Creative Work
Describe one intellectual or artistic work across its realizations, keeping the work distinct from media assets, editions, copies, rights and publication events.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
6 bundles · 12 layers · 12 findings · 48 questions
Identity and description Work-scoped identity and description.
Work recognition
Record the rationale that one conceptual work is being described. Keep competing identifications unresolved rather than merging on title, topic, file digest or a recording identifier.
Identity decision
Record the rationale that one conceptual work is being described. Keep competing identifications unresolved rather than merging on title, topic, file digest or a recording identifier.
- Which master work identifier and identifier scheme identify this work? identity
- What observed realization or historical evidence supports recognizing this work? evidence
- What distinguishes this work from a similarly titled or thematically similar work? decision
- How is a disputed duplicate or mistaken work merge represented and reversed? exception
Descriptive context
Maintain language-tagged names, work type, subjects and descriptions as attributed assertions. Descriptive places and times are not automatically the place or time of creation.
Titles and context
Maintain language-tagged names, work type, subjects and descriptions as attributed assertions. Descriptive places and times are not automatically the place or time of creation.
- Which work type and genre vocabulary were applied, with which version? classification
- Which preferred, alternative and translated titles name the work in each context? definition
- Which depicted places and periods are distinguished from the place and time of creation? spatial
- What description or audience claim is supported, disputed or intentionally absent? quality
Realizations and embodiments Work-scoped realizations and embodiments.
Expression context
Use work-local expression descriptors with independent expression identifiers. A translation, arrangement or revision is classified by an explicit profile; transformative changes may require a related work. A work record can have unknown realization details without asserting an unrealized idea is an LRM work.
Realization distinction
Use work-local expression descriptors with independent expression identifiers. A translation, arrangement or revision is classified by an explicit profile; transformative changes may require a related work. A work record can have unknown realization details without asserting an unrealized idea is an LRM work.
- Which identified expression realizes this work under the selected cataloguing profile? identity
- Which language, signs or performance form distinguish each realization? classification
- When does the documented change require a new expression or a separate derived work? decision
- Which representative expression characteristics may be displayed at work level? constraint
Embodiment references
Describe typed embodiment relationships while retaining external edition, asset, recording and copy identities. A single publication can carry expressions of multiple works; a recording identifier is not a file identifier or a universal work key.
Manifestations and assets
Describe typed embodiment relationships while retaining external edition, asset, recording and copy identities. A single publication can carry expressions of multiple works; a recording identifier is not a file identifier or a universal work key.
- Which manifestations embody which expressions of this work, including unpublished embodiments? composition
- Which identifiers refer to a recording, edition, copy or digital rendition rather than this work? identity
- Which extent or accessibility observation belongs to a specific realization or asset? measurement
- Which authorized catalogue links expose usable embodiments without exposing restricted payloads? access
Contributions and evidence Work-scoped contributions and evidence.
Attribution
Record evidence-qualified credit at the correct work or expression level. Anonymous, pseudonymous, collective and contested credit can be represented without inventing an identified natural person or inferring rights shares from roles.
Contributor roles
Record evidence-qualified credit at the correct work or expression level. Anonymous, pseudonymous, collective and contested credit can be represented without inventing an identified natural person or inferring rights shares from roles.
- Who is credited for which work or expression contribution and under which role vocabulary? relationship
- What source supports or challenges each attribution and credit wording? evidence
- How is contributor credit separated from legal ownership and catalogue stewardship? ownership
- Which identity details must be withheld while preserving a legitimate public credit? privacy
Provenance assertions
Attach sources to descriptive claims and distinguish creation activities from metadata ingestion. Human, assisted, automated or unknown generation assertions remain evidence-qualified; credentials and digests are not proof of truth, authorship or copyright eligibility.
Evidence and generation context
Attach sources to descriptive claims and distinguish creation activities from metadata ingestion. Human, assisted, automated or unknown generation assertions remain evidence-qualified; credentials and digests are not proof of truth, authorship or copyright eligibility.
- Which agent and activity produced the work description or supplied a particular claim? provenance
- Which creation, modification and ingestion times are known with what precision? temporal
- What supports the declared human, assisted, automated or unknown origin of a realization? evidence
- How are contradictory or withdrawn provenance assertions preserved for review? validation
Work relationships Work-scoped work relationships.
Derivation and reference
Keep adaptation, translation, sequel, quotation, reference and equivalence claims distinct. Direction, target level and evidence are explicit; an undifferentiated related-work link does not establish identity or permission.
Typed related works
Keep adaptation, translation, sequel, quotation, reference and equivalence claims distinct. Direction, target level and evidence are explicit; an undifferentiated related-work link does not establish identity or permission.
- Which related work is the source, successor or referenced subject of this relationship? relationship
- Which profile distinguishes adaptation, expression derivation and mere citation? classification
- What prevents unsupported equivalence or impossible part-cycle assertions? constraint
- Who approved the relation claim and what remains contested? authority
Parts and aggregating works
Distinguish a work with parts from an aggregating work that provides selection or arrangement. Co-publication does not make all component works parts of one intellectual creation or transfer their ownership.
Assembly intent
Distinguish a work with parts from an aggregating work that provides selection or arrangement. Co-publication does not make all component works parts of one intellectual creation or transfer their ownership.
- What selection or ordering plan identifies an aggregating work independently of its contents? composition
- Which component references describe work parts versus expressions gathered in a manifestation? relationship
- How are changes to an evolving collection or serial distinguished from a new work? lifecycle
- How are omitted, repeated or independently governed components represented? exception
Rights context and reuse Work-scoped rights context and reuse.
Rights assertions
Carry references to rights assertions at the work, expression or embodiment level. Unknown, disputed and time-limited claims remain distinct; national applicability and underlying legal records are delegated.
Scoped rights evidence
Carry references to rights assertions at the work, expression or embodiment level. Unknown, disputed and time-limited claims remain distinct; national applicability and underlying legal records are delegated.
- Which party claims which right over which precisely identified target? ownership
- For which territory, term and observation date is each rights assertion reported? temporal
- What evidence supports public-domain or licence claims for the proposed target and territory? evidence
- How are conflicting claims, orphan status or incomplete ownership chains exposed? exception
Reuse decision references
Store the context and result reference of an external reuse decision. Descriptive rights metadata, a licence offer or public availability never substitutes for a qualified permission assessment or another applicable legal basis.
Permission context
Store the context and result reference of an external reuse decision. Descriptive rights metadata, a licence offer or public availability never substitutes for a qualified permission assessment or another applicable legal basis.
- What intended use, target and audience are submitted for external clearance review? requirement
- Which authoritative decision or policy reference supports the reported reuse status? authority
- Which attribution, restriction or duty references apply to that reported decision? constraint
- Which rights information can appear in a public catalogue versus a restricted review view? access
Catalogue continuity and exchange Work-scoped catalogue continuity and exchange.
Lifecycle context
Separate the state of the catalogue record from reported creative progress and from release or performance events. Withdrawal of availability does not erase the historical work; physical properties belong to embodiments.
Status and event references
Separate the state of the catalogue record from reported creative progress and from release or performance events. Withdrawal of availability does not erase the historical work; physical properties belong to embodiments.
- Which status describes this catalogue record and which describes reported creative progress? state
- Which release, performance or exhibition record evidences a dated public occurrence? event
- Which revision, correction or withdrawal changes the description without changing work identity? lifecycle
- Which policy controls retention, lawful erasure and minimal tombstones for this work record? retention
Interoperability and quality
Version mappings rather than assuming that every vocabulary describes the same abstraction level. Emit information-loss and unresolved-reference reports; no executable mapping, runtime implementation or conformance certificate is claimed.
Profile-qualified exchange
Version mappings rather than assuming that every vocabulary describes the same abstraction level. Emit information-loss and unresolved-reference reports; no executable mapping, runtime implementation or conformance certificate is claimed.
- Which pinned vocabulary profile maps this work and its expression context into the target system? interoperability
- Which distinctions or uncertain claims are lost or reinterpreted by a proposed projection? validation
- Which required references and evidence remain unresolved before a catalogue export? quality
- Which export view prevents restricted evidence from leaking through nested references? security
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- World Models
- Category
- Information and virtual systems
- Entry kind
- entity
- Navigation path
- NAV.INF.MED.WRK
- Domain
- INF.MED.WRK
- Industry
- Cross-industry
- Tags
- creativeworkinf.med.wrk
- Also called
- N5
What it is Filled
One governed work identity and its descriptive assertions. Work-local expression descriptors and typed links to embodiments retain WEMI distinctions inside the context; referenced media, publication, legal and event records keep their own masters. All operations below are proposed local metadata operations, not implemented services.
In scope
- Work identity, recognition evidence, names and descriptive classification
- Work-local realization descriptors, representative characteristics and embodiment references
- Contribution and provenance claims with uncertainty and scoped evidence
- Part, aggregation, derivation and related-work links
- References to scoped rights assertions, reuse decisions and external availability events
- Catalogue lifecycle, correction history and documented vocabulary mappings
Out of scope
- Media bytes, transcoding, preservation execution, copy custody and rendition lifecycle
- Publication/edition production, release execution, performance scheduling and distribution transactions
- Copyright adjudication, licensing, rights transfer, royalty calculation and access-control enforcement
- Person and organization master data, language vocabulary governance and full provenance credential verification
- Scholarly peer review, scholarly-publication lifecycle and software execution semantics
Why it exists Filled
Describe one intellectual or artistic work across its realizations, keeping the work distinct from media assets, editions, copies, rights and publication events.
Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review
- Unlike Registry and legacy N5: standalone-mm is a registry record-plane classification; entity describes this subject. The WEMI flag is reconciled by internal typed context and links, not by taking ownership of every manifestation or item. Legacy conformance claims are not inherited.
- Unlike WM-MED-002 Media Asset / Rendition; WM-MED-004 Audio / Video Recording: A work can be linked to many assets and recordings. Byte equality and ISRC equality do not establish abstract work identity; technical assets and recordings retain separate masters.
- Unlike WM-MED-003 Publication / Edition; WM-REC-001 Document / Record: Only embodiment and evidence references live here. Editions may embody multiple expressions; unpublished embodiments are not excluded. Record retention and publication operations belong to the referenced owners.
- Unlike WM-KNW-003 Intellectual Property Right: Rights references and uncertain assertions do not grant permission. Authorship, metadata stewardship and rights holding differ; copyright is not restricted to registered rights.
- Unlike WM-PER-001 Person; WM-ORG-001 Organization; WM-KNW-002 Language / Terminology: Contributor, collective and language references carry work-specific roles or labels without copying their master lifecycles.
- Unlike WM-REC-004 Scholarly Publication; WM-MED-008 Content Provenance Credential: Legacy split gives scholarly publication its own model. This root may link to it and to provenance credentials without owning review, credential verification or truth certification.
- Unlike IFLA LRM, BIBFRAME and Schema.org: These are contextual alignments, not interchangeable identity schemes. An LRM expression can require a separate BIBFRAME Work; a broad CreativeWork type alone cannot establish the abstraction level.
Note: Derived from boundary notes against neighbouring models.
What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review
Must not
- Public availability, credit, registration status or an ODRL offer must not be promoted to universal reuse permission
- Deny access unless the adopting policy authorizes the recipient and purpose.
May
- Propose work identity: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Compare recognition evidence and candidate identities without an automatic merge.
- Record realization context: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate an expression descriptor and typed embodiment references with this work.
- Record contribution assertion: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach attributed credit and provenance with disagreement visible.
- Propose work relationship: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an evidence-qualified derivation, part or aggregation link.
- Attach external rights decision: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate scoped rights evidence and an external reuse decision with a target.
- Revise catalogue description: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Apply an authorized local metadata revision and prepare a scoped projection.
Note: Derived from functions, policies, CRUD and access rules; prohibitions were not authored for agents as such.
Moral aspects Derived, awaiting review
- Specify access, privacy, evidence, retention, dispute and correction procedures before operating instances
- Sensitive, harmful or culturally restricted material is represented only through policy-qualified description and references; do not embed actionable dangerous content
- Apply privacy, access, retention and lawful disposition policies
- Community authority, national copyright, moral rights, traditional expressions and automated authorship need qualified profile review
Note: Sentences mentioning harm, privacy, consent or similar, collected from the specification.
Owners Filled
Steward
Identify the adopting Dimension and metadata steward with a documented authority basis, separately from creators and rights holders
Roles
- Metadata steward
- Approve identity and description changes within documented scope
- Contributor or authorized representative
- Supply or contest attribution evidence without automatic rights authority
- Rights reviewer
- Provide qualified external rights and reuse decision references
- Catalogue curator
- Maintain expression, relation and mapping assertions
- Access and records custodian
- Apply privacy, access, retention and lawful disposition policies
- Evidence reviewer
- Review conflicts, omissions and source limits without claiming independent provider review
Links to other meta-models Filled
references
- WM-PER-001 - Candidate binding for contributors and individual claimants; person master and lifecycle remain external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-ORG-001 - Candidate binding for collective contributors, stewards and publishers; organization authority is not inferred from this link. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-KNW-002 - Language and controlled terminology references; vocabulary governance remains external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-KNW-003 - Rights assertions and qualified legal authority, including unregistered rights; adjudication and transfer remain external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-MED-002 - Typed rendition and media master references; no file lifecycle, transcoding or preservation execution. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-MED-003 - Publication and edition references, retaining many-to-many embodiment context without release operations. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-MED-004 - Recording identities, including ISRC at recording level; no assumption of equivalence to a work or byte sequence. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-REC-001 - Governed documents and source evidence retained in their record masters; textual embodiment is optional. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-REC-004 - Scholarly-publication specialization remains separately governed after the legacy split; no peer-review lifecycle here. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- WM-MED-008 - Optional provenance credential reference; verification and credential lifecycle remain external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
aligned
- IFLA LRM - Conceptual WEMI alignment to the cited 2017-12 text, with profile-specific work boundaries and later-version review required. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- Schema.org CreativeWork - Broad discovery projection with explicit target level and loss report; not exact identity equivalence. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- BIBFRAME 2.0 - Explicit Work/Instance/Item crosswalk; expression boundaries can differ and mappings are not implemented. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- DCMI Metadata Terms - Descriptive property mapping with typed target level, source and profile version. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- PROV-O - Claim lineage mapping; neither attribution nor a hash certifies truth. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
- ODRL 2.2 - Policy-reference alignment only; external decisions own evaluation, interpretation and enforcement. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.
neighbor
- Registry and legacy N5 - standalone-mm is a registry record-plane classification; entity describes this subject. The WEMI flag is reconciled by internal typed context and links, not by taking ownership of every manifestation or item. Legacy conformance claims are not inherited.
- WM-MED-002 Media Asset / Rendition; WM-MED-004 Audio / Video Recording - A work can be linked to many assets and recordings. Byte equality and ISRC equality do not establish abstract work identity; technical assets and recordings retain separate masters.
- WM-MED-003 Publication / Edition; WM-REC-001 Document / Record - Only embodiment and evidence references live here. Editions may embody multiple expressions; unpublished embodiments are not excluded. Record retention and publication operations belong to the referenced owners.
- WM-KNW-003 Intellectual Property Right - Rights references and uncertain assertions do not grant permission. Authorship, metadata stewardship and rights holding differ; copyright is not restricted to registered rights.
- WM-PER-001 Person; WM-ORG-001 Organization; WM-KNW-002 Language / Terminology - Contributor, collective and language references carry work-specific roles or labels without copying their master lifecycles.
- WM-REC-004 Scholarly Publication; WM-MED-008 Content Provenance Credential - Legacy split gives scholarly publication its own model. This root may link to it and to provenance credentials without owning review, credential verification or truth certification.
- IFLA LRM, BIBFRAME and Schema.org - These are contextual alignments, not interchangeable identity schemes. An LRM expression can require a separate BIBFRAME Work; a broad CreativeWork type alone cannot establish the abstraction level.
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Authoritative master-system identifier
- Governed global identifier or IRI
- UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.
Recognition optional Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- Propose work identity: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Compare recognition evidence and candidate identities without an automatic merge.
- Record realization context: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate an expression descriptor and typed embodiment references with this work.
- Record contribution assertion: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach attributed credit and provenance with disagreement visible.
- Propose work relationship: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an evidence-qualified derivation, part or aggregation link.
- Attach external rights decision: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate scoped rights evidence and an external reuse decision with a target.
- Revise catalogue description: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Apply an authorized local metadata revision and prepare a scoped projection.
Hazards and failure modes optional Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Standards and interfaces required Derived, awaiting review
- PROV-O: The PROV Ontology
Context of use required Filled
- Bibliographic standards are modelling inputs, not universal definitions of legal works
- WIPO guidance is general information; no national copyright eligibility, term or clearance ruling is made
- English is the package language; multilingual names, scripts and cultural authority require adoption profiles
Sources Filled
- IFLA Library Reference Model - International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions
- CreativeWork - Schema.org community
- DCMI Metadata Terms - Dublin Core Metadata Initiative
- PROV-O: The PROV Ontology - World Wide Web Consortium
- ODRL Information Model 2.2 - World Wide Web Consortium
- Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model - Library of Congress
- Frequently Asked Questions: Copyright - World Intellectual Property Organization
- International Standard Recording Code - Home - International Federation of the Phonographic Industry
Open questions
- Verify current source versions and selected claim support, review later LRM revisions and pin a stable Schema.org version before claiming operational alignment.
- Develop qualified creative-domain and rights profiles plus nested schemas and fixtures for translation/adaptation, anonymous authorship, aggregates, duplicate titles, disputed rights, withdrawal and lossy mappings.
- Restore independent external review before any canonical or publishable-draft promotion.
- Executable nested instance schemas, vocabulary pins and tested mappings
- Comprehensive music, film, choreography, interactive, live and evolving-work cataloguing profiles
- Qualified national rights, orphan works, collective rights, cultural protocols and machine-generated authorship review
- Independent external research and direct HTTP source checks; later IFLA revisions and stable Schema.org release pin
Machine files
Provenance
world-models research · reviewable-draft
Built from: models/wm-med-001-creative-work/spec.yaml