← Back to catalogue
Research draft

cognitive science

vr.tr.cognitive-science · INF.KNW

Let an agent describe cognitive science as a field, relay its subfields, methods and institutions, present major theories and debates with attribution, and distinguish the science from cognitive therapies and related clinical practices.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent describe cognitive science as a field, relay its subfields, methods and institutions, present major theories and debates with attribution, and distinguish the science from cognitive therapies and related clinical practices.

The interdisciplinary study of the mind and intelligence, drawing on psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, philosophy, computer science and anthropology to understand perception, memory, language, reasoning and learning in humans, animals and machines; cognitive science emerged in the 1950s with the cognitive revolution, includes subfields such as cognitive neuroscience and the cognitive science of religion, and informs education, artificial intelligence and clinical practice, while cognitive therapies listed as aliases are clinical applications rather than the science itself.

What it is for: Understanding the mind and intelligence.

It can be explain the field and its subfields; relay methods and institutions; present theories and debates with attribution; distinguish from clinical applications.

Distinguishing features

Interdisciplinary

Information-processing and embodied approaches

Human, animal and machine cognition

Applied fields

What it looks like

Not visible; a field found in departments, journals, laboratories and conferences.

Physical character

emergence: 1950s decade - cognitive revolution

How it is recognised

Interdisciplinary study of mind and intelligence

Psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, philosophy, computing, anthropology

Cognitive behavioural therapy is a clinical method, not the science

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms, among others

neuroscience

is a kind of - in registry terms, among others

philosophy of mind

studies - the subject

cognition

is related to - a sibling field

artificial intelligence

In practice

Families and kinds

cognitive psychology

cognitive neuroscience

computational cognitive science and AI

linguistics and philosophy of mind

cognitive anthropology and the cognitive science of religion

applied fields such as cognitive hearing science and education

clinical applications such as cognitive therapy, listed as aliases

Standards and regulation

Research ethics for human and animal studies

No regulation of the field itself

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting one paradigm as the field

Confusing science with therapy

Overstating findings from single studies

Also called

Internet-delivered cognitive therapycognitive hearing sciencecognitive neurosciencecognitive behavioral therapycognitive science of religioncognitive theory of inquiry teachingBayesian cognitive scienceembodied cognitive sciencedevelopmental cognitive neuroscienceCognitive neuroscience of dreamsrational emotive behavior therapycognitive therapysystematic desensitizationcognitive emotional behavioral therapyschema therapymetacognitive trainingaggression replacement trainingcognitive behavioral therapy for insomniacognitive processing therapyRational living therapycognitive reframingconstructivismgraduated exposure therapypost-rationalist cognitive therapy

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.cognitive-science

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Field What cognitive science is.

Definition.

Scope

Scope and disciplines.

Scope

Scope.

  1. What does cognitive science study, and which disciplines contribute? definition
  2. Is the question about the science or about a cognitive therapy? boundary

Methods

Methods.

Methods

Methods.

  1. What methods does cognitive science use, from experiments and imaging to modelling? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific subfield? action
Theory Theories and debates.

Attribution.

Paradigms

Paradigms.

Paradigms

Paradigms.

  1. What do symbolic, connectionist, embodied and Bayesian approaches claim, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

Debates

Debates.

Debates

Debates.

  1. What are the major debates, such as nativism versus empiricism and the nature of consciousness? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance
Apply Applications.

Application.

AI

Artificial intelligence.

AI

AI.

  1. How do cognitive science and artificial intelligence inform each other? provenance
  2. Which entry fits artificial intelligence? action

Education

Education and clinical.

Education

Education.

  1. How does cognitive science inform education and clinical practice, and how do therapies differ from the science? provenance
  2. Which entry fits cognitive behavioural therapy? action
Context History and institutions.

Context.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did cognitive science emerge from the cognitive revolution and develop since? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of psychology? action

Institutions

Institutions.

Institutions

Institutions.

  1. Where is cognitive science taught and published? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Should cognitive neuroscience be a separate primary entry?
  • How should research references be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming therapies and applied fields; should they be split off?