← Back to catalogue
Research draft

sin

vr.tr.sin · ACT.ACT

Let an agent explain concepts of sin across religious and moral traditions with attribution, describe categories and practices of confession and atonement, present philosophical and secular perspectives, and avoid endorsing or judging beliefs.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain concepts of sin across religious and moral traditions with attribution, describe categories and practices of confession and atonement, present philosophical and secular perspectives, and avoid endorsing or judging beliefs.

An act, thought or state regarded in a religious or moral tradition as a transgression against divine law, sacred order or moral duty, understood variously across traditions: as offence against God in the Abrahamic religions with categories such as mortal and venial sin and lists such as the seven deadly sins, as aparadha or offence in Indian traditions, and in other frameworks; concepts of sin shape ethics, ritual, confession and atonement, and are described here with attribution to the traditions that hold them.

What it is for: Religious and moral concepts of transgression.

It can be explain concepts with attribution; describe categories and practices; present other perspectives; avoid endorsement or judgement.

Distinguishing features

Religious framing

Tradition-specific

Categories and lists

Atonement practices

What it looks like

Not physical; a religious and moral concept.

How it is recognised

Transgression against divine or moral law

Tradition-specific categories

Crime is legal; guilt is a feeling or legal finding

Related models

is a kind of - category

intentional human activity

is related to - moral frameworks

morality

is related to - the divine in Abrahamic conceptions

God

is related to - a related concept of prohibition

taboo

In practice

Families and kinds

sin in Judaism

sin in Christianity including mortal and venial categories

sin in Islam

offence and karma in Indian traditions

moral transgression in secular ethics

Standards and regulation

Religious law and teaching by tradition

No civil regulation of the concept

Content policies on respectful treatment of religion

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting one tradition as universal

Judging individuals or groups as sinful

Confusing sin with crime

Also called

sin listdesperatioaparādhaKabiraThe Nine Satanic Sinsseven deadly sinsinternal sinvenial sineternal sinsin of omissionIslamic views on sinJewish views on sintsumiFive Thievesancestral sinBuddhist views on sinlove of moneymortal sinNajashCursing in IslamMa'siaIjramDhanbSayyiaKhati'aSaghiraHumqIthmFasidTajasusIsa'aDhullSu' adh-dhannKhithlanDisclosing secrets in IslamTa'sirJafa'KhubthTanfirFutur

+6

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.sin-act

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand Concepts of sin.

Attribution.

Traditions

Across traditions.

Traditions

Traditions.

  1. How do Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and other traditions understand sin or transgression, in their own terms? provenance
  2. Is the presentation attributed and free of endorsement or judgement? boundary

Categories

Categories and lists.

Categories

Categories.

  1. What are categories such as mortal and venial sin and lists such as the seven deadly sins, and how do traditions use them? provenance
  2. Which entry fits a specific tradition? action
Practice Confession and atonement.

Religious practice.

Atonement

Atonement practices.

Atonement

Atonement.

  1. How do traditions practise confession, repentance, atonement and forgiveness? provenance
  2. Is the user seeking personal spiritual guidance, which belongs with their community? boundary

Ethics

Sin and ethics.

Ethics

Ethics.

  1. How do religious ethics relate sin to virtue, conscience and law? provenance
  2. Which entry fits morality? action
Perspectives Other perspectives.

Attribution.

Philosophy

Philosophical views.

Philosophy

Philosophy.

  1. How have philosophers and secular ethicists analysed the concept of sin, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits moral philosophy? action

Psychology

Psychological perspectives.

Psychology

Psychology.

  1. What do psychologists say about guilt, shame and religious concepts of sin? provenance
  2. Is someone in distress, needing support? boundary
Learn History and culture.

Education.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How have concepts of sin developed historically, according to historians of religion? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Culture

In art and literature.

Culture

Culture.

  1. How is sin represented in art, literature and popular culture? provenance
  2. Which misconceptions arise? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Should each tradition have a separate entry?
  • How should scriptural sources be linked?
  • How should secular perspectives be represented?