← Back to catalogue
Research draft

taxonomy

vr.tr.taxonomy · INF.KNW

Let an agent explain taxonomy as biological classification, relay principles, codes, ranks and approaches with attribution, describe group-specific taxonomies and databases, and distinguish biological taxonomy from classification schemes in other fields.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain taxonomy as biological classification, relay principles, codes, ranks and approaches with attribution, describe group-specific taxonomies and databases, and distinguish biological taxonomy from classification schemes in other fields.

The science and practice of classifying organisms into groups based on shared characteristics and evolutionary relationships, naming them under codes of nomenclature and arranging them in hierarchies of species, genera, families and higher ranks, with approaches from Linnaean and evolutionary taxonomy to cladistics and phylogenetic systematics, and schemes such as the two-domain system and group-specific taxonomies of diatoms or grasses; the word is also used for classification schemes in other fields, from tank classification to educational and information taxonomies.

What it is for: Classifying and naming organisms.

It can be explain principles and ranks; relay codes and approaches; describe databases; distinguish other uses of the word.

Distinguishing features

Hierarchical ranks

Nomenclature codes

Evolutionary basis

Ongoing revision

What it looks like

Not a visible object; hierarchical trees and named groups.

Physical character

described species: about 2 million count - estimates

main ranks: 8 count - domain to species

How it is recognised

Classification and naming of organisms

Linnaean ranks, cladistics, codes of nomenclature, domain systems

Systematics includes phylogeny; identification keys apply taxonomy; taxonomies in other fields are analogies

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

typology

is part of - the broader science

systematics

is governed by - such as the ICN and ICZN

nomenclature code

is recorded in - such as the Catalogue of Life

taxonomic database

In practice

Families and kinds

Linnaean taxonomy

evolutionary taxonomy

cladistics and phylogenetic nomenclature

domain systems: two-domain and three-domain

group-specific taxonomies such as of diatoms and Poaceae

taxonomies in other fields such as educational objectives and tank classification, as analogies

Identifiers

ICZN zoological code

ICN botanical code

ICNP prokaryotic code

Standards and regulation

International codes of nomenclature

Type specimen and publication requirements

Database standards such as Darwin Core

Failure modes and hazards

Unstable names and synonyms

Confusing taxonomy with other classification schemes

Presenting contested classifications as settled

Also called

Two-domain systemTaxonomy of diatomstaxonomy of PoaceaeRomiszowskitank classificationevolutionary taxonomybacterial taxonomydinosaur classificationchemotaxonomyBenton Classification

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.taxonomy

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What taxonomy is.

Science.

Definition

Definition and ranks.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is biological taxonomy, and what are its ranks and principles? definition
  2. Is the question about biological taxonomy or a classification scheme in another field? boundary

Approaches

Approaches.

Approaches

Approaches.

  1. How do Linnaean, evolutionary and cladistic approaches differ, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific approach? action
Practice Naming and codes.

Regulation.

Codes

Nomenclature codes.

Codes

Codes.

  1. How do the zoological, botanical and prokaryotic codes govern names, types and priority? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Describing

Describing species.

Describing

Describing.

  1. How are new species described and published? provenance
  2. Which entry fits species description? action
Groups Domains and groups.

Attribution.

Domains

Domain systems.

Domains

Domains.

  1. What are the two-domain and three-domain systems, and what is the debate, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation attributed? boundary

Specific

Group taxonomies.

Specific

Specific.

  1. How are groups such as diatoms and grasses classified, and where are their taxonomies maintained? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Context Databases and history.

Context.

Databases

Databases.

Databases

Databases.

  1. What taxonomic databases exist, and how do they handle synonyms and changes? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the Catalogue of Life? action

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did taxonomy develop from Aristotle and Linnaeus to molecular phylogenetics? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of taxonomy? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should each code and approach be a separate entry?
  • How should taxonomic databases be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming group taxonomies and non-biological schemes; should they be split off?