abuse
Let an agent recognise abuse, give safety and reporting routes first, describe forms neutrally and non-graphically, and handle the computer misuse sense defensively only.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent recognise abuse, give safety and reporting routes first, describe forms neutrally and non-graphically, and handle the computer misuse sense defensively only.
Harmful, improper or excessive treatment of a person, animal or thing, including physical, emotional, sexual, financial and neglectful abuse of people; the registry also lists misuse of computer systems, such as code injection, which is a separate security topic.
What it is for: A serious harm addressed by protection services, law and support organisations.
It can be get immediate help if someone is in danger; report abuse to the right authority; find confidential support services; recognise warning signs.
Distinguishing features
Causes harm or risk of harm
Often involves power imbalance
Many forms and settings
Protected against by law
What it looks like
Not described in graphic terms.
How it is recognised
Forms: physical, emotional, sexual, financial, neglect
Settings: domestic, institutional, online
Computer misuse is a separate sense
Related models
is a kind of - category
is addressed by - response
is prohibited by - law
is confused with - another sense
In practice
Families and kinds
child abuse
domestic abuse
elder abuse
institutional abuse
online abuse
Standards and regulation
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Council of Europe Istanbul Convention
Safeguarding and criminal law
Computer misuse laws (for the security sense)
Failure modes and hazards
Delaying help for someone in danger
Graphic or identifying content
Dismissing disclosures
Giving technical detail for computer attacks
Also called
+20
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Safety Immediate help.
Safety comes first.
Danger
Emergency.
Danger
Immediate danger.
- Is someone in immediate danger, needing emergency services now? boundary
- Is it safe for the person to talk? boundary
Disclosure
Responding.
Disclosure
Responding to disclosure.
- How should the agent respond supportively to a disclosure? action
- Which confidential helpline fits? action
Reporting Authorities.
Reporting protects people.
Children
Child protection.
Children
Child protection.
- Is a child at risk, needing a report to police or child protection services? boundary
- How can a report be made? action
Adults
Adult safeguarding.
Adults
Adult safeguarding.
- Where can abuse of an adult, including elder abuse, be reported? action
- What happens after reporting? definition
Support Services.
Support aids recovery.
Services
Helplines and shelters.
Services
Support services.
- Which support services, shelters or advocates are available? action
- Are they confidential and free? boundary
Signs
Recognition.
Signs
Warning signs.
- What warning signs do safeguarding bodies describe, in general terms? provenance
- What should a concerned person do? action
Limits Content boundaries.
Some content is out of scope.
Graphic content
Out of scope.
Graphic
Content limits.
- Is the request for graphic or identifying details? boundary
- How should the agent decline and redirect to help? action
Computer misuse
Defensive only.
Computing
Computer misuse sense.
- Is computer system misuse meant, requiring only defensive guidance? boundary
- Which security entry fits? action
What the second pass must settle
- Should forms of abuse be separate entries?
- How should helplines be localised?
- How should the computer misuse aliases be moved?