← Back to catalogue
Research draft

word order

vr.tr.word-order · XCT.QLT

Let an agent explain word order and its typology, relay the basic orders, their distribution and correlations from linguistic sources with attribution, describe language-specific patterns such as English, Dutch and Esperanto, and distinguish word order from morphology, information structure and syntax in general.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain word order and its typology, relay the basic orders, their distribution and correlations from linguistic sources with attribution, describe language-specific patterns such as English, Dutch and Esperanto, and distinguish word order from morphology, information structure and syntax in general.

The arrangement of words and constituents in a sentence, studied in linguistic typology by the relative order of subject, verb and object, with English and most European languages using subject-verb-object, many others verb-final or verb-initial, rare verb-subject-object and object-subject-verb orders, constructed languages such as Esperanto allowing free order, and language-specific rules such as the placement of finite and infinite verbs in Dutch; word order also covers phenomena such as tmesis, the splitting of a compound by other words.

What it is for: Not applicable; a grammatical property.

It can be explain the concept and typology; relay distribution and correlations; describe specific languages; distinguish related concepts.

Distinguishing features

Typological parameter

Six basic orders

Correlations with other features

Language-specific rules

What it looks like

Not a visible object; the sequence of words in sentences.

Physical character

SOV languages: about 41 percent - WALS

SVO languages: about 35 percent - WALS

OSV languages: very rare, under 1 percent

Greenberg universals: 1963 year

How it is recognised

Arrangement of subject, verb and object

SVO, SOV, VSO, VOS, OVS, OSV; English, Dutch verb placement, Esperanto free order, tmesis

Morphology concerns word forms; information structure concerns topic and focus; syntax is the whole system

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

grammatical construction

is studied in - as a parameter

linguistic typology

is described by - in correlations

Greenberg s linguistic universals

is contrasted with - the form of words

morphology

In practice

Families and kinds

SOV languages such as Japanese and Turkish

SVO languages such as English and Mandarin

VSO languages such as Irish and Classical Arabic

VOS, OVS and OSV languages

free and flexible word order languages including Esperanto

specific phenomena such as Dutch verb placement and tmesis

Standards and regulation

No regulation; WALS and typological databases as reference

Failure modes and hazards

Treating one order as the norm

Confusing dominant order with rigid order

Registry aliases mixing orders, languages and a rhetorical figure

Also called

word order in Englishobject–subject–verbverb–subject–objecttmesisEsperanto word orderWord order of finite and infinite verb in Dutchverb-initial word orderCzech word ordersubject–object–verbLatin word orderverb–object–subjectsubject–verb–objectadjective-nounnoun-adjectiveobject–verb–subject

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What word order is.

Science.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is word order, and how does it differ from morphology, information structure and syntax in general? definition
  2. Is the question about typology, a specific language or a specific phenomenon? boundary

Orders

The basic orders.

Orders

Orders.

  1. What are SVO, SOV, VSO, VOS, OVS and OSV, and how common is each? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific order? action
Typology Typology.

Attribution.

Correlations

Correlations.

Correlations

Correlations.

  1. How does basic order correlate with adpositions, adjectives and other features, as Greenberg and later typologists describe? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Flexibility

Flexibility.

Flexibility

Flexibility.

  1. How do case marking and information structure allow flexible order in languages such as Latin, Russian and Esperanto? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Languages Specific languages.

Sources.

English

English and Dutch.

English

English.

  1. How does word order work in English, and what are the Dutch rules for finite and infinite verbs? provenance
  2. Which entry fits English grammar? action

Phenomena

Phenomena.

Phenomena

Phenomena.

  1. What is tmesis, and what other word order phenomena such as inversion and scrambling exist? provenance
  2. Which entry fits tmesis? action
Context Change and acquisition.

Context.

Change

Historical change.

Change

Change.

  1. How does word order change over time, as in the shift from Old to Modern English? provenance
  2. Which entry fits syntactic change? action

Acquisition

Acquisition and processing.

Acquisition

Acquisition.

  1. How do children acquire word order, and how does it affect processing? provenance
  2. Which entry fits language acquisition? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should the six basic orders be separate entries?
  • How should typological databases be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming specific orders, languages and tmesis; should they be split off?