver-rhoeas · thing-q130201

Enable an AI agent to recognise Papaver rhoeas, assess its life stage and reproductive state, and choose evidence-supported observation, cultivation, conservation or control actions.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.LIV

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 18 findings · 28 questions

Recognition and taxon boundary Establish whether an observed plant or attributed sample belongs to Papaver rhoeas.

Diagnostic organ combination

Combine pedicel, capsule and leaf evidence from the same plant.

Concordant identification

Record which diagnostic characters agree, which conflict and which were unavailable.

  1. Do upper pedicel hairs, mature capsule proportions, capsule surface and leaf attachment jointly support P. rhoeas? definition
  2. Were the diagnostic photographs and measurements taken from the same individual, and which regional key was applied? provenance

Variation and unresolved material

Handle unusual flowers, immature plants and detached material without forcing a species assignment.

Limits of determination

Distinguish documented variation from missing evidence or a competing taxon interpretation.

  1. Can the observed colour or flower form be linked to documented P. rhoeas variation or a verified cultivated accession? provenance
  2. Does seed-only, seedling-only or conflicting material require an unresolved Papaver record pending additional evidence? boundary
Annual development and condition Track the observed developmental course and condition of plants through a local growing season.

Stage and season

Record dated rosette, flowering and fruiting observations without imposing a universal calendar.

Observed developmental trajectory

Represent simultaneous stages and distinguish direct observations from inferred transitions.

  1. Which stages are present on the plant, and when were emergence, first flower and first mature capsule actually observed? measurement
  2. Which local observations support the expected timing of the next stage? provenance

Damage and senescence

Assess whether visible decline accompanies normal maturation or an unresolved stress.

Condition relative to reproduction

Connect symptoms to affected organs and capsule development while leaving untested causes open.

  1. Which leaves, stems, buds or capsules are affected, and what proportion of reproductive structures remains intact? measurement
  2. Does the evidence justify intervention, diagnostic sampling or observation through expected senescence? action
Flowering, seed and recruitment Follow reproductive observations from flowers to released seed and later seedlings.

Flower to capsule

Separate flower visitation from demonstrated reproductive success.

Reproductive outcome

Link observed flowers to developing capsules and any tested seed outcome.

  1. Of the flowers followed, how many produced capsules containing apparently filled seed? measurement
  2. What evidence distinguishes a recorded flower visitor from an effective pollinator of these plants? boundary

Release and next cohort

Track capsule opening, attributable seed and subsequent emergence.

Seed contribution and persistence

Record release and recruitment evidence without treating unseen seed reserves as measured.

  1. How many capsules are closed, open or emptied, and has seed release been directly observed? measurement
  2. What seed testing or repeated emergence evidence supports viability and local persistence beyond the current plants? provenance
Occurrence and establishment context Locate plants within their sowing, disturbance and recruitment history.

Origin and local status

Separate planting history from independently established regional status.

Attributable occurrence

Link the occurrence to seed provenance and an authoritative local status assessment when available.

  1. Is this occurrence traceable to sowing, a seed mixture or a documented earlier population? provenance
  2. Which geographic authority and evidence support its local native, introduced, established or uncertain status? boundary

Disturbance and repeated emergence

Relate recruitment observations to cultivation, soil exposure and competing vegetation.

Establishment evidence

Compare dated cohorts and site changes without assigning a cause from co-occurrence alone.

  1. What emergence counts followed recorded soil disturbance, sowing or vegetation change within the same survey area? measurement
  2. Can repeated recruitment be distinguished from repeated sowing or incoming seed? boundary
Purpose-led intervention Choose and verify actions using identification, reproductive state and the purpose of the site.

Retention, propagation and collection

Assess whether plants or seed are suitable for a stated conservation, display or collection purpose.

Qualified material use

Connect the intended action to reliable identity, provenance, maturity and applicable collection requirements.

  1. Does the source population or cultivated accession meet the receiving site's identity and provenance requirements? boundary
  2. What maturity evidence and collection permission are needed before retaining or transferring its seed? action

Control and outcome verification

Plan intervention around seed-release state and verify subsequent plant and recruitment outcomes.

Reproduction-aware control

Distinguish removing current plants from reducing future recruitment, and require local evidence for treatment selection.

  1. Given capsule maturity and the site's objective, what intervention can reduce further seed contribution while meeting local constraints? action
  2. What follow-up counts will test reproductive suppression and subsequent recruitment, including any suspected treatment resistance? measurement
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Kinds and varieties

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Papaver rhoeas this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.LIV

What it is Filled

Papaver rhoeas L. is an annual, hispid segetal poppy (Papaveraceae, sect. Rhoeadium) of disturbed and arable ground, native from Macaronesia and Europe through the Mediterranean to the western Himalaya, recognised by spreading peduncle hairs, a hairless turbinate-to-subglobose capsule less than twice as long as broad, and latex that yields rhoeadine-type alkaloids rather than morphine.

In scope

  • Identification from flowers, pedicel hairs, leaves and mature capsules, with explicit confidence
  • Development from seedling and rosette through flowering, capsule maturation and senescence
  • Plant condition and evidence of damage or reproductive failure
  • Local establishment, recruitment and seed-release observations
  • Decisions to retain, cultivate, collect, monitor or control identified plants

Out of scope

  • Other Papaver species and unresolved interspecific hybrids
  • Whole-field crop management and ecosystem condition
  • Soil properties and weather systems beyond their relationship to an occurrence
  • Food, medicinal preparations and extracted chemical products
  • Remembrance symbols, artworks and artificial poppies

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to recognise Papaver rhoeas, assess its life stage and reproductive state, and choose evidence-supported observation, cultivation, conservation or control actions.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Inspect hairs immediately below the flower: spreading hairs support P. rhoeas, whereas closely appressed upper pedicel hairs support P. dubium; combine this with mature fruit characters. [Botanical Society of Scotland](https://botsoc.scot/2020/06/19/papaver-rhoeas-and-papaver-dubium/)
  • Measure a mature capsule: the relatively broad capsule of P. rhoeas contrasts with the elongated capsule of P. dubium; record dimensions rather than relying on an immature fruit silhouette. [PlantNET identification key](https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?lvl=gn&name=Papaver&page=nswfl)
  • Inspect capsule surfaces under magnification: a hairless capsule supports P. rhoeas over the bristly capsules of P. argemone and P. hybridum. [PlantNET identification key](https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?lvl=gn&name=Papaver&page=nswfl)
  • Check stem-leaf attachment: shortly stalked leaves support P. rhoeas over the stem-clasping leaves used to identify P. somniferum in the regional key. [PlantNET identification key](https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?lvl=gn&name=Papaver&page=nswfl)
  • Treat red petals and dark basal blotches as supporting observations, not decisive tests: P. rhoeas can have pink or white petals and variable blotches. [Flora of New Zealand](https://www.nzflora.info/factsheet/taxon/Papaver-rhoeas.html)

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Recommend eating or preparing it as a remedy or sedative.
  • Mock or misuse the remembrance poppy symbol.
  • Confuse it with the opium poppy in claims about legality or effects.
  • Advise spraying wild plants on land the agent does not manage.

Only with a human decision

  • Treating field margins that hold wild poppies with herbicides.

May

  • Identify the common poppy and describe its ecology, citing botanical sources.
  • Describe its role as a symbol of remembrance with respect for that meaning.

Moral aspects Filled

  • The red poppy is a symbol of remembrance for war dead in many countries.
  • Arable wild flowers have declined sharply with intensive farming.

Who is affected

  • Families of war dead
  • Farmers
  • Pollinating insects

Owners Filled

Steward

Nobody: a wild plant; the landowner manages each field.

Master systems

  • Plant name databases

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q11992872 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.papaver-rhoeas
  • Wikidata: Q130201 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130201)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Identification status: unresolved Papaver; provisional P. rhoeas; confirmed against a named regional key; conflicting characters
  • Upper pedicel hair orientation: spreading; appressed; mixed; not observable
  • Mature capsule proportions: length and maximum width in mm; length-to-width ratio
  • Capsule surface: hairless; bristly; otherwise hairy; obscured
  • Stigmatic disc: ray count; disc width in mm; disc-to-capsule width ratio
  • Stem-leaf attachment: shortly petiolate; sessile non-clasping; clasping; uncertain
  • Developmental stages present: seedling; rosette; elongating stem; bud; open flower; immature capsule; mature capsule; senescent; dead; combinations allowed
  • Capsule release state: immature; mature but closed; pores open; release observed; empty; uncertain
  • Local abundance: plants and reproductive plants per stated survey area in m²
  • Plant condition: apparently vigorous; wilted; chlorotic; mechanically damaged; browsed; symptomatic; senescing; unknown
  • Occurrence origin: linked sowing record; documented seed source; spontaneous occurrence; unresolved origin
  • Recruitment evidence: linked seedling cohort, observation dates, survey area and preceding disturbance

Recognition required Filled

  • Bright scarlet flowers with four papery petals, often with a dark blotch at the base.
  • Hairy stems and a rounded seed capsule with a flat cap.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Document diagnostic organs and request expert determination when characters conflict.
  • Revisit marked plants to resolve identification using mature capsules.
  • Monitor emergence, flowering, capsule opening and subsequent recruitment.
  • Retain or cultivate plants when identity, provenance and the site objective support that action.
  • Collect attributable seed or voucher material when maturity, permission and the receiving collection's requirements are established.
  • Plan and assess targeted control using reproductive state, local objectives and verified management evidence.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • The plant contains alkaloids and can be harmful to livestock and people if eaten.
  • It is a weed of cereal crops where it competes with the harvest.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, International Association for Plant Taxonomy.

Context of use required Filled

  • Papaver rhoeas occurs in arable fields, field margins, roadsides and other disturbed ground.
  • It is encountered in botanical surveys, farmland vegetation management and ornamental wildflower plantings.
  • Its red flowers also feature in remembrance traditions and cultural representations of agricultural landscapes.

Sources Filled

  1. Papaver rhoeas L. - Accepted name, IPNI LSID, native range, habit, floral and capsule measurements, seed-bank longevity, uses as food/medicine/poison, and Kew species-profile description.
  2. Papaver rhoeas - North American treatment: height, petal colour including Shirley forms, stigma-ray count, capsule proportions, habitat, elevation, and introduced status.
  3. Papaver rhoeas - Common names, subspecies accepted by POWO, distinction from P. dubium by peduncle hairs and capsule shape, phytochemistry (rhoeadine), agricultural-weed ecology, Shirley cultivars, remembrance use, and pollen yield.
  4. Corn poppy, Papaver rhoeas L.: a critical review of its botany, phytochemistry and pharmacology - Traditional edible and medicinal uses, cosmopolitan weed status, and the Shirley/Flanders vernacular cluster.
  5. Category:Papaver rhoeas - Crosswalk of taxonomic identifiers (Wikidata, GBIF, ITIS, NCBI, EPPO, USDA PLANTS, Tropicos, iNaturalist).
  6. Papaver rhoeas L., Common poppy (World flora) - Use classes (ornamental, folklore medicine, mammalian poison, seed contaminant, dye) and links to GBIF, IPNI, POWO and EPPO.
  7. Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/2142 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of opium alkaloids in certain foodstuffs - Food-law maximum levels for morphine/codeine in poppy seed apply to Papaver somniferum, not to P. rhoeas.
  8. Update on Opium Alkaloids in Food: Exploring Their Occurrence, Effect of Culinary Processing and Advances in Analytical Methodologies - States that P. rhoeas does not synthesise opium alkaloids, and that labelled rhoeas seed has nonetheless been found contaminated via shared processing equipment.
  9. Wikidata item Q130201: Papaver rhoeas - identity and sense of the item

Open questions

  • Which regional flora and taxon treatment should govern identification, especially where P. dubium, atypical plants or cultivated forms produce conflicting characters?
  • What evidence can reliably identify detached seed and early seedlings as P. rhoeas in the intended operating region?
  • What local data establish emergence timing, dormancy, seed longevity and responses to disturbance without importing values from other climates?
  • Which local management methods are supported by field evidence, and is resistance relevant to the particular population?
  • For any proposed food, medicinal, livestock-contact or seed-transfer use, what species-specific evidence and jurisdictional requirements must the neighbouring use model establish?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q130201/spec.json