cognition
Let an agent discuss cognition as a set of processes studied by cognitive science, give only general information on cognitive difficulties, and avoid inferring impairment.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent discuss cognition as a set of processes studied by cognitive science, give only general information on cognitive difficulties, and avoid inferring impairment.
The mental processes of acquiring, processing, storing and using information, including perception, attention, memory, language, reasoning and decision-making.
What it is for: Cognition is how people and animals know and think; understanding it informs education, design and health.
It can be study it, in cognitive science; assess it, with validated tests by professionals; support it, with accessible design; model it, computationally.
Distinguishing features
A family of mental processes
Studied across psychology, neuroscience, linguistics and computing
Distinct from emotion, though interacting
Cognitive difficulties need professional assessment
What it looks like
Not visible; inferred from behaviour, tests and brain measures.
How it is recognised
Performance on tasks and tests
Brain imaging correlates
Difficulties such as executive dysfunction are clinical concepts
Related models
is studied by - disciplines
includes - reasoning
is confused with - a measured construct
can be affected by - conditions
In practice
Families and kinds
perception and attention
memory
language
reasoning and problem-solving
executive functions
music cognition
Standards and regulation
Clinical guidelines for cognitive assessment
Accessibility standards for cognitive accessibility (W3C COGA)
Failure modes and hazards
Inferring cognitive impairment from casual interaction
Unvalidated brain-training claims
Inaccessible design for people with cognitive disabilities
Also called
+21
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Also registered as vr.tr.cognition
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Processes Which cognitive process.
Processes differ in how they work and fail.
Process
Memory, attention, reasoning.
Process
The process in question.
- Which cognitive process is involved? definition
- How does it interact with others? definition
Models
Theories.
Models
Theoretical models.
- Which model explains this process? provenance
- How well supported is it? measurement
Assessment Measuring cognition.
Assessment belongs to professionals with validated tools.
Tests
Validated instruments.
Tests
Tests and norms.
- Which validated test measures this, and for which population? provenance
- Who may administer it? boundary
Limits
What not to infer.
Inference limits
Limits for agents.
- Is an agent inferring impairment without evidence? boundary
- When should it suggest professional assessment? action
Support Design and help.
Good design supports different cognitive needs.
Design
Cognitive accessibility.
Design
Accessible design.
- Is the content understandable and predictable for people with cognitive disabilities? measurement
- Which guidelines apply? provenance
Interventions
Evidence-based support.
Interventions
Supported interventions.
- Which interventions have evidence? provenance
- Which claims lack evidence? boundary
Research Cognitive science.
Findings vary in robustness.
Findings
Robustness.
Findings
Robust findings.
- How robust is this finding? measurement
- Has it replicated? provenance
Computational models
AI and cognition.
Models
Computational analogies.
- How far do computational models explain this? boundary
- Where does the analogy fail? boundary
What the second pass must settle
- Should cognitive processes be separate entries?
- How should agents support users with cognitive disabilities?
- How should validated and unvalidated claims be marked?