← Back to catalogue
Research draft

truth

vr.tr.truth · INF.MED

Let an agent explain truth as a philosophical and logical concept, relay the main theories with attribution, describe applied senses such as ground truth and historicity, and present contested questions such as historicity of religious and epic texts neutrally.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain truth as a philosophical and logical concept, relay the main theories with attribution, describe applied senses such as ground truth and historicity, and present contested questions such as historicity of religious and epic texts neutrally.

The property of a statement, belief or proposition that corresponds to fact or reality, analysed in philosophy through correspondence, coherence, pragmatic, deflationary and other theories, treated in logic as a truth value that may in some systems admit degrees of truth, and applied in specific senses such as ground truth in measurement and machine learning, absolute truth in metaphysics and religion, and historicity as the truth of past events, including debates over the historicity of the Bible and of the Homeric epics.

What it is for: Not applicable; a concept.

It can be explain the concept; relay theories with attribution; describe applied senses; present contested questions neutrally.

Distinguishing features

Property of propositions

Multiple theories

Logical truth values

Applied senses

What it looks like

Not a visible object; a property of statements.

How it is recognised

Correspondence of statements to reality

Theories of truth, truth values, degrees of truth, ground truth, absolute truth, historicity

Fact is what is the case; knowledge is justified true belief on classic views; honesty is a virtue about telling truth

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms, as a property of propositions

proposition

is studied in - and philosophy of language

epistemology

is formalised as - in logic

truth value

is contrasted with - and with belief

falsehood

In practice

Families and kinds

theories of truth: correspondence, coherence, pragmatic, deflationary, semantic

truth values and degrees of truth in logic

absolute and relative truth

ground truth in measurement and machine learning

historicity of events and texts, including the Bible and the Homeric epics

truth in law, journalism and science

Standards and regulation

No regulation; legal standards of evidence and journalistic codes as applied forms

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting one theory of truth as settled

Presenting historicity debates as settled

Confusing truth with certainty or consensus

Also called

absolute truthhistoricitydegree of truthground truthHistoricity of the Homeric epicshistoricity of the Biblehistorical reliability of the Gospelsunconfirmed if the same characterunconfirmed

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.truth

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What truth is.

Attribution.

Definition

Concept.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is truth, and how does it differ from fact, knowledge, certainty and honesty? definition
  2. Is the question about the philosophical concept, a logical notion, ground truth or historicity? boundary

Theories

Theories of truth.

Theories

Theories.

  1. What do correspondence, coherence, pragmatic, deflationary and semantic theories say, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific theory? action
Logic Logic and science.

Science.

Values

Truth values.

Values

Values.

  1. How do classical, many-valued and fuzzy logics treat truth and degrees of truth? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Ground truth

Ground truth.

Ground truth

Ground truth.

  1. What is ground truth in measurement, remote sensing and machine learning? provenance
  2. Which entry fits ground truth? action
History Historicity.

Attribution.

Historicity

Historicity.

Historicity

Historicity.

  1. How do historians assess the historicity of events and texts? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance

Debates

Contested cases.

Debates

Debates.

  1. What do scholars and traditions say about the historicity of the Bible and the Homeric epics, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral and attributed? boundary
Context Society and history of ideas.

Context.

Society

Truth in society.

Society

Society.

  1. How do law, journalism and science establish truth, and what debates surround post-truth politics, with attribution? provenance
  2. Which entry fits misinformation? action

Ideas

History of ideas.

Ideas

Ideas.

  1. How have ideas of truth developed from Aristotle and Aquinas to Tarski and contemporary debates? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of philosophy? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should theories of truth and historicity be separate primary entries?
  • How should philosophical references be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming applied senses and specific historicity debates; should they be split off?