← Back to catalogue
Published

Sunnah

vr.tr.sunnah · thing-q234764

Enable an AI agent to recognise literature on Muhammad's deeds and sayings, assess its attribution, transmission and interpretation, and select justified retrieval, comparison, citation or presentation actions.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems INF.KNW

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 18 findings · 28 questions

Sunnah meaning and boundaries Identifies what the Sunnah claim denotes and the interpretive setting in which it is made.

Intended sense

Establishes the meaning of the term in the claim under review.

Sense of Sunnah

Record the intended meaning and any ambiguity that changes how the claim should be assessed.

  1. Does Sunnah here name an authoritative example, a transmitted practice, or the recommended status of an act? definition
  2. What surrounding wording or explicit definition establishes that sense? provenance

Tradition and claim boundary

Locates the claim within a named tradition and separates it from adjacent concepts.

Represented understanding

Record whose understanding is represented and exactly which example or practice is being claimed.

  1. Which community, school, scholar, or source identifies this example as Sunnah? provenance
  2. Which parts of the description are the claimed Sunnah, and which are accompanying custom, commentary, or legal inference? boundary
Example and transmission Connects the claimed Sunnah to its attributed exemplar and surviving evidence.

Attributed example

Specifies the conduct or expression from which the claim arises.

Example content

Record what was reportedly said, done, approved, or practised, with relevant circumstances.

  1. What precise speech, action, approval, or practice is attributed to which exemplar? definition
  2. Which details come directly from the evidence, and which were supplied by a later interpreter? provenance

Supporting witnesses

Identifies accessible evidence and meaningful differences among its forms.

Evidence path

Record identifiable supporting witnesses and their relationships without assuming that repetition provides independent corroboration.

  1. Which inspectable reports, passages, or accounts of transmitted practice support this attribution? provenance
  2. Do the witnesses differ in wording, conduct, circumstances, or transmission history in ways that affect the Sunnah claim? boundary
Evidential standing Represents assessments of the attribution and the limits of agreement about it.

Attribution evaluation

Keeps assessments attached to their precise evidential targets and methods.

Qualified assessment

Record an assessor's conclusion, rationale, and whether it concerns a particular report, transmission route, or broader practice.

  1. Who accepted, qualified, or rejected the attribution, and what reasons did they give? provenance
  2. Does that assessment apply to this exact witness or to a different version or broader claim? boundary

Disagreement and gaps

Captures competing assessments and missing evidence that constrain confident description.

Bounded confidence

State what the inspected evidence supports and which disagreements remain unresolved.

  1. Which consulted authorities disagree, and is the disagreement about attribution, evidential method, or the content being attributed? boundary
  2. What additional source or assessment must be inspected before the agent can strengthen its description? action
Normative interpretation Records the reasoning that connects an attributed example to its claimed religious significance.

Example to guidance

Makes the inference from reported example to normative guidance explicit.

Normative inference

Record why an interpreter treats the example as guidance and what force they assign to it.

  1. What reasoning treats this example as religious guidance rather than personal habit or a circumstance-specific act? definition
  2. What normative classification does the named interpreter assign, and where is that reasoning documented? provenance

Related evidence and readings

Records how the interpretation handles other relevant evidence and alternative readings.

Interpretive reconciliation

Preserve stated restrictions, reconciliations, or claims of supersession together with their evidential basis.

  1. Which other scriptural passages, reports, or practices are used to explain or limit this interpretation? provenance
  2. Are differing examples understood as permitted variation, contextual differences, contradiction, or supersession, and by whom? boundary
Situated application Determines how a qualified Sunnah claim may inform a concrete situation.

Applicability conditions

Identifies the circumstances and interpretive choices relevant to proposed enactment.

Context match

Record the conditions under which the named interpretation regards the practice as applicable.

  1. Which actor, purpose, circumstances, prerequisites, or exceptions determine whether this interpretation applies? boundary
  2. Does the interpretation require the reported form itself, its stated purpose, or both, and what evidence supports that distinction? provenance

Agent response

Connects evidential and interpretive limits to the response an agent can responsibly provide.

Qualified use

Specify whether the available record supports description, comparison, conditional guidance, or referral for further judgment.

  1. What can the agent explain or suggest while accurately naming the tradition, evidence, and unresolved qualifications? action
  2. Which unresolved contextual or interpretive issue requires further research or consultation before giving an application-specific answer? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Kinds and varieties

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Sunnah this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Information and virtual systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
INF
Domain
INF.KNW

What it is Filled

Sunnah, in this literary sense, is the body of literature reporting Muhammad's deeds and sayings, including accounts of his tacit approvals and personal attributes, whose transmission, authenticity and interpretation are assessed within differing Islamic scholarly traditions.

In scope

  • Criteria identifying a report, work or corpus as literature on Muhammad's deeds and sayings.
  • Reported speech, deeds, tacit approvals and personal attributes as subjects of the literature.
  • Relationships among reports, compilations, textual versions, translations and citations.
  • Transmission evidence and attributed scholarly assessments of authenticity.
  • Tradition-specific interpretation, reception and disagreements concerning the literature.

Out of scope

  • The Quran as a separately modelled scripture.
  • Individual hadith reports as independently catalogued transmission objects.
  • Complete systems of Islamic jurisprudence and their legal rulings.
  • Biographical identity records for religious figures and transmitters, while relevant biographical literature remains in scope.
  • Religious communities, schools, and institutions as organisational entities.
  • Individual worship events and personal compliance records.
  • Normative practice and religious authority as independent senses of Sunnah.

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to recognise literature on Muhammad's deeds and sayings, assess its attribution, transmission and interpretation, and select justified retrieval, comparison, citation or presentation actions.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • The referent is literature reporting Muhammad's deeds and sayings, rather than a practice or a juristic classification of an act as recommended.
  • A report's inclusion in the literature does not by itself establish its authenticity or normative authority.
  • A customary practice is not itself part of this literary corpus, although a textual account connecting it to Muhammad may be.
  • A legal ruling derived from the literature remains distinguishable from the reports and interpretations used to support it.
  • The model identifies whose assessment of a report or collection is represented rather than treating one community's assessment as universal.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Fabricate hadith or attribute sayings to the Prophet without a source.
  • Issue religious rulings in the agent's own voice.
  • Mock or disparage the Prophet, the Sunnah or Muslims.
  • Present one school's interpretation as the only valid one.

Only with a human decision

  • Giving religious guidance on a person's specific situation, which belongs to qualified scholars.

May

  • Describe literature on Muhammad's deeds and sayings, including its transmission, interpretation and reception in Islamic law and practice, with recognised sources.
  • Quote hadith collections with their source and grading where available.
  • Present differences between schools of thought fairly.

Moral aspects Filled

  • The Sunnah is sacred to Muslims, and fabricated attributions mislead believers.
  • Selective quotation has been used to justify violence or prejudice.

Who is affected

  • Muslims
  • Religious scholars
  • People subject to religious rulings

Owners Filled

Steward

Nobody owns it; Muslim communities and their scholars hold the tradition.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q2640329 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.sunnah
  • Wikidata: Q234764 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q234764)

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

  • Intended sense of Sunnah: Normative example; inherited practice; recommended-act classification; another explicitly defined sense; unresolved
  • Attributed exemplar: Named person or authoritative example, with the attributing tradition and its stated basis
  • Expression of the example: Speech; action; reported approval; transmitted practice; combination; disputed
  • Evidence basis: Identifiable reports, textual passages, accounts of practice, and scholarly assessments supporting or challenging the claim
  • Attribution assessment: Unassessed; accepted by a named assessor; qualified; disputed; rejected by a named assessor
  • Normative force: Recorded classification under a named interpretive framework; disputed; unspecified
  • Application conditions: Relevant actors, circumstances, purposes, prerequisites, exceptions, and exclusions
  • Interpretive agreement: Not assessed; agreement within a specified set of authorities; disagreement within a tradition; disagreement across traditions

Plane INF: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • Cited through hadith reports with chains of narrators.
  • Collected in compilations such as those of al-Bukhari and Muslim.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Disambiguate a use of the word Sunnah before interpreting its implications.
  • Trace a claimed practice to inspectable evidence and named assessments.
  • Compare interpretations while preserving their traditions, premises, and disagreements.
  • Separate confidence in attribution from confidence in normative interpretation.
  • Assess whether stated application conditions match a proposed situation.
  • Produce a qualified explanation or refer an unresolved application question to an appropriate religious authority.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Attributing an unsupported report to the Prophet can spread religious misinformation.
  • Equating every reported action with a universal obligation can misrepresent scholarly interpretation.
  • Presenting one tradition's assessment as unanimous can distort religious differences and contribute to exclusion.

Standards and interfaces not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

No universal technical standard or civil regulation establishes the authenticity or normative authority of Sunnah across Islamic traditions.

Context of use required Filled

  • The Sunnah is encountered in Islamic scholarship, worship, ethics and discussions of religious law.
  • Reports of the Prophet Muhammad's words and actions provide evidence used in identifying and interpreting this normative practice.
  • Assessment depends on the identified tradition, the standing of the reports and their interpretation.

Sources Filled

  1. Sunnah - Core definition as Muhammad's example; role as second source of law; distinction from Qur'an
  2. Q 5:32 - Wikidata identifier Q234869; aliases; related items for hadith and fiqh
  3. Sunnah and Hadith - Scholarly distinction of kinds (qawliyyah, fi'liyyah, taqririyyah); sunnah vs hadith as vehicle vs content; living practice of Medina
  4. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence - Legal status of sunnah in usul al-fiqh; mu'akkadah/ghayr mu'akkadah; regional school differences
  5. Wikidata item Q234764: Sunnah - identity and sense of the item
  6. Wikipedia: Sunnah - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Does the registry intend Sunnah primarily as normative example, transmitted practice, a juristic classification, or all these senses within one model?
  • Which traditions must the model represent, and how does each delimit the exemplars and evidence authoritative for Sunnah?
  • How should continuity of communal practice be assessed when its evidential role differs from that of individually transmitted reports?
  • Which tradition-specific assessment terms can be compared without implying equivalence between distinct methods?
  • Where should this model hand an application question to a jurisprudence or religious-authority model rather than treating it as settled by attribution alone?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q234764/spec.json