← Back to catalogue
Research draft

accessibility

vr.tr.accessibility · XCT.QLT

Let an agent explain accessibility and its domains, relay standards, laws and practices from accessibility and disability sources with attribution, describe the specific domains the registry aliases name, and distinguish accessibility from usability, inclusion in general and assistive technology.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain accessibility and its domains, relay standards, laws and practices from accessibility and disability sources with attribution, describe the specific domains the registry aliases name, and distinguish accessibility from usability, inclusion in general and assistive technology.

The design of products, environments, services and information so that people with disabilities and diverse abilities can use them, including architectural accessibility of buildings and transport, digital and software accessibility of websites and apps, cognitive accessibility, accessibility for people with visual disabilities, and digital inclusion more broadly, with national frameworks such as those for disabled people in France; accessibility is a legal requirement in many jurisdictions and a principle of universal design.

What it is for: Enabling use by people with disabilities and diverse abilities.

It can be explain domains; relay standards and laws; describe practices; distinguish related concepts.

Distinguishing features

Disability focus

Legal requirement

Physical and digital

Universal design

What it looks like

Not a visible object; ramps, captions, screen reader support.

Physical character

WCAG 2.2: 2023 year

people with disabilities worldwide: about 1.3 billion - WHO

Americans with Disabilities Act: 1990 year

European Accessibility Act applies: 2025 year

How it is recognised

Usability by people with disabilities

Architectural, digital, software, cognitive and visual accessibility; digital inclusion; accessibility in France

Usability is ease of use for all; inclusion is broader participation; assistive technology is the tools

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

usability

is a kind of - in registry terms

access

is standardised by - for digital content

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines

is required by - in many countries

disability rights law

In practice

Families and kinds

architectural and built environment accessibility

transport accessibility

digital and web accessibility including software

cognitive accessibility

accessibility for visual, hearing and motor disabilities

digital inclusion and national frameworks such as France s

Standards and regulation

WCAG and EN 301 549

Americans with Disabilities Act and European Accessibility Act

UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

National building accessibility codes

Failure modes and hazards

Treating accessibility as an afterthought

Confusing accessibility with usability

Registry aliases mixing domains and a national context

Also called

architectural accessibilitycognitive accessibilitydigital inclusiondisabled people accessibility in Franceaccessibility for people with visual disabilitiessoftware accessibilityinformation accessibilitylinguistic accessibilitywheelchair accessibilityaccessible imagegame accessibilityhealth services accessibilityweb accessibilityblind-friendly web

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What accessibility is.

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is accessibility, and how does it differ from usability, inclusion and assistive technology? definition
  2. Is the question about the concept, a domain, a law or a specific product? boundary

Domains

Domains.

Domains

Domains.

  1. What are architectural, transport, digital, software, cognitive and visual accessibility and digital inclusion? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific domain? action
Standards Standards and law.

Regulation.

Digital

Digital standards.

Digital

Digital.

  1. What do WCAG and EN 301 549 require, and how is conformance assessed? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Law

Laws.

Law

Law.

  1. What do the ADA, the European Accessibility Act, French law and the UN Convention require? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Practice Practice.

Practice.

Design

Designing for accessibility.

Design

Design.

  1. How are buildings, websites and software designed and tested for accessibility? action
  2. Which entry fits universal design? action

Assistive

Assistive technology.

Assistive

Assistive.

  1. How do screen readers, captions and other assistive technologies interact with accessible design? provenance
  2. Which entry fits assistive technology? action
Context Movement and debate.

Context.

Movement

Disability rights.

Movement

Movement.

  1. How did the disability rights movement establish accessibility as a right? provenance
  2. Which entry fits disability rights movement? action

Debates

Debates.

Debates

Debates.

  1. What debates exist about costs, enforcement and AI accessibility, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

What the second pass must settle

  • Should web accessibility, architectural accessibility and cognitive accessibility be separate primary entries?
  • How should standards and law sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming domains and a national situation; should they be split off?