← Back to catalogue
Research draft

transcription

vr.tr.transcription-q207714 · ACT.PRC

Let an agent handle transcription by type, standard, accuracy and use, help people transcribe speech and names consistently, and separate biological and other senses.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent handle transcription by type, standard, accuracy and use, help people transcribe speech and names consistently, and separate biological and other senses.

The representation of speech or text in written form, either in the same script, as in orthographic or phonetic transcription of speech, or by rendering words from one writing system into another according to pronunciation, as in the transcription of Japanese or Ancient Egyptian names; it differs from transliteration, which maps characters, and from biological transcription of DNA.

What it is for: Recording speech, converting names between scripts and research.

It can be choose a transcription or romanisation standard; transcribe speech accurately; distinguish transcription and transliteration; separate biological and legal senses.

Distinguishing features

Represents speech or pronunciation

Follows standards or conventions

Can be broad or narrow

Many script pairs

What it looks like

Written text, phonetic symbols or romanised names derived from speech or other scripts.

How it is recognised

IPA or orthographic transcripts

Romanised names from other scripts

Transliteration maps letters rather than sounds

Related models

is a kind of - category

writing

is contrasted with - related process

transliteration

uses - notation

International Phonetic Alphabet

is confused with - another sense

transcription (biology)

In practice

Families and kinds

orthographic transcription of speech

phonetic and phonemic transcription

romanisation and cyrillisation systems

transcription of historical names

verbatim legal and medical transcripts

Standards and regulation

ISO and national romanisation standards

UN recommendations on romanisation of geographical names

Court transcript rules

Failure modes and hazards

Inconsistent spellings of names

Errors in automated transcripts

Privacy of recorded speech

Also called

orthographic transcriptionanglicisation of nameBS 4812:1972cyrillization of Malagasytranscription of Japanesetranscription of Ancient Egyptian Namescyrillization of Englishcyrillization of Chinese into Russiancyrillization of CantoneseGB/T 17693.4-2009romanization of North Koreanaudio transcriptiondifferent transcription of the same person's nameromanization of Modern GreekEnglish Romanization of JapaneseMinistry of Foreign Affairs RomanizationRoad Sign-style Hepburn Romanizationvoice writingphonemic transcriptionphonetic transcriptionTranscription of Australian Aboriginal languagestranscription into Japanesetone numbertranscription of Italian into Japanesetranscription of Ukrainian into Japanesetranscription of Catalan into Japanesetranscription of Spanish into Japanese

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.transcription-process

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Type Which transcription.

Types differ.

Speech

Transcribing speech.

Speech

Speech transcription.

  1. Is an orthographic, phonemic or phonetic transcription needed? definition
  2. How detailed should it be? boundary

Scripts

Between scripts.

Scripts

Between scripts.

  1. Which romanisation or transcription system applies to this language pair? provenance
  2. Is transliteration more suitable? boundary
Accuracy Quality.

Accuracy matters.

Check

Verifying.

Check

Checking transcripts.

  1. How accurate is this transcript, and how was it checked? measurement
  2. Were automated tools used? provenance

Names

Personal and place names.

Names

Names.

  1. How does the person or place officially spell the name in this script? provenance
  2. Which standard do official bodies use? provenance
Use Applications.

Uses need care.

Research

Interviews and corpora.

Research

Research transcription.

  1. Which conventions suit research interviews or corpora? provenance
  2. How is consent handled for recordings? boundary

Legal

Court and medical records.

Legal

Legal and medical transcripts.

  1. What rules apply to court or medical transcripts? provenance
  2. Who may access them? provenance
Senses Disambiguation.

Transcription has other senses.

Biology

DNA to RNA.

Biology

Biological sense.

  1. Is transcription of DNA into RNA meant? boundary
  2. Which entry fits? action

Music

Musical transcription.

Music

Musical sense.

  1. Is transcribing music by ear or arranging for another instrument meant? boundary
  2. Which entry fits? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should each romanisation system be a separate entry?
  • How should standards be linked?
  • How should the biological sense be split off?