← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Serbian

vr.tr.serbian · INF.MED

Let an agent explain the Serbian language, its standard, scripts and dialects, relay history, status and the Serbo-Croatian debate from linguistic sources with attribution, describe the varieties the registry aliases name, and distinguish Serbian from Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin standards and from Old Church Slavonic, presenting contested questions neutrally.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain the Serbian language, its standard, scripts and dialects, relay history, status and the Serbo-Croatian debate from linguistic sources with attribution, describe the varieties the registry aliases name, and distinguish Serbian from Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin standards and from Old Church Slavonic, presenting contested questions neutrally.

A South Slavic language of the Serbo-Croatian group, the official language of Serbia and co-official in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Montenegro, and recognised as a minority language in Croatia and other countries, written in both Cyrillic and Latin scripts, with Ekavian and Ijekavian pronunciations of the standard and dialects such as the Timok-Luznica dialect of the Torlakian area; whether Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin are one language or several is debated by linguists and shaped by national identity, and the status of Serbian in Montenegro and Croatia is a political and linguistic question presented with attribution.

What it is for: Not applicable; a language.

It can be explain the language; relay history and status; describe varieties and scripts; distinguish related standards.

Distinguishing features

Serbo-Croatian group

Two scripts

Ekavian standard

Contested boundaries

What it looks like

Not a visible object; text in Cyrillic or Latin script.

Physical character

speakers: about 8-9 million - estimates

scripts: Cyrillic and Latin list - digraphia

Vuk Karadzic reform: 19th century note

ISO 639: sr, srp note

How it is recognised

South Slavic language of Serbia and neighbours

Ekavian and Ijekavian, Cyrillic and Latin scripts, Timok-Luznica dialect, Serbian in Montenegro and Croatia

Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin are closely related standards; Old Church Slavonic is the liturgical ancestor

Related models

is a kind of - dialect base, in registry terms

Eastern Herzegovinian

belongs to - the pluricentric language

Serbo-Croatian

is written in - and Latin script

Serbian Cyrillic alphabet

was standardised by - in the 19th century

Vuk Karadzic

In practice

Families and kinds

standard Serbian in Ekavian and Ijekavian

Serbian in Cyrillic and Latin script

Shtokavian dialects

Torlakian dialects such as Timok-Luznica

Serbian as a minority language in Croatia, Hungary and Romania

Serbian in Montenegro

Identifiers

ISO 639-1 sr Serbian

ISO 639-3 srp Serbian

Glottolog serb1264 Serbian

Standards and regulation

Serbian law on official use of language and script

Minority language laws in Croatia and other countries

European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages

Failure modes and hazards

Partisan framing of the Serbo-Croatian question

Conflating script choice with politics

Registry aliases mixing pronunciations, scripts, dialects and country contexts

Also called

Serbian language in MontenegroSerbian language in CroatiaIjekavianEkavianTimok–Lužnica dialectSerbian in Cyrilic scriptSerbian in Latin script

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What Serbian is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is the Serbian language, and how does it relate to Croatian, Bosnian, Montenegrin and Old Church Slavonic, with the debate attributed? definition
  2. Is the question about linguistics, scripts, a dialect, status in a country or a political debate? boundary

Varieties

Varieties.

Varieties

Varieties.

  1. What are Ekavian and Ijekavian, the Cyrillic and Latin scripts, the Timok-Luznica dialect and Serbian in Montenegro and Croatia? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific variety? action
Language Structure and scripts.

Sources.

Grammar

Grammar and sound.

Grammar

Grammar.

  1. What are the main features of Serbian phonology, grammar and vocabulary? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Scripts

Scripts.

Scripts

Scripts.

  1. How do the Cyrillic and Latin scripts coexist, and what does the law provide? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Status Status and debates.

Attribution.

Countries

Status by country.

Countries

Countries.

  1. What is the status of Serbian in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Kosovo and Croatia, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral and attributed? boundary

Debate

One language or several.

Debate

Debate.

  1. What do linguists and the 2017 Declaration on the Common Language say about Serbo-Croatian, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Serbo-Croatian? action
Context History and culture.

Context.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did Serbian develop from Old Church Slavonic through Vuk Karadzic s reform? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of the Serbian language? action

Culture

Literature and media.

Culture

Culture.

  1. What are the major works of Serbian literature and media? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Serbian literature? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should Ekavian, Ijekavian and the Timok-Luznica dialect be separate primary entries?
  • How should linguistic sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming pronunciations, scripts, dialects and national contexts; should they be split off?