milarite

Label resolution

Record what the original identification actually names and the evidence supporting that interpretation.

1. Does the original record identify milarite as a species, a milarite-group mineral or an uncertain visual identification? definition
2. What original label or analytical record rules out a transcription error involving millerite? provenance

Convergent species evidence

Require compatible observations and retain plausible competing identifications.

1. Which authenticated diffraction reference matches the examined phase, and which peaks remain unexplained? measurement
2. Does chemistry from that same phase support milarite rather than another mineral with a related structure? boundary
3. What additional observation would distinguish the remaining candidate minerals? action

Measured versus calculated composition

Keep direct analyses distinct from inferred occupancies; a published milarite investigation estimated Be from charge balance rather than measuring it. [Janeczek, 1986](https://rruff.geo.arizona.edu/doclib/MinMag/Volume_50/50-356-271.pdf)

1. Which of K, Ca, Be, Al, Si and minor constituents were directly measured, using what methods and detection limits? measurement
2. Which normalization, charge-balance or site-occupancy assumptions produced the reported formula? provenance

Specimen hydration evidence

Treat the water coefficient as a supported specimen property or an explicitly identified reference convention.

1. What measurement distinguishes structurally associated water from surface moisture or hydrous inclusions? measurement
2. Was the reported water coefficient measured on this specimen or adopted from a reference formula? provenance
3. Do spatially resolved analyses reveal differences that a bulk formula would conceal? measurement

Structural reference fit

Preserve the actual indexed pattern, cell parameters and uncertainty behind a structural assignment.

1. What cell parameters and symmetry are supported by the measured diffraction data? measurement
2. Were the specimen and reference examined at comparable temperatures and hydration states? boundary

Optical anomaly interpretation

Record sector boundaries and optical anomalies while leaving their mechanism open when evidence is insufficient.

1. What refractive indices, birefringence and optic axial angles were observed at the stated wavelength and orientation? measurement
2. Do anomalous optical regions coincide with chemical variation, growth sectors, cracks or inclusions? measurement
3. What evidence would distinguish strain-related behaviour from a separate mineral phase? boundary

Occurrence evidence

Separate documented field context from dealer attribution and later geological interpretation.

1. What field, collection or publication record connects this specimen to its claimed locality and host material? provenance
2. Which observed contacts or overgrowths constrain the crystallization sequence involving milarite? measurement

Representative analysis volume

Identify whether an observation represents milarite, an inclusion or a mixed analytical volume.

1. Which inclusions, coatings and matrix phases intersect the analyzed area or volume? boundary
2. What milarite phase fraction is supported, and is it expressed by mass or volume? measurement
3. Where can a representative milarite measurement be made with acceptable specimen loss? action

Intervention compatibility

Judge proposed treatments against the specimen's cracks, inclusions, mounts and research value.

1. What fractures, surface alterations, adhesives or previous cleaning treatments are documented? measurement
2. What milarite-specific evidence supports the proposed cleaning agent or heating conditions? action
3. Which observations must be recorded before treatment could alter hydration, optics or surface evidence? action

Operation-specific handling basis

Require a documented basis for preparation decisions, distinguishing intact specimens from generated particulate material.

1. Will the proposed operation create airborne particles, liquid residues or chemically transformed Be-bearing material? action
2. Which verified assessment covers this material form, process and jurisdiction? provenance
3. Can the identification objective be met with an intact-specimen method before cutting or pulverization is considered? action

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of milarite this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of milarite this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of milarite this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of milarite this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of milarite this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of milarite this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance