← Back to catalogue
Research draft

satyagraha

vr.tr.satyagraha · ACT.ACT

Enable an agent to recognise claimed instances of satyagraha, assess their fidelity to an explicitly attributed interpretation, and identify justified next actions without equating moral commitment with practical success.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read

Researched by: Codex

Purpose and description

Enable an agent to recognise claimed instances of satyagraha, assess their fidelity to an explicitly attributed interpretation, and identify justified next actions without equating moral commitment with practical success.

Satyagraha is Gandhi's ethical discipline and practice of nonviolent resistance, grounded in adherence to truth, refusal to injure opponents, and willingness to suffer rather than inflict suffering in seeking to overcome injustice.

It can be Compare a claimed instance against several attributed interpretations of satyagraha.; Record a grievance alongside evidence, counterclaims and conditions for revising demands.; Assess a proposed action against the instance's stated truthfulness, nonviolence and consent commitments.; Identify discrepancies between participant commitments and documented conduct.; Flag reasons to negotiate, suspend or reassess an action for human decision.; Evaluate concessions, relationships and participant costs separately from fidelity to principles..

Distinguishing features

Check for an attributed commitment to truth and nonviolence, rather than inferring satyagraha from the absence of weapons alone.

Check how participants treat opponents and respond to suffering; Gandhi's normative distinction rejects hatred and injury while locating sacrifice in the resister. [Satyagraha v. Passive Resistance](https://www.mkgandhi.org/satyagraha_safrica/13passive_resistance.php)

Check whether civil disobedience is a particular expression of the practice; breaking a law alone does not establish satyagraha. [The Practice of Satyagraha](https://www.mkgandhi.org/swmgandhi/chap03.php)

Distinguish self-identification, demonstrated conduct and conformity to a specified interpretation; the label alone does not settle classification.

Check whether participants actively contest a specified wrong; mere inactivity or acquiescence does not establish an instance.

Scope

+ Attributed definitions of satyagraha and criteria for recognising instances

+ Relationships among truth, nonviolence, self-discipline and resistance

+ Grievances, demands and treatment of opponents

+ Participant preparation, voluntary commitment and conduct

+ Selection, suspension and evaluation of actions claimed as satyagraha

- Gandhi's complete biography and intellectual system

- General theories of nonviolent action, pacifism and civil resistance

- Complete histories of particular independence movements or campaigns

- Legal determinations concerning protest or civil disobedience

- Medical management of fasting and other health conditions

Characteristics

Interpretive authority
Named author, practitioner or tradition linked to a dated source Makes classification criteria attributable and disagreements inspectable.
Claimed instance status
Self-described; externally attributed; disputed; insufficient evidence Separates use of the name from assessment of the practice.
Truth claim and revisability
Claim, supporting evidence, counterevidence and stated revision conditions Allows an agent to assess how conviction responds to correction.
Nonviolence commitment
Principled; conditional policy; mixed; unspecified, with attributed criteria Records differences in commitment without silently treating them as equivalent.
Opponent relationship
Addressed person or institution, contested conduct and available dialogue channel Distinguishes resistance to a wrong from hostility toward a person.
Participant voluntariness
Documented consent; contested consent; withdrawal constrained; unknown Tests whether claimed sacrifice is chosen by those bearing it.
Conduct incidents
Number of documented incidents by type, actor and observation period, with coverage limitations Supports conduct assessment without treating missing reports as proof of nonviolence.
Practice phase
Inquiry; preparation; negotiation; action; suspension; settlement; reassessment Locates decisions within an instance without prescribing a universal sequence.

Also called

Satyagraha movement in Goa

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 6 bundles · 11 layers · 15 findings · 25 questions.

Meaning and attribution Establish which conception of satyagraha governs an assessment.

The agent needs explicit interpretive criteria before accepting or rejecting a claimed instance.

Definitions and lineages

Locate definitions in their authorship and historical setting.

Attributed definition

Record the selected definition, its source and differences from alternative formulations.

  1. Who defines satyagraha here, in which text or practice, and at what date? provenance
  2. Which commitments does that definition make necessary, and which does it leave optional? definition

Instance boundaries

Distinguish the concept, a claimed enactment and related forms of resistance.

Classification evidence

Specify evidence needed to classify an action beyond its name or outward tactic.

  1. What distinguishes this instance from strategic nonviolent resistance, passive resistance or civil disobedience under the selected definition? boundary
  2. How should the agent represent disagreement between participants' self-description and external assessments? action
Truth and grievance Represent the wrong being contested and the discipline of examining one's own claim.

An agent must inspect the asserted truth without assuming that the claimant possesses it.

Wrong and demand

Connect allegations of injustice to evidence and requested remedies.

Contestable grievance

Record the alleged wrong, affected people, counterclaims and proposed remedy.

  1. What specific conduct or arrangement is alleged to be wrong, and what evidence supports or challenges that claim? provenance
  2. What remedy is requested, and how do those affected understand its adequacy? definition

Self-correction

Examine whether truth-seeking can change the resister's position.

Revisable conviction

Record procedures for hearing objections, acknowledging error and revising demands.

  1. What evidence or argument would participants accept as grounds to revise their account of the wrong? boundary
  2. How can an opponent's correction be considered and publicly acknowledged during the action? action
Nonviolence and sacrifice Examine treatment of opponents and allocation of the burdens of resistance.

Visible peacefulness cannot alone establish whether conduct meets the professed ethical commitments.

Opponent treatment

Assess conduct toward opponents against the interpretation being used.

Nonviolence in conduct

Record operational boundaries for injury, threats, humiliation and retaliation.

  1. How does the selected interpretation assess hostile speech, property damage and indirect harm? boundary
  2. What observed conduct supports or contradicts the stated commitment, and whose conduct is attributable to the instance? measurement

Voluntary burdens

Distinguish chosen sacrifice from costs imposed on others.

Sacrifice and pressure

Examine consent, unequal exposure and disputed boundaries between moral appeal and coercion.

  1. Who chooses the sacrifice, who actually bears its costs, and can participants decline or withdraw? measurement
  2. When do fasting or other forms of self-suffering become coercive under the interpretations being compared? boundary
Preparation and action Connect participant readiness with the selection and governance of resistance.

The model must support decisions about conduct rather than treating satyagraha as a label attached to a tactic.

Discipline and participation

Record the commitments and preparation expected of participants.

Readiness for restraint

Identify how an instance prepares participants to sustain its commitments under provocation.

  1. Which vows, training or practices are required here, and who established those requirements? provenance
  2. How are breaches addressed while preserving participants' ability to dissent or withdraw? action

Means and transitions

Assess particular actions and transitions against declared principles and circumstances.

Justified action selection

Record reasons for choosing dialogue, noncooperation, disobedience or constructive activity without assuming a fixed escalation ladder.

  1. Why is the proposed means appropriate to this grievance under the selected interpretation? action
  2. What conditions justify beginning, changing or suspending it, and who has authority to decide? action
Change and appraisal Examine how an instance seeks change and what its outcomes warrant concluding.

Moral fidelity, opponent persuasion and practical concessions require separate evidence.

Mechanisms of change

Distinguish intended moral influence from other possible explanations of change.

Appeal and leverage

Record competing explanations involving persuasion, public response, disrupted cooperation and institutional pressure.

  1. Whose understanding or behaviour is expected to change, and through what stated mechanism? definition
  2. What evidence would distinguish a change of conviction from tactical accommodation or unrelated developments? measurement

Settlement and integrity

Assess achieved remedies alongside conduct, burdens and unresolved disagreement.

Multidimensional outcome

Record practical results and ethical assessments without collapsing them into a single success score.

  1. Which demands were met, which burdens persisted, and how do participants, opponents and affected nonparticipants assess the result? measurement
  2. What unresolved wrongs or breaches of commitment require renewed inquiry, repair or continued suspension? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • This account is recalled knowledge, not a review of sources.
  • Researchers should distinguish Gandhi's formulations from later uses of the term for nonviolent protest generally.
  • Whether particular methods, especially fasting, satisfy satyagraha's rejection of coercion is contested; no formal taxonomy or standardized quantitative measure is asserted here.
  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • Gandhi-led resistance to discriminatory laws affecting Indians in South Africa.
  • The Champaran campaign concerning the treatment of indigo cultivators.
  • The Kheda campaign for suspension of land revenue collection during agricultural hardship.
  • The Salt Satyagraha challenging British colonial salt laws in India.
  • Training participants in disciplined nonviolent resistance and negotiation.
  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • Participants may face imprisonment, physical injury, loss of livelihood, or lethal repression.
  • Violence by participants can undermine the discipline and ethical basis of a campaign.
  • Treating satyagraha solely as a pressure tactic can obscure its commitments to truthfulness and regard for opponents.
  • Fasting can cause serious bodily harm and raises disputed questions about coercion.
  • Appeals to conscience may fail to change opponents' conduct or secure institutional reform.
  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • In South Africa, Gandhi developed the practice through struggles against discrimination affecting Indian communities.
  • In India, satyagraha became associated with agrarian campaigns and mass resistance to colonial rule.
  • International adaptations often overlap with broader nonviolent resistance traditions while differing in their acceptance of Gandhi's ethical and spiritual commitments.
  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • nonviolent resistance - Nonviolent resistance can be adopted for strategic reasons alone; satyagraha additionally entails ethical commitments to truth, non-injury, and voluntary suffering.
  • civil disobedience - Civil disobedience involves deliberate breach of law; satyagraha can include lawful action and does not require lawbreaking.
  • passive resistance - Gandhi distinguished satyagraha as active, principled resistance from resistance understood merely as a expedient available to those lacking physical power.
  • ahimsa - Ahimsa is the broader principle of non-injury; satyagraha applies nonviolence together with truth-seeking to resistance and conflict.
  • non-cooperation - Non-cooperation withdraws participation or support; it is one possible method within satyagraha and can also occur outside that ethical framework.
  • pacifism - Pacifism concerns opposition to war or violence; satyagraha specifies a practice of actively confronting injustice.
  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Which dated formulations by Gandhi and later practitioners establish materially different criteria for recognising satyagraha?
  • Can secular or primarily strategic adaptations retain the name under defensible criteria, and who accepts or rejects those criteria?
  • Where should the boundary between voluntary self-suffering and coercive pressure be drawn, especially for fasting and unequal participant relationships?
  • What relationship to constructive work is necessary for an instance, and when is it supplementary rather than constitutive?
  • How should mixed conduct within a mass campaign affect classification without attributing every participant's behaviour to the whole?