semantic relation
Let an agent handle semantic relations by type, direction, formal properties and use in vocabularies and knowledge graphs.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions
Type Which relation.
Kind
Is-a, part-of.
Kind
Relation type.
- Which semantic relation holds between the two concepts? definition
- Is it at word or concept level? definition
Direction
Broader or narrower.
Direction
Direction.
- In which direction does the relation run? boundary
- Is it symmetric? definition
Logic Formal properties.
Properties
Transitivity.
Properties
Formal properties.
- Is the relation transitive, symmetric or reflexive? definition
- What inferences follow? definition
Consistency
Checks.
Consistency
Consistency.
- Does the relation create cycles or contradictions? boundary
- How is that checked? action
Mapping Between vocabularies.
Match
Exact or close.
Match
Mapping strength.
- Is this an exact, close, broad or narrow match? boundary
- Who reviewed it? provenance
Standard
SKOS.
Standard
Standards.
- Which SKOS or OWL property expresses it? definition
- Is it used consistently? boundary
Use Applications.
Search
Query expansion.
Search
Search.
- How can the relation improve search? action
- Could it introduce errors? boundary
Language
Words.
Language
Lexical relations.
- Does the relation hold across languages? boundary
- Which lexical database records it? provenance
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- Thing Registry
- Category
- Cross-cutting context
- Entry kind
- thing
- Plane
- XCT
- Domain
- XCT.REL
- Other names and narrower kinds
- inclusion relation, similarity-based relation, containment-based relation, direction-based relation, SKOS generic mapping relation
What it is Filled
A relation between meanings of words, concepts or entities, such as synonymy, hyponymy (is-a), meronymy (part-of), similarity and mapping relations used in thesauri, ontologies and knowledge graphs, including SKOS mapping relations.
Why it exists Filled
Let an agent handle semantic relations by type, direction, formal properties and use in vocabularies and knowledge graphs.
Distinguishing features Filled
- Relates meanings
- Directional or symmetric
- May be transitive
- Used in machine-readable vocabularies
What robots and AI may and may not do Filled
Must not
- Assert an is-a or part-of relation that sources do not support.
- Treat closely related terms as exact synonyms when merging datasets.
- Encode offensive or stigmatising relations between groups of people.
- Overwrite curated relations in a shared vocabulary without review.
Only with a human decision
- Changing relations in a shared ontology others depend on.
May
- Record and query semantic relations in vocabularies and ontologies the agent is authorized to edit.
- Explain the difference between synonymy, hyponymy and meronymy with examples.
Moral aspects Filled
- Wrong relations spread through linked data and search results.
- Classifications of people can embed prejudice.
Who is affected
- Users of linked data
- People and groups being classified
Owners Filled
Steward
Nobody: the concept is held in common; curators answer for each vocabulary.
Links to other meta-models Filled
parent
- Q130901 - registry parent class
related
- binary relation - category
- part (meronymy) - kind
- thesaurus and ontology - applications
- SKOS and OWL - standards
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Vercy registry: vr.tr.semantic-relation
- Wikidata: Q2268906 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2268906)
- SKOS property URI: skos:broader, skos:exactMatch mapping properties
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Plane XCT: no invented physical properties.
Recognition optional Filled
- Relation labels such as broader, narrower, part of
- SKOS properties such as exactMatch
- Word-level relations such as synonymy
- Links between terms in thesauri, ontologies and graphs.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- classify a relation between concepts
- map vocabularies with SKOS
- check direction and transitivity
- use relations for search and reasoning
Hazards and failure modes required Filled
- Confusing is-a with part-of
- Asserting exact matches that are only close
- Wrong direction of broader and narrower
Standards and interfaces required Filled
- W3C SKOS
- W3C OWL
- ISO 25964 thesauri
Context of use required Filled
- Organising meaning in dictionaries, thesauri, ontologies and search.
- synonymy and antonymy
- hyponymy and hypernymy
- meronymy (part-whole)
- similarity and association
- mapping relations such as SKOS exactMatch
Sources Filled
- Wikidata item Q2268906: semantic relation - identity and sense of the item
- Lexical semantics - Meaning relations between lexical items, including hypernymy, hyponymy, meronymy and holonymy.
Open questions
- Should each relation be a separate entry?
- How should registry relations map to SKOS?
- How should relation strength be recorded?
Machine files
Provenance
thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed
Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q2268906/spec.json