← Back to catalogue
Research draft

encyclopedia

vr.tr.encyclopedia · INF.MED

Let an agent explain encyclopedias and how to use and evaluate them, distinguish editorial from collaborative works, and support research and citation practice.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain encyclopedias and how to use and evaluate them, distinguish editorial from collaborative works, and support research and citation practice.

A reference work providing summaries of knowledge across all subjects or a particular field, arranged alphabetically or thematically, in print, on disc or online, from general encyclopedias and specialist works to collaborative wikis such as Wikipedia, Vikidia and fan wikis; encyclopedias are tertiary sources that summarise primary and secondary literature.

What it is for: Summarising and accessing knowledge.

It can be find suitable encyclopedias for a topic; evaluate reliability and editorial process; cite encyclopedia entries correctly; explain how collaborative encyclopedias work.

Distinguishing features

Tertiary source

Broad or specialist scope

Editorial or collaborative

Regularly revised

What it looks like

Multi-volume books, discs or websites with articles.

How it is recognised

Alphabetical or thematic articles

Editorial or community authorship

Dictionaries define words rather than summarise topics

Related models

is a kind of - category

reference work

is a kind of - category

tertiary source

is studied by - field

information science

is related to - access

library

In practice

Families and kinds

general encyclopedias

specialist encyclopedias

collaborative online encyclopedias

fan and community wikis

historical encyclopedias

Standards and regulation

Citation style guides

Editorial policies of encyclopedias

Licensing such as Creative Commons for collaborative works

Failure modes and hazards

Treating encyclopedias as primary sources

Vandalism and errors in open wikis

Outdated print editions

Also called

CD-ROM encyclopediaFandom wikiLiquipedia wikiVikidia editiononline encyclopediaFandom wiki moved to Mirahezethis wiki has been closedarchived Fandom wikiFantendoThe English fandom wiki at this URL has been closedFandom central wikiWeb Encyclopedia of KyivQueer-Lexikon.netpolitical online encyclopediaGran Enciclopèdia de la Músicaencyclopedic reference bookSupplement zu dem Baselischen allgemeinen Historischen Lexicomusic encyclopediabibliographical dictionarybiographical dictionaryencyclopedic dictionaryopen encyclopediaphilosophy encyclopediaEncyclopedias of BulgariaAoyama's Textbook of Internal Medicinenational encyclopediavideo encyclopediaAl-Mawsūʻah Al-shāmilah Fī Tārīkh Al-Ḥurūb Al-Ṣalībīyahhypertext encyclopediaspecialized encyclopediaTürk meşhurları ansiklopedisiSumma ArtisUzeyir Hajibeyov Encyclopediauniversal encyclopediaencyclopedia of literatureencyclopedia of misconceptionsGreat Encyclopaedia of Navarremedical encyclopediaHistoire philosophique et politique des établissements et du commerce des Européens dans les deux Indeslinguistic encyclopedia

+16

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Source repository Registry entry point

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Use Finding information.

Start, do not end, here.

Find

Which encyclopedia.

Find

Choosing.

  1. Which encyclopedia suits this topic and audience? action
  2. Is a specialist work available? provenance

Research

Role in research.

Research

Research.

  1. How should an encyclopedia entry be used as a starting point for research? action
  2. Which primary sources does it cite? provenance
Evaluate Reliability.

Check the process.

Editorial

Editorial process.

Editorial

Editorial process.

  1. Who writes and reviews entries, and how are errors corrected? provenance
  2. How current is the entry? provenance

Wiki

Collaborative works.

Wiki

Collaborative works.

  1. How reliable is this wiki entry, based on sourcing, history and community standards? boundary
  2. Which policies govern it? provenance
Cite Citation.

Cite properly.

Format

Citing entries.

Format

Citing.

  1. How should this encyclopedia entry be cited in the required style? action
  2. Should the version or access date be included? boundary

Appropriate

When to cite.

Appropriate

When to cite.

  1. Is citing an encyclopedia appropriate for this academic work? boundary
  2. Which sources should be cited instead? action
History Development.

From print to wikis.

Print

Historical encyclopedias.

Print

History.

  1. How did encyclopedias develop, from early compendia to the Encyclopedie and modern works? provenance
  2. Which are landmarks? provenance

Digital

Digital transition.

Digital

Digital transition.

  1. How did CD-ROM and online encyclopedias change the field? provenance
  2. How are wiki communities governed and hosted? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Should each major encyclopedia be a separate entry?
  • How should reliability assessments be linked?
  • How should wiki communities be described?
Draft as JSON