civilization
Let an agent handle civilizations by region, period, features and sources, presenting the concept critically and avoiding value rankings of cultures.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent handle civilizations by region, period, features and sources, presenting the concept critically and avoiding value rankings of cultures.
A complex society characterised by cities, social stratification, specialised labour, writing or record systems, monumental architecture and organised government; the term is also used for large cultural spheres, and its use has been criticised for implying hierarchy between cultures.
What it is for: Describing large-scale societies in history and archaeology.
It can be summarise early civilizations from sources; explain criteria and critiques of the concept; find archaeological and historical resources; separate speculative uses such as extraterrestrial civilizations.
Distinguishing features
Complex, urban societies
Contested criteria
Studied by archaeology and history
Term carries value judgements
What it looks like
Not physical; evidenced by cities, monuments, writing and artefacts.
How it is recognised
Cities, writing and monuments
Cradles of civilization such as Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley
Civility as manners is a different sense
Related models
is a kind of - category
is studied by - fields
includes - feature
is related to - concept
In practice
Families and kinds
early river valley civilizations
classical civilizations
Mesoamerican and Andean civilizations
medieval civilizations
hypothetical extraterrestrial civilizations
Standards and regulation
World Heritage Convention for sites
Failure modes and hazards
Ranking cultures as more or less civilised
Eurocentric framing
Unsourced claims about ancient societies
Also called
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Also registered as vr.tr.civilization
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Society Which civilization.
Sources identify.
Identity
Name and period.
Identity
Identity.
- Which civilization, region and period is meant? provenance
- Which sources describe it? provenance
Features
Characteristics.
Features
Features.
- What features do archaeologists identify, such as cities or writing? provenance
- How strong is the evidence? boundary
Concept Critique.
The term is debated.
Criteria
Definitions.
Criteria
Criteria.
- Which criteria define a civilization in this source? provenance
- Are they contested? boundary
Critique
Value judgements.
Critique
Critique.
- Does the use imply a ranking of cultures? boundary
- How do scholars critique it? provenance
Evidence Archaeology.
Evidence grounds claims.
Sites
Archaeological sites.
Sites
Sites.
- Which sites provide evidence, and are they protected? provenance
- How can they be visited? provenance
Myths
Pseudo-archaeology.
Myths
Pseudo-archaeology.
- Is a claim about lost civilizations pseudo-archaeology? boundary
- What do archaeologists say? provenance
Senses Disambiguation.
Uses vary.
Speculative
Extraterrestrial.
Speculative
Speculative sense.
- Is a hypothetical extraterrestrial civilization meant? boundary
- Which entry fits? action
Games
Media.
Games
Media sense.
- Is a game or book titled Civilization meant? boundary
- Which entry fits? action
What the second pass must settle
- Should each civilization be a separate entry?
- How should critiques of the term be presented?
- How should speculative uses be split off?