← Back to catalogue
Research draft

disaster

vr.tr.disaster · XCT.STA

Let an agent handle disasters of all causes by type, impact and response, with verified information first.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent handle disasters of all causes by type, impact and response, with verified information first.

A serious disruption of the functioning of a community or society causing widespread human, material, economic or environmental losses that exceed its ability to cope, from natural, technological or human causes.

What it is for: Disasters are managed through preparedness, response and recovery.

It can be prepare and reduce risk; respond and coordinate aid; investigate causes; recover and learn.

Distinguishing features

Exceeds local coping capacity

Natural, technological or human causes

Includes slow-onset crises such as famine

Natural disaster is a subset

What it looks like

Damage, casualties, displaced people and emergency response; famines and crises may be less visible but deadly.

How it is recognised

Official declarations of disaster or emergency

Disaster databases and ids

Types such as industrial, stadium or engineering disasters

Related models

has kind - kinds

natural disaster, explosion, conflagration, flood

results from - with exposure and vulnerability

hazard

is managed by - field

disaster risk reduction

produces - impacts

consequence

In practice

Families and kinds

natural disasters

technological and industrial disasters

crowd disasters and crushes

humanitarian crises and famines

engineering failures

Identifiers

GLIDE number event code disasters

EM-DAT id numeric database

Standards and regulation

Sendai Framework

Civil protection law

Sphere humanitarian standards

Failure modes and hazards

Misinformation

Aid scams

Blaming victims

Neglect of slow-onset disasters

Also called

humanitarian crisisengineering disasterindustrial disastercrowd collapses and crushesstadium disasterfaminecomplex emergencyTelangana chemical factory explosionGarbage landslidedam failureclimbing disasterCompound disastersecondary disasterhealth catastrophemanmade disasterspace catastrophemajor disasteramusement park accidentwaterloggingcataclysmmining accidentclimate catastrophetragedycultural disasterbiological disastermaritime disasterenvironmental disastermass killingtunnel disastercrowd crush1993 rice shortage in Japanfamine in TibetFamines in Ethiopianuclear disastertailings dam failurerock burstroof-fall accidentmaritime disasters in Gipuzkoablown off course

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.disaster

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Event What happened.

Facts first.

Type and cause

Classification.

Type

Type of disaster.

  1. What type of disaster is it, and what caused it? provenance
  2. Where and when? provenance

Scale

Extent.

Scale

Scale of impact.

  1. How many people are affected, according to official sources? measurement
  2. How uncertain are the figures? measurement
Response Help now.

Official channels coordinate response.

Instructions

What to do.

Instructions

Official instructions.

  1. What do authorities advise people to do? action
  2. Where are shelters and help? action

Aid

Humanitarian response.

Aid

Response organisations.

  1. Which organisations are responding? provenance
  2. How can people help safely? action
Causes Why it happened.

Causes guide prevention.

Investigation

Inquiry findings.

Findings

Investigation findings.

  1. What did investigations find? provenance
  2. Who was responsible, if anyone? provenance

Vulnerability

Why losses were high.

Vulnerability

Vulnerability factors.

  1. What made people vulnerable? definition
  2. How can that be reduced? action
Recovery After the disaster.

Recovery should reduce future risk.

Rebuilding

Reconstruction.

Recovery

Recovery progress.

  1. How is recovery progressing? measurement
  2. Who funds it? provenance

Lessons

Changes.

Lessons

Lessons learned.

  1. Which lessons were implemented? provenance
  2. Which were not? boundary

What the second pass must settle

  • Should technological and natural disasters be linked under one parent?
  • How should agents verify live information?
  • How should famines be modelled?