← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Japonic

vr.tr.japonic · INF.MED

Let an agent explain the Japonic language family and its history, relay classification, stages and debates from linguistic sources with attribution, describe the Ryukyuan languages and their status, and distinguish Japonic from Korean, Ainu and the Altaic hypothesis.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain the Japonic language family and its history, relay classification, stages and debates from linguistic sources with attribution, describe the Ryukyuan languages and their status, and distinguish Japonic from Korean, Ainu and the Altaic hypothesis.

A language family comprising Japanese and the Ryukyuan languages of the Ryukyu Islands, descended from Proto-Japonic and attested through Old Japanese, Early and Late Middle Japanese to the modern language, with debated links to the peninsular Japonic languages once spoken in Korea and to the language of the ancient polity of Yamatai; Japonic is generally treated as an independent family, though proposed relations to Korean and Altaic remain unproven, and its insular branch is threatened by the endangerment of Ryukyuan languages.

What it is for: Not applicable; a language family.

It can be explain classification; relay stages and debates; describe Ryukyuan status; distinguish from other families.

Distinguishing features

Japanese and Ryukyuan

Proto-Japonic reconstruction

Historical stages

Independent family

What it looks like

Not a visible object; Japanese and Ryukyuan languages.

Physical character

speakers: about 125 million - mostly Japanese

Ryukyuan languages: 5 to 6 count - UNESCO endangered

Old Japanese attested: 8th century period - Kojiki and Man yoshu

How it is recognised

Family of Japanese and Ryukyuan

Proto-Japonic, Old Japanese, Early and Late Middle Japanese, Insular Japonic, Ryukyuan, peninsular Japonic

Korean is a separate family; Ainu is unrelated; the Altaic grouping is disputed

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms, as a family

human language

includes - as its largest member

Japanese language

includes - as the other branch

Ryukyuan languages

is debated in relation to - with no accepted link

Korean language

In practice

Families and kinds

Japanese including Old, Early Middle, Late Middle and Modern Japanese

Ryukyuan languages such as Amami, Okinawan, Miyako, Yaeyama and Yonaguni

Insular Japonic as the surviving branch

peninsular Japonic as a hypothesised extinct branch

Hachijo as a possible separate branch

the language of Yamatai as a historical question

Identifiers

Glottolog japo1237 Japonic

ISO 639-5 jpx Japanese languages

Standards and regulation

Japanese language policy and recognition of Ryukyuan languages

UNESCO endangered language listings

ISO 639 codes

Failure modes and hazards

Treating Ryukyuan as dialects rather than languages, which is debated

Presenting Altaic or Korean links as settled

Speculation about Yamatai s language presented as fact

Also called

Insular JaponicLate Middle JapaneseEarly Middle JapaneseYamataiProto-JaponicRyukyuanOld JapaneseKyowa-goPeninsular JaponicOld Japanese written in hiraganaOld Japanese written in kanjiSouthern RyukyuanNorthern RyukyuanProto-RyukyuanKyushu Old JapaneseEastern Old Japanesepseudo-GoguryeoMacro-Yaeyama languagesOld OkinawanOkinoerabu–Yoron–Northern OkinawanSouthern Amami-Okinawan

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What Japonic is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition and classification.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is the Japonic family, and how are Japanese and Ryukyuan related, as linguists classify them? definition
  2. Is the question about the family, Japanese, Ryukyuan, or a disputed external relation? boundary

Stages

Historical stages.

Stages

Stages.

  1. What are Proto-Japonic, Old Japanese and Early and Late Middle Japanese? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific stage? action
History History and debates.

Attribution.

Origins

Origins.

Origins

Origins.

  1. Where did Japonic originate, what is peninsular Japonic, and what is known about the language of Yamatai, with hypotheses attributed? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

External

External relations.

External

External.

  1. What do proposals linking Japonic to Korean, Altaic or Austronesian claim, and why are they unproven, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation attributed and cautious? boundary
Ryukyuan Ryukyuan languages.

Attribution.

Languages

Languages.

Languages

Languages.

  1. What are the Ryukyuan languages, and how do they differ from Japanese? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance

Status

Status and revitalisation.

Status

Status.

  1. How endangered are Ryukyuan languages, and what revitalisation efforts exist, with positions on language versus dialect attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Ryukyuan languages? action
Context Culture and study.

Context.

Literature

Literature.

Literature

Literature.

  1. What literary traditions exist in Japanese and Ryukyuan? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Japanese literature? action

Study

Study.

Study

Study.

  1. How is Japonic studied, and what resources exist? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Japanese linguistics? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should Ryukyuan languages and Old Japanese be separate primary entries?
  • How should linguistic sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming stages, branches and a historical polity; should they be split off?